Okay, Candace, pull up a chair and grab a cup of coffee, because this story’s got more twists than one of my thrillers. You’re diving into a rabbit hole that’s either leading to one of the most mind-blowing conspiracy theories of all time, think bigger than the single-bullet theory that still haunts JFK discussions, or, and this is where my money lies, someone’s feeding you breadcrumbs laced with arsenic to throw you off the trail and discredit you. And here’s why I think so.
So, let’s talk about that video. Yeah… I’ve seen it. Honestly, I wish I hadn’t. It sticks in my mind like a bad scene I wrote at 2 a.m. that I can’t unsee. But here’s the thing, no sniper worth their salt would be aiming for Charlie’s neck. That’s just not how these folks operate. Trust me, I write about these guys for a living. What they’re trained to hit is center mass; it’s the most significant, most reliable target. If they’re feeling fancy, or that he might have a bulletproof vest on, maybe they’ll go for a headshot, and when they do, it’s typically between the eyes. Period.
But a neck shot? That screams “accidental” or “inexperienced.” From what I’ve pieced together, the shooter was probably aiming for a headshot, JFK-style. And here’s where it gets even juicier: the perp and their family were hunters. Now, if you know hunters—and I’ve sat around enough campfires to hear these guys talk shop—they don’t usually roll with factory bullets straight off the shelf. No, they’re all about those custom reloads. It’s practically a badge of honor. You know the type: “I calibrated this one myself for the perfect takedown.” So, it’s highly likely the bullets used here were reloads, designed for something very specific.
And here’s where the FBI comes in. They’ve got the bullets, and believe me, they’ve already dissected them like a frog in high school biology. They know if those rounds were reloaded, what kind of powder was used, how much of it, and even the weight of the bullets. They probably even know what the shooter had for breakfast that morning —okay, maybe not —but you get the point.
Now, let’s play detective for a second. If the shooter was using a varmint load meant for small critters like coyotes or prairie dogs, you’ve got a light bullet, say 110 grains, that’s moving fast but drops like a rock. That could explain why the shot didn’t exit Charlie’s body. With a varmint round, you’re looking at 5 to 8 inches of drop, plus a couple more inches of wind drift, depending on the conditions. Makes sense, right?
But if we’re talking standard loads, something heavier, like 150 to 165 grains, the drop would be less, maybe around 4 inches. Which, let’s be real, would make the shooter a lousy shot if they missed their mark that badly. And even then, it doesn’t explain the lack of an exit wound. It’s like trying to solve a puzzle where half the pieces are missing.
Here’s the kicker, though: everything I’m telling you is out there, online, ripe for the picking. It’s like an open buffet for anyone willing to dig deep enough. The FBI has the details—they’re just not sharing them with the rest of us mere mortals. Typical, right?
So, Candace, I hope this adds a little clarity—or at least some food for thought. BTW, I have followed Charlie for several years, and I admired him.
Best,
Scott
- @RealCandaceO










You must be logged in to post a comment.