Category: author

Understanding Genre in Literary Circles: The Architecture of Storytelling

Understanding Genre in Literary Circles: The Architecture of Storytelling

Every story we tell exists within a framework, a set of expectations, conventions, and traditions that help readers navigate the vast landscape of literature. This framework is what we call genre, and understanding it is essential for both writers crafting their next work and readers seeking their next great read.

What Is Genre?

At its core, genre is a category of literature defined by its style, form, or content. Think of genre as a literary fingerprint: a combination of narrative techniques, thematic concerns, structural patterns, and tonal qualities that distinguish one type of storytelling from another. When you pick up a mystery novel, you expect clues, suspense, and a resolution. When you open a satire, you anticipate wit, irony, and social commentary.Genres aren’t arbitrary labels; they’re the result of centuries of literary evolution, shaped by cultural needs, audience preferences, and the creative innovations of countless writers.

The Major Literary Genres

Let’s explore some foundational genres that have shaped literary tradition.

Comedy Rooted in humor and often ending in reconciliation or celebration, comedy uses wit, irony, and absurdity to explore human folly. From Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream to modern rom-coms in novel form, comedy invites readers to laugh while reflecting on the human condition.

Tragedy The counterpart to comedy, tragedy centers on the downfall of a protagonist, often due to a fatal flaw (hamartia) or circumstances beyond their control. Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex and Shakespeare’s Hamlet exemplify how tragedy explores suffering, fate, and moral consequence.

Mystery Built around a puzzle, typically a crime, the mystery genre hooks readers with suspense, clues, and the satisfaction of resolution. Agatha Christie’s detective novels remain quintessential examples of this genre’s enduring appeal.Satire Using humor, exaggeration, and irony, satire critiques society, politics, or human behavior. Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels and George Orwell’s Animal Farm demonstrate satire’s power to entertain while provoking critical thought.

Epic Characterized by grand scope, heroic figures, and elevated language, epic literature often chronicles significant cultural or historical events. Homer’s The Odyssey and Milton’s Paradise Lost showcase the genre’s sweeping ambition.Beyond these classical categories, contemporary literature has expanded to include genres such as science fiction, fantasy, romance, horror, literary fiction, and countless hybrid forms that blend traditional boundaries.

Why Explore Genre?

Understanding genre serves a dual purpose for writers and readers alike.

For Writers: Genre provides a toolkit of conventions (expected structures, themes, and techniques) that offer a starting point for storytelling. More importantly, understanding these conventions allows writers to innovate. The most compelling literary works often subvert genre expectations, blend multiple genres, or push against established boundaries. Consider how contemporary authors merge literary fiction with speculative elements, or how genre-bending works like The Handmaid’s Tale combine dystopian fiction with political commentary and personal narrative.

For Readers: Genre acts as a compass, helping readers navigate their choices and set expectations. When you know a book is classified as horror, you prepare yourself emotionally and intellectually for tension and fear. This framework enhances the reading experience by allowing readers to appreciate both adherence to and departure from genre conventions.

Who Is the Audience, and Why Does It Matter So Much?

Here’s where things get particularly interesting: audience is inseparable from genre. Every genre exists because it serves a particular readership with specific desires, expectations, and cultural contexts.

Identifying Your Audience by Genre:

  • Mystery and thriller readers often crave intellectual engagement, puzzle-solving, and the adrenaline of suspense. They’re typically well-versed in genre conventions and appreciate clever twists.
  • Romance readers seek emotional connection, character development, and often, satisfying resolutions. These readers are famously loyal and vocal about genre expectations.
  • Literary fiction audiences tend to prioritize prose style, thematic depth, and nuanced character exploration over plot-driven narratives.
  • Fantasy and science fiction fans embrace world-building, speculative concepts, and often, extended narrative universes.

Why Audience Is So Critical to the Process:

  1. Audience Shapes Expectations. Readers approach genres with built-in assumptions. A satire audience expects irony and critique; failing to deliver this can alienate readers regardless of writing quality.
  2. Audience Determines Marketability. Publishers and writers must understand their target readership to position a work effectively. Misidentifying genre can lead to mismatched audience expectations and poor reception.
  3. Audience Influences Innovation. Understanding your readership allows writers to know where they can innovate. Genre-savvy readers often appreciate subversion of tropes, while newer audiences might need more traditional structures to feel oriented.
  4. Audience Creates Community. Genres foster reader communities, such as book clubs, online forums, and conventions, where audiences discuss, debate, and celebrate shared literary interests. This communal aspect drives cultural conversations and can even influence future literary trends.
  5. Audience Reflects Cultural Values. The popularity of certain genres often reflects broader societal concerns. The rise of dystopian fiction, for instance, frequently correlates with periods of political or social anxiety.

Genre as a Living, Evolving Framework

Perhaps the most fascinating aspect of genre is its fluidity. While classical genres like tragedy and comedy remain foundational, contemporary literature increasingly defies rigid categorization. Writers today often blend genres, creating literary thrillers, speculative romances, or comedic tragedies, reflecting the complexity of modern storytelling and diverse audience tastes.This evolution underscores a crucial truth: genre isn’t a cage but a conversation. It’s a dialogue between writer and reader, tradition and innovation, expectation and surprise.

Genre remains one of literature’s most powerful organizing principles, not because it limits creativity, but because it provides a shared language between writers and readers. Understanding genre conventions empowers writers to craft work that resonates deeply with intended audiences while also providing the freedom to innovate and subvert expectations meaningfully.Ultimately, genre and audience exist in a symbiotic relationship: genres are defined by the audiences they serve, and audiences find community and satisfaction within genres that speak to their interests and needs. For writers, recognizing this relationship isn’t just academically interesting; it’s essential to crafting stories that truly connect.Whether you’re drafting your first novel or seeking your next literary adventure, understanding genre offers a roadmap through the rich, ever-expanding universe of storytelling.

Join the Conversation

If this exploration of genre resonated with you, whether it sparked a memory of your favorite book or challenged how you think about storytelling, I’d love to hear from you. Share this post with a fellow reader or writer who loves diving into the “why” behind great stories. Drop a comment below and let me know: which genre do you find yourself returning to again and again, and why does it speak to you?

Here’s a question to get us started: Do you think genre boundaries help writers create better stories, or do the most memorable works succeed precisely because they break the rules?

A Book Worth Your Attention: Gods & Insects

Speaking of genre-bending storytelling that refuses easy categorization, I want to introduce you to a book that exemplifies everything we’ve discussed about innovation within and across genres: Gods & Insects by Scott Taylor.

This isn’t your typical thriller, and that’s precisely what makes it compelling. The premise reads like a masterclass in genre-blending: political thriller meets investigative journalism meets slow-burn moral horror. At its center is Ted Smith, whose title, “Special Advisor, Office of Administration,” masks nineteen years of a much darker occupation: making inconvenient truths disappear.

The inciting problem is chilling in its scope. A fleet of tanker trucks has spent years illegally dumping radioactive drilling waste along interstate shoulders across nine states, one rainstorm at a time. The consequences aren’t found where anyone thought to look, near the drilling sites, but in a thin, invisible ribbon along the highways: truck stops, hay fields, and school districts downhill of the road. It’s a environmental catastrophe hiding in plain sight, and Ted has spent nearly two decades ensuring nobody connects the dots.

Then everything changes: an oncologist asks Ted a simple question about occupational exposure, and he lies.

What follows is a race against time. Buried in a spending bill that nobody will read, tucked three pages after a senator’s airport earmark, sits a legislative rider designed to permanently seal twenty years of monitoring data, making every resulting death legally unprovable. The bill reaches the Senate floor in nine days. The only person capable of stopping it is a reporter the White House is actively cultivating into a media darling, though she hasn’t yet realized that the accolades being showered upon her function as a leash rather than a reward.

Why you might be drawn to this book: If our discussion about satire’s power to critique institutions, or epic’s exploration of moral consequence resonated with you, Gods & Insects offers a contemporary, real-world urgency to those same themes. It’s a story about complicity, systemic corruption, and the terrifying efficiency of bureaucratic evil, echoing the way great tragedy explores how ordinary people become instruments of catastrophic harm. For readers who appreciate genre-blending narratives that combine the suspense of a political thriller with the moral weight of literary fiction, this book delivers a haunting meditation on how institutions manufacture deniability while real people pay the price.

If you’re the kind of reader who enjoys stories that use genre conventions to interrogate uncomfortable truths (think Erin Brockovich meets House of Cards), this one deserves a place on your reading list.

Curious to learn more? Check out Gods & Insects on Amazon and see how Ted Smith’s story unfolds.

What genres do you think this book blends most effectively, and does that combination make you more or less likely to pick it up? Let me know in the comments!

The Cutting Room Floor: Why Less Is Often More

The Cutting Room Floor: Why Less Is Often More

Happy Saturday, everyone! I wanted to take a moment today to talk about something every writer eventually has to make peace with: the cutting room floor. That metaphorical space where our beloved words, scenes, and clever turns of phrase go once we realize they simply aren’t serving the story.If you’ve been following along, many of you have read 1300 Feet Per Second, and I’m grateful for every bit of feedback that’s come my way. I’ll be honest—the response has been mixed, and that’s exactly the kind of honesty a writer needs. Readers have connected with the story itself, the concept behind it, and especially the character of Archer, a forensic computer specialist who hunts down hackers and other digital criminals. That’s been wonderful to hear.But the criticism has been just as valuable. The main issues readers have pointed out are inconsistencies—the kind of things I, as the author, overlooked (ahem, guilty as charged). And that brings me to why the cutting room floor matters so much.

When Feedback Becomes Your Beta

I’ve written before about the importance of beta readers, but here’s a truth many indie and first-time authors have to confront: sometimes reader feedback after publication becomes your only real “beta” process, if you will. Not every manuscript gets the luxury of a dozen sharp-eyed readers before it goes out into the world. Sometimes the world itself becomes your test audience, and the lessons come in the form of reviews and honest conversations.That’s humbling. But it’s also a gift, because it teaches you what to trim next time—and what to trim right now.

Killing Your Darlings

There’s an old piece of writing advice: “kill your darlings.” It sounds dramatic, but it simply means being willing to cut the things you’re most attached to when they don’t earn their place. This applies to whole subplots, sure, but it also applies to the small stuff that quietly bloats a manuscript.Here are the usual suspects that belong on the cutting room floor:Filler words. Words like just, really, very, actually, and that often sneak into prose without adding meaning. Strip them out and your sentences tighten instantly.Redundant description. If you’ve told the reader the room is dark, you don’t need to remind them three paragraphs later. Trust your reader’s memory.Repetition and inconsistencies. This is the big one for me right now. Continuity errors—a character’s eye color changing, a timeline that doesn’t add up, a detail contradicted later—pull readers out of the story faster than almost anything else. Careful trimming and re-reading catch these before they embarrass you (or after, as I’ve learned).Scenes that don’t move the story. If a scene doesn’t advance the plot, deepen a character, or raise the stakes, it’s probably a darling worth killing.

Why the Cut Makes the Story Stronger

Every word you remove sharpens the words that remain. A leaner manuscript reads faster, hits harder, and respects the reader’s time. The cutting room floor isn’t a graveyard—it’s a workshop. What you leave behind on that floor is often the very reason what stays feels so strong.

So as I take the lessons from 1300 Feet Per Second into my next revision and my next project, I’m embracing the trim. Archer’s story deserves a clean, consistent, tightly-woven version of itself, and getting there means being brave enough to cut.Thanks, as always, for reading and for the honest feedback. Keep it coming—it’s making me a better writer.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got some darlings to say goodbye to.

Before You Go…

If this post resonated with you, do me a favor—hit that like button, drop a comment, and share it with a fellow writer who might be wrestling with their own cutting room floor. The more eyes on this blog, the more we can build a community of writers helping each other make those necessary (if painful) cuts. And honestly? I could use all the extra sets of eyes I can get catching those sneaky inconsistencies before they sneak past me again.So tell me in the comments: What’s the hardest darling you’ve ever had to kill? I read and reply to every single one.Until next time—have a wonderful weekend, and above all, keep writing. Those words won’t cut themselves! ✂️📖

The Art of Dialogue: Pacing and Voice That Bring Characters to Life

The Art of Dialogue: Pacing and Voice That Bring Characters to Life

Yesterday we talked about dialogue. Tonight (yes, it is tonight for me here in Texas), I want to talk about pacing, which I promised.

Dialogue is where fiction breathes. It’s the moment readers stop being told about your characters and start experiencing them directly. But writing dialogue that feels alive requires more than just recording how people talk. Two elements separate flat exchanges from unforgettable conversations: pacing and distinct character voice. Let’s explore both.

Why Dialogue Pacing Matters

Pacing is the rhythm of your conversation, controlling how fast or slow it moves, when it lingers, and when it snaps. Get it right, and readers lean in. Get it wrong, and even the most dramatic scene falls flat.Here’s why pacing carries so much weight:It controls tension. Short, clipped exchanges create urgency and conflict. Longer, meandering dialogue creates intimacy or ease. A heated argument written in flowing, elaborate sentences feels wrong because real tension compresses speech.It reveals emotional states. A character who suddenly speaks in fragments is rattled. One who monologues might be nervous, controlling, or evasive. Pacing shows us what characters feel without announcing it.It respects reader attention. Conversations that move too slowly bore readers; ones that move too fast leave them disoriented. Good pacing keeps them engaged and oriented.

Tips for Pacing Dialogue Well

  1. Match rhythm to emotion. When stakes rise, shorten your sentences and trim the fat.
"Where is she?"
"I don't know."
"Where is she?"
"I said I don't ..."
"Don't lie to me."

Notice how the removed dialogue tags and short lines accelerate the scene. Compare that to a calm evening chat, where sentences can stretch and breathe.

  1. Use beats, not just tags. Action beats, those small physical movements, control pace beautifully. They act like punctuation, giving readers a breath and grounding the scene physically.
She set down her coffee. "I'm not going with you."

The beat slows the moment and adds weight to her refusal.

  1. Cut the pleasantries. Real conversations are full of “hello,” “how are you,” and small talk. Fiction usually shouldn’t be. Enter scenes late and leave early; start the dialogue at the interesting part.
  2. Vary your rhythm. A page of nothing but short, punchy lines becomes exhausting; a page of long speeches becomes tedious. Alternate to create a natural, musical flow.
  3. Let silence speak. Sometimes the most powerful pacing tool is what isn’t said. A character who doesn’t answer, or who changes the subject, can be more revealing than any line of dialogue.
  4. Read it aloud. Your ear catches what your eye misses. If you stumble, run out of breath, or feel bored, your readers will too.

Giving Each Character a Unique Voice

Now to an excellent question: how does a writer make each character so distinct that dialogue tags become almost unnecessary? This is one of the true marks of craft. When done well, readers know who’s speaking from the words alone.Here’s how to achieve it:

  1. Give characters different vocabularies. Word choice reveals background, education, personality, and worldview. A retired professor and a teenage skateboarder should not sound the same. Consider a character’s era, region, profession, and interests, all of which shape which words come naturally to them.
  2. Vary sentence structure and length. Some characters speak in long, winding thoughts. Others are terse. One might use precise, grammatically perfect sentences; another rambles and interrupts themselves. This rhythm becomes a fingerprint.
  3. Establish verbal habits and tics. People have patterns: a phrase they overuse, a tendency to answer questions with questions, a habit of apologizing or hedging. Used sparingly, these become instantly recognizable. Just don’t overdo it, or the character becomes a caricature.
  4. Consider what characters talk about. A pragmatist steers conversation toward solutions; a romantic drifts toward feelings; a cynic deflects with jokes. What a character chooses to address reveals as much as how they say it.
  5. Use subtext driven by personality. Different people avoid different truths. One character dodges emotion; another dodges responsibility. How a character doesn’t answer is deeply individual.
  6. Reflect their relationships. People speak differently depending on who they’re addressing. A character might be gentle with a child, guarded with a boss, and sharp with a rival. This dynamic voice adds realism and dimension.

A Quick Test

Try this exercise: write a page of dialogue between two characters, then delete every tag and beat. Give it to a friend, or reread it after a day, and see if you can tell who’s speaking. If you can, you’ve nailed distinct voice. If you can’t, study where the voices blur together and sharpen the differences.

Bringing It Together

Great dialogue is a duet of pacing and voice. Pacing controls the tempo and tension of the scene, while distinct voices ensure that every line points unmistakably to its speaker. Master both, and you can strip away most of your dialogue tags, trusting your characters to carry the conversation on their own. That’s when your dialogue stops feeling written and starts feeling overheard, and that’s exactly where you want your readers to be.

Because I truly care about those who follow this blog and are trying to write here is a demonstration of what I am talking about.

Here’s a scene between a high school teacher and a student. I’ve built in two distinct voices and used pacing shifts to carry the emotional beats. After the scene, I’ll break down exactly what’s doing the work.

The bell had rung ten minutes ago. Marcus still stood by the door, backpack hanging off one shoulder, waiting for the room to empty.

Ms. Okafor didn’t look up from her stack of essays. “You’re going to be late for lunch, Mr. Reyes.”

“Yeah. I know. It’s just.” He shifted his weight. “So I got the paper back.”

“You did.”

“And there’s a big red D on it.”

“There is.” She set down her pen and folded her hands. “Would you like to talk about the D, or would you like to talk about why it doesn’t surprise me?”

He blinked. “The second one, I guess. Wait, no. Both?”

“Sit.”

He sat.

“Your thesis,” she said, “was the finest sentence in that entire paper. Genuinely. I read it twice. And then you spent four pages ignoring it completely.”

“I didn’t ignore it. I like. Circled back to it. At the end.”

“You mentioned it at the end. That is not the same as building toward it. A thesis is a promise, Marcus. You made a promise on page one and then you wandered off to tell me about a movie.”

“It was a relevant movie.”

“It was not.”

“It was kind of relevant.”

She almost smiled. He saw it and pounced.

“See, you agree.”

“I agree that you are charming, which is a completely separate matter from whether you can write.” She slid the paper across the desk. “Rewrite it. Same thesis. Keep the promise this time. I’ll grade the new one instead.”

He stared at the paper. “You’d do that?”

“I already did the hard part. I found the good sentence. You just have to deserve it.”

What’s Doing the Work Distinct vocabulary and sentence structure. Ms. Okafor speaks in complete, controlled sentences. She uses precise diction (“genuinely,” “completely separate matter”) and metaphor (“a thesis is a promise”). Marcus speaks in fragments, filler, and false starts (“It’s just,” “I like. Circled back”). You could delete every dialogue tag in their exchange and still know who’s talking, because their rhythms are opposites.

Pacing that mirrors emotion. The scene opens slow, with hesitation. Marcus stalls; his lines break apart. Once Ms. Okafor takes control (“Sit.” / He sat.), the exchange tightens into quick volleys. Those clipped one and two word lines (“You did.” / “There is.”) accelerate the tension and put her firmly in charge.

Beats instead of tags. Notice how few “he said / she said” tags appear. Physical beats do the work instead: “He shifted his weight,” “She set down her pen and folded her hands,” “He blinked.” Each beat controls tempo and grounds the reader without announcing the speaker.

Subtext driven by personality. Marcus deflects with humor (“It was a relevant movie”) because he’s embarrassed and wants approval. Ms. Okafor withholds warmth strategically, then releases just enough (“She almost smiled”) to keep him hooked. Neither says what they actually feel. He wants to be told he’s smart; she wants him to earn it. The scene never states this outright.

Enter late, leave early. We join after the bell, skipping the greeting entirely, and we exit on the strongest line rather than watching Marcus pack up and leave. The pleasantries are gone, so only the charged moment remains.

Unless there are more comments or questions we will discuss Genre next.

If even one idea here clicked for you, this post did its job.Do me a small favor: hit like, leave a comment with your biggest dialogue struggle, and share this with a fellow writer who’s staring at a blinking cursor tonight.

Writing can feel lonely, and a little encouragement goes a long way.

Follow for more, and remember, every great conversation on the page started with a writer brave enough to try. That’s you.

About the Cover

The Ocean Within is a gripping, science-driven thriller that explores the fragile balance between humanity and the forces of nature. Perfect for fans of Michael Crichton, Andy Weir, and Kim Stanley Robinson, this novel will leave you breathless, and questioning how much we really understand about the world beneath our feet.

Beta Readers, Do you need them?

Beta Readers, Do you need them?

Introduction

When you finish a draft, the hardest part often isn’t writing—it’s getting honest, useful feedback. Beta readers are the trusted eyes and ears who help you see your manuscript from a fresh perspective before it reaches agents, editors, or the public.

Why Beta Readers Are Important

  • Identify blind spots – As the author, you’re deeply immersed in the story. Beta readers can spot plot holes, pacing issues, or confusing world‑building that you’ve missed.
  • Validate emotional impact – They tell you whether a scene actually moves them, whether humor lands, or if romance feels authentic.
  • Gauge market readiness – Experienced beta readers who enjoy your genre can assess whether your book meets readers’ expectations and where it stands against current trends.
  • Boost confidence – Constructive feedback confirms what works well, giving you the confidence to polish and move forward.

How to Find the Right Beta Reader

  1. Define what you need
    • Are you looking for overall plot feedback, line‑editing, or genre‑specific insights?
    • Decide whether you need a single “super‑beta” or a small, diverse group.
  2. Tap into existing communities
    • Online forums: Reddit’s r/BetaReaders, Scribophile, Absolute Write, and Wattpad groups.
    • Social media: Use Twitter/X hashtags like #amreading, #betareaders, or join Facebook groups dedicated to writers in your genre.
    • Local writing groups: Libraries, writing centers, or meetup clubs often have members willing to swap beta work.
  3. Ask for a sample read
    • Send a short excerpt (1–2 chapters). Their responses will reveal how thoughtful and communicative they are.
  4. Set clear expectations
    • Provide a brief questionnaire (e.g., “What’s your favorite sub‑genre?,” “How many hours can you devote each week?”).
    • Agree on a deadline, preferred feedback format, and the level of detail you want.
  5. Consider a reciprocal arrangement
    • Offer to beta‑read their manuscript in return—a win‑win that builds trust and accountability.

Why Matching Genre Matters

  • Understanding of Tropes & Expectations
    Readers familiar with your genre know the conventions that fans love (or hate). They can tell you if your mystery’s twist feels earned or if your fantasy world follows a logical magic system.
  • Target Audience Insight
    A sci‑fi enthusiast will notice inaccuracies in technology or physics that a romance‑focused reader might miss, and vice‑versa. Their feedback helps you fine‑tune the story for the people most likely to buy it.
  • Language & Tone Alignment
    Genre often dictates pacing, dialogue style, and descriptive density. An urban‑fantasy fan will sense whether your prose feels too lyrical for a fast‑paced thriller.
  • Credibility with Publishers
    When you later present a manuscript, you can cite beta feedback from genre‑savvy readers as proof that your work resonates with the intended market—something agents and editors value highly.

Quick Checklist for Selecting a Beta Reader

  • ✅ Reads and enjoys your specific genre (or sub‑genre)
  • ✅ Provides detailed, constructive feedback (not just “I liked it”)
  • ✅ Has a reliable track record (meets deadlines, follows guidelines)
  • ✅ Communicates clearly and respectfully
  • ✅ Is willing to sign a simple NDA if you want confidentiality

Closing Thoughts

Beta readers are more than just early fans; they’re critical partners in shaping a manuscript that shines. By hunting for readers who love your genre, setting crystal‑clear expectations, and fostering a mutually supportive relationship, you’ll turn raw drafts into polished, market‑ready stories.Happy hunting, and may your beta crew help

A Quick Ask Before You Go

If this post helped you feel a little more confident about finding your beta crew, I’d love to hear about it! Drop a comment below and tell me: Are you searching for beta readers right now, or are you the kind of generous soul who loves reading other people’s drafts? Either way, I want to know your story.And if you found this useful, a like goes a long way in helping more writers discover these tips. Better yet, share it with that friend who just typed “The End” on their first draft and has no idea what comes next. They’ll thank you for it.Have a favorite beta-reading tip I didn’t mention, or a lesson you learned the hard way? Share it in the comments so we can all learn from each other. This community grows stronger every time we swap what works.Thanks for reading, and here’s to your next polished, market-ready manuscript. Now go find your people! 📚

As Promised, more about Writing, and less about Things you can’t control.

As Promised, more about Writing, and less about Things you can’t control.

I have heard the terms act, scene, and beat used as if one is better than the other. I tend to follow the Save the Cat philosophy, but, to be clear, let’s take a closer look at what we are talking about.

Acts, Scenes, and Beats: A Writer’s Guide to Story Structure

If you’ve spent any time in writing circles, you’ve heard these three words tossed around, sometimes interchangeably, sometimes as if they’re rival philosophies. Acts, scenes, and beats are the nested building blocks of storytelling, and understanding how they relate (and where they differ) can transform the way you outline, draft, and revise.Let’s break them down, then tackle the real question: which one actually works better, and does the answer change depending on your genre?

The Big Picture: Nested Units of Story

The simplest way to understand these three terms is to think of them as levels of zoom:

  • Acts are the widest lens, the major movements of your entire story.
  • Scenes are the mid-range, individual dramatic units where something happens in a specific time and place.
  • Beats are the closest zoom, the smallest meaningful shifts within a scene.

Think of it like geography: acts are continents, scenes are countries, and beats are cities. You need all three to have a complete map.

What Is an Act?

An act is a large structural division of your story, marked by a major shift in the protagonist’s circumstances, goals, or understanding. Acts give your narrative its overall shape and momentum.The most common framework is the three-act structure:

  • Act I (Setup): Establishes character, world, and the inciting incident. Roughly the first 25 percent.
  • Act II (Confrontation): Rising complications, escalating stakes, and the midpoint reversal. The middle 50 percent.
  • Act III (Resolution): Climax and fallout. The final 25 percent.

Some writers prefer a four-act or five-act model (Shakespeare famously used five), while screenwriters often subdivide Act II into halves to combat the dreaded “saggy middle.” Regardless of the number, acts answer the question: What is the overall trajectory of change?

What Is a Scene?

A scene is a self-contained dramatic unit that takes place in a continuous span of time and (usually) a single location. Every strong scene has its own miniature arc: a character enters with an objective, encounters conflict, and exits with the situation altered, for better or worse.Here is a useful test: if you can summarize what changed between the start and end of a scene, it’s earning its place. A common structure many writers borrow is the scene-and-sequel model:

  • Scene: Goal, then Conflict, then Disaster
  • Sequel: Reaction, then Dilemma, then Decision

Scenes are where readers actually live. They’re the concrete, moment-to-moment experience of your story.

What Is a Beat?

A beat is the smallest unit of dramatic change: a single shift in emotion, intention, or information within a scene. If a scene is a conversation, a beat is the moment the tone changes, whether a confession, a lie exposed, a decision made, or a door slammed.The word “beat” gets used two different ways, which causes a lot of confusion:

  • Micro-beats: The moment-to-moment shifts inside a scene (originating from acting and theater).
  • Story beats: Major plot milestones across the whole narrative, such as “inciting incident,” “midpoint,” and “all is lost.” Frameworks like Save the Cat! and the Hero’s Journey use “beat” this way.

Both meanings are valid; just be clear about which you mean when you’re talking shop with other writers.

So Which One Works Better?

Here’s the honest answer: this is the wrong question.Acts, scenes, and beats aren’t competitors; they’re the same story viewed at different resolutions. Asking whether acts are “better” than scenes is like asking whether the skeleton is better than the muscles. You need the skeleton (acts) for structural integrity, the muscles (scenes) for movement and life, and the nervous system (beats) for the subtle signals that make it all feel real.That said, they serve you best at different stages of the writing process:

  • Use acts when outlining. They keep the big picture coherent and stop you from getting lost.
  • Use scenes when drafting. They give you a manageable, self-contained chunk to write today.
  • Use beats when revising. This is where you diagnose why a scene feels flat, usually because it lacks a clear turn or has too many competing beats.

If a writer forced me to name the most practically useful unit, I’d point to the scene. It’s the level at which readers actually experience your story, and it’s small enough to fix yet large enough to matter. But a great scene inside a broken act structure still leaves a reader unsatisfied, so you can’t neglect any level.

Is This Genre-Specific or Universal?

The concepts are universal. Every narrative form, whether literary fiction, thriller, romance, screenplay, video game, or memoir, uses acts, scenes, and beats at some level, even if the writer never names them. Human beings are wired to understand stories as sequences of change, and these three units simply describe change at different scales.But the application varies significantly by genre and medium:

  • Screenwriting is the most beat- and act-obsessed discipline. Page counts map almost mathematically to structure, and gurus have turned beats into precise blueprints (the “Save the Cat!” beat sheet lists fifteen specific beats with page numbers).
  • Genre fiction (thriller, romance, mystery) tends to lean hard on recognizable act structures and story beats because readers have strong expectations. A romance without a “dark moment” beat feels broken.
  • Literary fiction often loosens or subverts act structure, favoring scene-level craft, interiority, and mood over tidy plot milestones. Beats still exist, but they may be emotional or thematic rather than plot-driven.
  • Short fiction may collapse everything into a single scene with a handful of crucial beats and no formal act breaks at all.
  • Episodic and long-form TV nests structures within structures. Each episode has its own three acts, and each season has a larger arc.

So while the vocabulary travels everywhere, the rigidity of the structure scales with how expectation-driven your genre is. Commercial and visual media reward precise structural discipline, whereas literary and experimental work rewards knowing the rules well enough to break them meaningfully.

The Takeaway

Don’t think of acts, scenes, and beats as options on a menu. Think of them as three lenses on the same story. Master the wide lens to keep your narrative on course, the middle lens to keep readers engaged moment to moment, and the close lens to make every exchange crackle with change.The best writers move fluidly between all three, zooming out to check the shape and zooming in to sharpen the craft. Learn to switch focus deliberately, and you’ll never again stare at a manuscript wondering what’s wrong. You’ll know exactly which lens to look through.

Before You Go

If this breakdown helped you see your story in a new light, do me a favor and put it to work. Open your current draft, pick one scene, and find its beats. You might be surprised by what you discover.And if you found this useful, here’s how you can help this blog reach more writers like you:

  • Like this post so I know the deep-dive craft content is landing.
  • Share it with a writing friend, critique partner, or that one person in your group chat who keeps asking how to fix their saggy middle.
  • Follow the blog so you never miss the next installment. We’ll be tackling scene-level tension, story beats, and outlining methods in the weeks ahead.

Your support keeps these guides coming, and it means the world. Now go write something worth turning the page for.

Happy writing!

My latest release free on KDP for 90 days:

Forty-two thousand people fled a dying Earth. They were told humans built their salvation.They were wrong.Something has been waiting beneath Mars for three billion years, and it just woke up in a seventeen-year-old’s hand.Quiet Dust 👇 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0HHGFQZ2X#SciFi #FirstContact

They Called Me Dumbass

They Called Me Dumbass

Why You Should Look Up the Words You Don’t Know

For years, I thought my name was Dumbass.True story. I heard it in the classroom, on the playground, and at home, and I never once questioned it. When you’re a small child, you don’t argue with the world. You believe what it tells you about yourself. And what the world told me, over and over, was that I was slow, that I was broken, that I was the kid who just didn’t get it.Imagine your own father handing you a broom and a dustpan and telling you that the world needs ditch diggers and janitors too. “Here,” he says. “See if you can figure this out.” That was the ceiling someone else built for me before I was old enough to know I could reach higher.This was the 1960s. Back then, they didn’t diagnose learning disabilities; they labeled the children who had them, and the labels stuck like tar. There were no specialists pulling you aside, no gentle explanations, no understanding that a mind could simply work differently. There was only a single, brutal word for a kid like me, and everyone seemed to agree on it: stupid.So I wore it. I answered to it. For years, I honestly believed that was who I was.

The People Who Saw Me

I made it a point to befriend the school janitor. Many afternoons, I would walk the halls beside him as he went about his work, and yes, I helped him. His name was Jack, and Jack was a noble man. He didn’t treat me like gum stuck to the bottom of his shoe. He treated me like a person. When you’ve been told you’re nothing, you never forget the ones who decide otherwise.But here’s the thing the adults never understood: the problem was never that I couldn’t learn. The problem was that when I looked at text, the words came apart. The letters jumbled together and refused to make sense. It wasn’t until my second attempt at second grade that things began to become clear. I excelled at math, yet when it came to reading, I had nothing. Nada.Still, that math ability told me something important. I could remember almost everything I heard, and I could work through numbers with ease. So I came to a conclusion of my own, one that no teacher ever handed me: I was not stupid. I was an audible learner. My mind worked. It just worked differently.

The Hallway

That realization didn’t make things easy. I struggled, and the frustration ran deeper than words can capture. My third-grade teacher, worn thin by that frustration, would send me out into the hallway during reading so I wouldn’t distract the rest of the class. She was not kind to me, and I felt every bit of it. A child sitting alone on cold tile while everyone else learns to read: that image has never left me.Then came a small accident that changed my life. I got my hands on an old college textbook, and I noticed that some of the lines were highlighted. When I traced a highlighted line with my finger, something remarkable happened. Voilà, the sentence made sense. Giving my eyes a single direction to follow was all I had ever needed.From there, I caught up with my classmates. I graduated early, without a single special education teacher guiding me. And what happened after graduation is a whole different story. I went to the half-price bookstore, bought textbooks in every subject I had done poorly in, and taught myself every last page.The boy they called Dumbass taught himself.

Why This Matters to You

Words matter. They have the power to shape our perceptions, influence our emotions, and drive our actions. They are the very building blocks of thought, and the right word, expertly placed, is worth a paragraph of explanation.

I know this in my bones, because for years I lived without them, locked out of the one thing that could set me free.So when you skip over a word you don’t know, you aren’t saving time. You are leaving a small door closed. You are choosing not to grow.

Right now, I’m writing a dystopian science fiction novel centered on AI, and I use a great many technical terms in it.

Terms I understand. From fiction to neurology, from medical pathology to engineering, I spent years working as an engineer in the Medical Center. I remember everything I was exposed to there, including autopsies, surgeries, and much more. From music to flying, the vocabulary is real, and it is mine. Every word earned.

So when you’re reading this book on Kindle and you reach a word you don’t know, look it up. If you buy the print version (title to be announced, so follow for updates), you’ll find a glossary waiting in the back. Please use it.

We all have gifts, and we all have deficits. Not everyone shares the same intellect, and that is simply a fact, though it can feel like a hard one. But dehumanizing people because of it is wrong. We are all worthy of dignity, and we would all do well to remember that.

The kid in the hallway grew up. And he still believes in the power of a single, well-understood word. Currently I have close to thirty published novels and have written over 100,000,000 words. Did my third grade teacher telling me that the lights were on and nobody was home, help or hurt? You decide.

Before You Go

If any part of this story spoke to you, don’t let it be the end. Let it be the beginning.

Follow for updates on the book, including the title reveal and release date. Share this post with someone who needs to hear that a different mind is not a broken one. Comment below and tell me: what is a word you looked up recently, or a person like my Jack who refused to give up on you? I read every one.Best.

The Person Across the Aisle Isn’t Your Enemy

The Person Across the Aisle Isn’t Your Enemy

We’ve all felt it. That flash of contempt when someone mentions who they voted for. The eye-roll. The quiet recalculation of a person we thought we knew. In a single moment, a friend, a neighbor, a family member gets sorted into a box marked them. I want to make a case for putting down that reflex, not because it’s polite, but because it’s the truth. The person who votes differently than you is not stupid, not evil, and not beyond understanding. More often than not, they’re something far more relatable: a human being doing their best with the information they’ve been handed.

Garbage In, Garbage Out

Programmers have an old saying: garbage in, garbage out. Feed a system bad data and it will produce bad results, no matter how sophisticated it is. Your mind works the same way. Here’s the uncomfortable part: almost none of us choose our information diet as freely as we think. We inherit it. We drift into it. We follow the sources that feel comfortable, that confirm what we already suspect, that give us the satisfying jolt of being right. If you consume only left-leaning media and dismiss everything else as propaganda, you will build a mental model of the right that is a caricature. If you consume only right-leaning media and wave away the rest as lies, you’ll do the same in reverse. Both people walk away certain, and both are working from incomplete pictures painted by someone else. The tragedy isn’t that we disagree. Healthy societies have always disagreed. The tragedy is that we’ve stopped believing the other side is even reasoning. We’ve concluded they must be broken.

Who Benefits From Your Contempt?

Ask yourself a simple question: who profits when you hate your neighbor? Not you. Not your community. Division is a business model and a political strategy. Outrage drives clicks. Fear drives donations. A frightened, angry, divided public is easy to sell to and easy to steer. There are people (call them puppet masters, call them algorithms, call them incentive structures) for whom your contempt is a resource to be mined. When you dehumanize the other side, you’re not winning. You’re doing the exact job the manipulators need done. You’ve become an unpaid employee of the outrage machine. The moment you realize this, something shifts. That person you were about to write off? They may be a victim of the same manipulation you are. You’re not fighting each other. You’re both being played.

Don’t Feed the Comment Section

Watch the comments under any breaking news clip or live stream and you will see the same pattern: within seconds, before anyone could possibly know what happened, the thread is already a brawl. That is not an accident, and it is not a fair sample of your countrymen. Some of those accounts are bots. Some are paid. Some belong to real people who have learned that cruelty is the fastest way to be seen. All of them are rewarded for it, because the platform measures success in replies, and nothing generates replies like an insult aimed at somebody’s family, faith, or politics. The vitriol is not a flaw in the comment section; it is the product.

So remember what a comment section is not. It is not the public. It is not your neighborhood. It is not a debate. It is a slot machine that pays out in adrenaline, and the house always wins. Do not engage. Do not correct the obvious troll, do not answer the bait, and do not draft the devastating reply you will reread six times before you post it. You will not change that account’s mind, because there may not be a mind behind it, and the algorithm counts your outrage as engagement either way. Close the tab instead. Then go say something generous to an actual person, in a place where your words land on someone who can be reached.

Forgiveness Is Not Agreement

Let me be clear about what I’m not saying. Forgiveness doesn’t mean you abandon your convictions. It doesn’t mean every idea is equally valid or that we should stop debating what’s true and good. Some ideas are better than others, and that matters. What forgiveness does mean is separating the idea from the person. You can think someone is deeply wrong and still treat them as fully human. You can argue passionately and still assume they arrived at their view honestly. You can hold your ground without grinding someone into the dirt. Contempt closes minds, including your own. Curiosity opens them.

A Plan to Reduce the Friction

Good intentions fade fast. So here’s a concrete, doable plan for lowering the temperature in your own corner of the world.

  1. Audit your information diet. For one week, notice where your news comes from. Is it one perspective? Add at least one credible source from the “other side,” not to convert you, but to understand how reasonable people reach different conclusions.
  2. Steel-man before you strike. Before criticizing an opposing view, state it so accurately that someone who holds it would say, “Yes, that’s exactly what I mean.” If you can’t, you don’t understand it well enough to reject it yet.
  3. Ask one more question. When you disagree, resist the counterpunch. Instead ask: “What experience led you to see it that way?” People rarely hold views for no reason. Find the reason and you’ll find the human.
  4. Draw a hard line at dehumanization. Disagree with ideas all day long. But the instant you catch yourself thinking a whole group is stupid, subhuman, or beyond hope: stop. That’s the manipulation working. Name it and reject it.
  5. Never argue in the comment section. Scroll past it. That thread is not a conversation, and half of it may not even be human. If something you read there makes your chest tighten, that is the design working, so close the tab and take the point up with a real person instead.
  6. Protect relationships over arguments. Before a heated conversation, ask yourself: Do I want to be right, or do I want to keep this person in my life? You can often do both, but only if the relationship comes first.
  7. Practice one act of grace a week. Compliment someone you disagree with. Thank a neighbor whose sign you’d never put in your yard. Small acts of goodwill rehumanize faster than any argument.
  8. Model it publicly. Be the person who refuses to pile on. When everyone else is dunking, be the one who says, “I disagree, but I get where you’re coming from.” Grace is contagious. So is cruelty. Choose which one you spread.

The World They Don’t Want You to Build

Imagine a dinner table where people vote differently and still pass the potatoes with a smile. Imagine a comment section where someone changes their mind because they were treated with dignity instead of ridicule. Imagine looking at the person across the aisle and seeing not an enemy, but a fellow traveler who got fed a different set of stories. That world is quieter, kinder, and far harder to manipulate. Which is exactly why it’s worth building. It starts with a single decision, available to you right now: the next person who votes differently, I will treat with respect. Not because they’ve earned it. Because it’s who you’ve decided to be, and because refusing to hate is the most quietly rebellious thing you can do in an age that profits from your rage.

Gods and Insects, yes it feels like that.

Gods and Insects, yes it feels like that.

The Day a Leaky Truck Inspired a Novel: The Story Behind Gods and Insects

In the late 1900s, I was spending a significant amount of time on the road, driving nearly 1,000 miles a week. Back then, I lived in Houston, a city notorious for its unpredictable weather and sprawling roadways. One of the most well-known highways in Houston is Loop 610, a giant ring encircling the city. It was (and still is) a requirement that hazardous material trucks use the loop instead of cutting through the downtown area. This rule made sense, given the risks involved in transporting dangerous substances through such a densely populated area. But one particular day on the loop changed the trajectory of my life in the most unexpected way.


A Rainstorm, a Leaky Truck, and a Spark of Curiosity

Houston weather is nothing if not unpredictable. You can be driving under sunny skies one minute and find yourself in the middle of a torrential downpour the next, and that’s exactly what happened on this day. As I made my way around Loop 610, following a chemical transport truck, the skies opened up. The rain poured down, and visibility became challenging. Yet, something about that truck caught my attention.There was an unusual amount of water draining from the back of the vehicle…far more than seemed normal, even during a rainstorm this heavy. My curiosity got the better of me. Why was there so much water spilling from this truck? Was it just rain runoff, or was there something else going on?Instead of continuing on my usual route through town via Highway 59, I decided to follow the truck, keeping a safe distance. I watched as the rain let up and the sun came out again. But here’s the strange part: the water draining from the truck didn’t stop. It kept flowing as if the storm had never ended.


A Suspicious Pattern and a Moment of Realization

The truck didn’t return to Highway 59 after completing its loop around the city. Instead, it kept circling. I followed it for a while, trying to make sense of what I was seeing. Was something leaking? Was the truck dispersing something intentionally? After completing more than one full loop around the city, I realized I’d wasted enough time, and likely exposed myself to who-knows-what. I decided to let it go and head home.But the experience stuck with me. Long after I stopped following that truck, I couldn’t shake the questions from my mind. What could have been leaking from that vehicle? Was it an accident, or something more sinister? The idea kept nagging at me, and before I knew it, a story began to form in my imagination. That day, the seed for my novel Gods and Insects was planted.


From a Leaky Truck to a Novel 30 Years Later

It took over three decades for the story to fully come to life. Gods and Insects, like my previous novel The Corrected City, sat in the proverbial file cabinet for years, stored away on an old hard drive while life moved on. But writing has always been my craft, my passion. With over 100,000,000 words written (yes, that’s with an M!), my skills have sharpened over time, and I finally felt ready to breathe new life into this story.The result? A novel born from a real-life moment of curiosity, suspense, and a little bit of danger. Gods and Insects is now available, and for the next 90 days, it’s free to read on Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP).


Why You Should Give Gods and Insects a Read

Sometimes, inspiration strikes in the most unexpected ways. For me, it was a mysterious chemical truck, a rainstorm, and a moment of curiosity that I couldn’t ignore. The resulting novel dives into themes of mystery, danger, and the unknown…born from a real-life experience that could have ended very differently.If you’re a fan of suspenseful, thought-provoking stories, I think you’ll find Gods and Insects well worth your time. Plus, it’s free on KDP right now, so there’s no excuse not to dive in and experience the tale for yourself.Enjoy the read, and remember, inspiration can strike when you least expect it. Sometimes, all it takes is a leaky truck on a rainy day to spark a story worth telling.

Your Turn: Join the Conversation and Dive Into Gods and Insects

Now that you’ve heard the story behind the story, I’d love to hear from you!

💬 Drop a Comment Below

Have you ever had a moment of curiosity that stuck with you for years? Maybe an unusual encounter, a strange sight, or a “what if” question that wouldn’t leave your mind? Share your story in the comments. I read every single one, and who knows, your experience might just inspire my next novel! I’d also love to hear your thoughts on this piece. Did the mystery of that leaky chemical truck grab your attention? What do you think was really going on?

📖 Grab Your Free Copy of Gods and Insects

Ready to see where that rainy day in Houston led? For the next 90 days, Gods and Insects is completely FREE on Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP). That’s right: zero cost, all suspense. Whether you’re a longtime sci-fi fan, a lover of mystery and intrigue, or someone who enjoys a story with real-world roots, this novel has something for you.👉 [Click here to download your free copy today!] (Insert your KDP link)Don’t wait. This free offer won’t last forever. Once the 90 days are up, the opportunity is gone.

⭐ Loved It? Leave a Review!

Here’s the thing about being an indie author: reviews are our lifeblood. They help other readers discover the book, they boost visibility on Amazon, and honestly? They mean the world to writers like me who’ve poured decades into their craft.So if you read Gods and Insects and enjoy it (or even if you have constructive thoughts to share), please take just two minutes to leave an honest review on Amazon. It doesn’t have to be long. Even a sentence or two makes a huge difference. Your words could be the reason another reader picks up this book and gets pulled into the mystery.


To recap:

  1. 💬 Comment below with your thoughts or your own “curious moment” story.
  2. 📖 Download Gods and Insects for FREE on KDP (limited time!).
  3. ⭐ Leave an honest review after you read it.

Thank you for being part of this journey. Every reader, every comment, and every review helps keep the stories coming. Now go grab that book, and happy reading! 🚚💧📚

A Story to Start or End with Wheels

A Story to Start or End with Wheels

A story from a prompt:

Imagine this: a room filled with the hum of creativity, the scratching of pens against paper, and the occasional burst of laughter as ideas collide.

That’s where you’ll find me, well by zoom since I moved to the country, a proud director of our small but fiercely passionate Writing Group in my old hometown.

This week? Oh, this week is special. The challenge is simple yet brimming with possibility: craft a story that begins or ends with a bicycle.

A single object, two wheels, infinite potential. Will it be a tale of freedom, of mystery, or perhaps of heartbreak?

The group is ready to dig deep, to wrestle with their imaginations and see where the humble bicycle takes them.And you?

You’re about to get a front-row seat to the magic that unfolds. Buckle up (or should I say, hop on?). The journey is just about to begin.

The following is my story from a somewhat childhood memory, and an imagination, as a girl with freckles and red hair is a part of the story.

The Bicycle and the Bay Mare

The summer Thomas turned twelve, the world smelled of hot asphalt and cut grass, and his blue Schwinn bicycle was the finest thing he owned.

His father had rescued it from a yard sale for eight dollars, sanded off the rust, and painted it the color of a robin’s egg.

Thomas rode it everywhere: to the creek, to the library, to the little store on Miller Road where Mrs. Halvorsen sold penny candy that hadn’t cost a penny in thirty years.

That Tuesday afternoon in July, he was flying down Ridgewood Lane with a paper bag of licorice ropes bouncing in his front basket.

The wind pulled at his hair. His legs pumped in perfect rhythm. He was, he decided, the fastest boy in the county, possibly the state, possibly the world.

He was thinking exactly this when a horse came around the bend.

It was enormous, a mountain of muscle and gleaming chestnut hide, hooves hammering the pavement like a blacksmith’s anvil.

Thomas had just enough time to see the flash of a red-gold mane, both the horse’s and the rider’s, before he yanked his handlebars sideways and sailed straight into Mr. Peterson’s hedge.

The Schwinn went one way. Thomas went another. The licorice went everywhere.

“Oh my gosh, are you alive?”

A face appeared above him, upside down through the tangle of privet leaves. Freckles. Green eyes. Hair the color of a maple tree in October, spilling down in wild waves that seemed to catch every scrap of sunlight and hold it hostage.

“I think so,” Thomas managed. A leaf was in his mouth. He spit it out with what he hoped was dignity.

“I am so sorry. Dolly spooked at a plastic bag. She’s a total drama queen about plastic bags, and I couldn’t get her to …”

The girl paused, tilting her head. “You’re bleeding.”

Thomas touched his elbow. He was, indeed, bleeding. It seemed a small price to pay for continuing to be looked at by this person.

“I’m Ellen,” she said, offering a hand streaked with horse sweat and dust.

“Ellen Brennan. We just moved into the yellow house on Fox Hollow.”

“Thomas,” he said. His voice came out slightly strangled.

“Thomas Kepler.”

She helped him up, retrieved his bicycle (which had a new and interesting bend in the front fender), and gathered up as many licorice ropes as could be salvaged.

The horse, Dolly, watched all of this with the mild, unimpressed expression of a creature who had caused chaos and considered her work done.

“Come by the stable sometime,” Ellen said, swinging back into the saddle with an ease that struck Thomas as miraculous.

She clicked her tongue, and Dolly wheeled around and cantered off, and Thomas stood in the middle of Ridgewood Lane holding a bent bicycle and a bag of dirty licorice, and knew with absolute certainty that his life had changed.

He waited three days. Three days felt appropriately casual.

Three days felt like a boy who had many important things to do and only happened, in passing, to remember there was a stable on Fox Hollow.

In truth, he thought about it every waking minute.

The Brennan place was set back from the road behind a row of oaks, with a weathered red barn and a paddock ringed by white fencing that had gone gray at the posts.

Thomas leaned his Schwinn against a fence rail and walked toward the barn, and there, in the shadowed doorway, was Ellen, not in the jodhpurs and boots he’d half-expected, but in cutoff jeans and a t-shirt with a hole in the shoulder, mucking a stall with a pitchfork nearly as tall as she was.

“You came!” she said, and her whole face lit up in a way that made Thomas’s ears go hot.

“Come meet everybody.”

Everybody, it turned out, was not just Dolly.

There was Dolly, yes, the chestnut mare from the road, but also a stocky black gelding named Pepper, a spotted pony called Bandit who had, according to Ellen, “opinions,” and an ancient white horse named Mr. Biscuit who was thirty-one years old and, Ellen said solemnly, the finest gentleman she’d ever known.

Thomas offered his palm the way Ellen showed him, flat and steady, and Mr. Biscuit breathed onto it with a warm, hay-scented sigh.

Something inside Thomas’s chest turned over.

“You should ride,” Ellen said.

“I don’t know how.”

“That,” she said, “is exactly why you should learn.”

He came back the next day. And the day after.

Ellen was a patient teacher and a merciless one.

She made him groom Mr. Biscuit for a full week before she’d let him sit on the old horse’s back, and even then, only at a walk, in circles, in the corral, while she called out corrections from the fence.

“Heels down, Thomas!”

“They are down!”

“Down like you mean it. Like gravity is your personal friend.”

He fell off twice. The first time he landed in soft dirt and Ellen laughed so hard she had to sit down. The second time he landed in something considerably less soft, and Ellen laughed so hard she cried, and Thomas found that he didn’t mind at all, because when she laughed her whole face crinkled up and her freckles danced.

By August he could trot without bouncing.

By September he could post.

By the time the leaves turned, Ellen let him ride Pepper, and the two of them went out along the trails behind the Brennan property, ducking under low branches, Dolly and Pepper’s hooves whispering through the fallen leaves.

The Schwinn stayed in the yard, propped against the fence.

Years unfolded the way years do: quickly, when you look back at them; slowly, when you’re inside them.

Thomas grew tall and lean, with a rider’s hands and a rider’s seat.

Ellen grew into her freckles.

They rode through four autumns and three summers together, through a hundred sunsets over the ridge, through a season when Mr. Biscuit lay down in his stall and did not get up, and Thomas held Ellen while she cried into his shoulder for the finest gentleman she’d ever known.

There was the winter Ellen’s father lost his job and she came to school with red-rimmed eyes, and Thomas learned that sometimes the most useful thing a person could do was simply be present, and quiet, and steady, the way Mr. Biscuit had once been for both of them.

There was the spring Thomas’s mother got sick, and Ellen rode over on Dolly every single afternoon, and sat with him on the porch, and didn’t try to fix anything, because some things can’t be fixed, only witnessed.

There was the first kiss, under the oak tree by the corral, when Thomas was seventeen and Ellen was seventeen and a half and had never let him forget the half.

There was the college years, and the long-distance letters, and the summer they both came home and knew, without saying it, that they were done pretending to be uncertain.

There was a small wedding in the Brennan’s front pasture, with folding chairs borrowed from the church and Dolly, gone gray around the muzzle now, watching over the fence like a chaperone.

The blue Schwinn stayed leaned against the fence rail where Thomas had first left it.

At first, someone would move it. Ellen’s father, when he mowed; Thomas himself, when he remembered. But the years wore on, and the bicycle wore down. The tires went flat. The chain went orange with rust. Ivy found the wheels first, then the frame. A morning glory climbed the handlebars one summer and never really left.

A robin nested in the basket the year Ellen turned twenty-four, and the year after that, and the year after that.

Nobody moved it anymore. It had become part of the fence, part of the yard, part of the place. A blue-green ghost of the boy who had once been the fastest in the county, possibly the state, possibly the world.

It is a Saturday afternoon in late June, and Thomas is thirty-four years old.

He and Ellen are down by the lake behind what used to be her parents’ farm and is now, deed and mortgage and all, theirs.

A red plaid blanket is spread on the grass beneath the willow. The picnic basket, her grandmother’s, the wicker frayed at the corners, one hinge held together with baling wire, sits open and mostly empty.

There are the last crusts of a sandwich. A jar with two swallows of lemonade. A peach with two bites taken out of it, one small (hers) and one large (his).

Not far off, in the shallow slope of the pasture, two horses graze in the slow, unhurried way of horses who know they are home.

One is a bay mare with a white star. The other is a chestnut gelding whose sire, if you traced the papers back far enough, was a mare named Dolly.

Ellen is lying on her back with her head in Thomas’s lap. Her red hair, still absurd, still catching every scrap of sunlight it can find, is spread across his knee. He is twirling a piece of it around his finger, the way he has been doing for fifteen years, the way he suspects he will still be doing when they are eighty.

“Do you remember,” she says, eyes closed, “the licorice?”

“I remember the licorice.”

“It was disgusting. The licorice.”

“It was covered in gravel.”

“And you ate it anyway.”

“I did not.”

“You did. I saw you. You ate a piece with a leaf stuck to it because you were trying to seem casual.”

Thomas laughs. Somewhere up by the house, on the other side of the pasture, leaning against a fence rail nobody has repainted in twenty years, a blue Schwinn bicycle is quietly dissolving into the landscape. Weeds have grown up through its spokes. A morning glory is in bloom on its handlebars. If you didn’t know it had once been a bicycle, you might not guess.

If you did know, you might think it looked less like a ruin and more like a small, patient monument. To a boy who rode too fast around a corner. To a girl on a horse who couldn’t stop. To the exact and unrepeatable accident of two lives colliding on a summer afternoon and choosing, ever after, not to come apart.

Ellen opens her eyes and looks up at him. The freckles are still there. The green eyes are still there. Everything, somehow, is still there.

“Thomas,” she says.

“Yes.”

“I’m really glad you didn’t die in that hedge.”

He bends down and kisses her forehead. The horses graze. The lake laps at the shore. The picnic basket holds its small ruins with dignity.

“Me too,” he says. “Me too.”

A Whisper from the Past, a Chance at Redemption

If that little taste of my writing intrigued you, then you won’t want to miss my novel, Nothing But Time.It begins with a letter…a letter that arrives three weeks after Jack Harper stopped mattering.Jack gave everything to his career.

His marriage slipped through his fingers. His daughter grew up without him. Forty-one years of sunsets went unwatched, and the roses? Never smelled.

Now retired, redundant, and utterly adrift, Jack is left wondering if it was all worth it.

Then, out of nowhere, he inherits an old farmhouse from Ed, the friend who once tried to warn him.

Ed, who escaped to Vermont years ago, died alone, and left Jack with one simple instruction:

“Tend the roses. Stop and smell them. Live.”

But the farmhouse isn’t what it seems. The radio crackles with broadcasts from 1943. The roses bloom when Jack kneels in the soil. And at the edge of the orchard, Ed keeps appearing—smiling, waiting, calling Jack to finally understand what he refused to see all those years.Some second chances come with instructions. Some come with ghosts.

Are you ready to discover which one Jack will choose?

Nothing But Time

Your Voice Matters

If this story resonated with you, don’t hold back, leave a comment! 

Your thoughts, your reactions, and your support are what keep this journey alive. I know you’re out there, and your presence means everything to me.

Go ahead, share your voice, and let’s keep this connection alive.
Have a blessed day…you’re the reason I do this.

-Scott

“From 9/11 to Flock Cameras: The Dystopian Novel I Started 15 Years Ago”

“From 9/11 to Flock Cameras: The Dystopian Novel I Started 15 Years Ago”

September 9, 2011, started like any other day. While stuck at a traffic light, I was on the phone with our New York office. Something happened; they put me on hold, and as I drove to the Dallas office, I listened to the world change. We can argue about the rumors that still surround Building 7, but suffice it to say, the world changed.

My normal way of dealing with grief is not to drone on about it with friends or family. My way is to write about it. If you follow me at all, you have no doubt read my blog post about writing letters or emails to people who are, let’s say, less than congenial. I use expletives and what have you to get the anger out of me and into the digital ethos, and of course, as much as I want to, I never send it. Burning bridges and being known as a hothead will get you nowhere.

Fast-forward six weeks after 9/11 and at least 3,000 deaths by “some people who did some things.” Bush and his administration enacted the Patriot Act, which is still alive and well today. The things those people did allowed our government to strip away some of our rights, trading them for safety. “Do you feel safe?”

Fast-forward to the Flock cameras, data centers, Alexa devices, smartphones, and, of course, drones. Do you feel safe?

Those Flock cameras, I learned, have microphones.

So, while spending these summer months of 100-plus-degree days clearing out old computer hardware, I found that file from 2011. I had started a book about a fictional city where a horrible event occurred, and much like the Patriot Act, what we see today closely resembles what I put into my book. Being a fan of Orwell, I wrote a dystopian near-future novel that is all but ready for one last edit.

Stay tuned for more updates and for when the book drops.

I am thinking about putting it on KDP Unlimited for those of you who can read it for free. Follow, hit that like button, and comment below if you have ideas you would like to share.Best,

Here is a link to my current books on Amazon.