Category: opinion

Beta Readers, Do you need them?

Beta Readers, Do you need them?

Introduction

When you finish a draft, the hardest part often isn’t writing—it’s getting honest, useful feedback. Beta readers are the trusted eyes and ears who help you see your manuscript from a fresh perspective before it reaches agents, editors, or the public.

Why Beta Readers Are Important

  • Identify blind spots – As the author, you’re deeply immersed in the story. Beta readers can spot plot holes, pacing issues, or confusing world‑building that you’ve missed.
  • Validate emotional impact – They tell you whether a scene actually moves them, whether humor lands, or if romance feels authentic.
  • Gauge market readiness – Experienced beta readers who enjoy your genre can assess whether your book meets readers’ expectations and where it stands against current trends.
  • Boost confidence – Constructive feedback confirms what works well, giving you the confidence to polish and move forward.

How to Find the Right Beta Reader

  1. Define what you need
    • Are you looking for overall plot feedback, line‑editing, or genre‑specific insights?
    • Decide whether you need a single “super‑beta” or a small, diverse group.
  2. Tap into existing communities
    • Online forums: Reddit’s r/BetaReaders, Scribophile, Absolute Write, and Wattpad groups.
    • Social media: Use Twitter/X hashtags like #amreading, #betareaders, or join Facebook groups dedicated to writers in your genre.
    • Local writing groups: Libraries, writing centers, or meetup clubs often have members willing to swap beta work.
  3. Ask for a sample read
    • Send a short excerpt (1–2 chapters). Their responses will reveal how thoughtful and communicative they are.
  4. Set clear expectations
    • Provide a brief questionnaire (e.g., “What’s your favorite sub‑genre?,” “How many hours can you devote each week?”).
    • Agree on a deadline, preferred feedback format, and the level of detail you want.
  5. Consider a reciprocal arrangement
    • Offer to beta‑read their manuscript in return—a win‑win that builds trust and accountability.

Why Matching Genre Matters

  • Understanding of Tropes & Expectations
    Readers familiar with your genre know the conventions that fans love (or hate). They can tell you if your mystery’s twist feels earned or if your fantasy world follows a logical magic system.
  • Target Audience Insight
    A sci‑fi enthusiast will notice inaccuracies in technology or physics that a romance‑focused reader might miss, and vice‑versa. Their feedback helps you fine‑tune the story for the people most likely to buy it.
  • Language & Tone Alignment
    Genre often dictates pacing, dialogue style, and descriptive density. An urban‑fantasy fan will sense whether your prose feels too lyrical for a fast‑paced thriller.
  • Credibility with Publishers
    When you later present a manuscript, you can cite beta feedback from genre‑savvy readers as proof that your work resonates with the intended market—something agents and editors value highly.

Quick Checklist for Selecting a Beta Reader

  • ✅ Reads and enjoys your specific genre (or sub‑genre)
  • ✅ Provides detailed, constructive feedback (not just “I liked it”)
  • ✅ Has a reliable track record (meets deadlines, follows guidelines)
  • ✅ Communicates clearly and respectfully
  • ✅ Is willing to sign a simple NDA if you want confidentiality

Closing Thoughts

Beta readers are more than just early fans; they’re critical partners in shaping a manuscript that shines. By hunting for readers who love your genre, setting crystal‑clear expectations, and fostering a mutually supportive relationship, you’ll turn raw drafts into polished, market‑ready stories.Happy hunting, and may your beta crew help

A Quick Ask Before You Go

If this post helped you feel a little more confident about finding your beta crew, I’d love to hear about it! Drop a comment below and tell me: Are you searching for beta readers right now, or are you the kind of generous soul who loves reading other people’s drafts? Either way, I want to know your story.And if you found this useful, a like goes a long way in helping more writers discover these tips. Better yet, share it with that friend who just typed “The End” on their first draft and has no idea what comes next. They’ll thank you for it.Have a favorite beta-reading tip I didn’t mention, or a lesson you learned the hard way? Share it in the comments so we can all learn from each other. This community grows stronger every time we swap what works.Thanks for reading, and here’s to your next polished, market-ready manuscript. Now go find your people! 📚

“White Noise” to Flock in Florida

“White Noise” to Flock in Florida

🚨 Sheriff, Hear Me Out: Why “They Only Track Cars” Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story on Flock Cameras

I have a lot of respect for the Polk County Sheriff. He’s earned it. So when he recently offered his take on Flock cameras, essentially arguing that critics are overreacting because “they only track cars”…I paid attention. I always do when someone I respect weighs in on an issue I care about.But respectfully, Sheriff: you’re wrong on this one. And I think the details matter enough that it’s worth walking through exactly why. Perhaps you should get some coffee….


“They Only Track Cars”—Then Why Are They in the Park?

Here’s my first problem with that argument: if these cameras only track cars, why are they pointed at parks where cars don’t go? Why are they positioned along walking paths where the only thing passing by is a person on foot, a stroller, or a dog on a leash?That’s not a rhetorical question. It’s a factual inconsistency in the “just cars” defense. If the technology were strictly limited to vehicle tracking, we wouldn’t see it deployed in pedestrian-only spaces. The placement alone tells you the scope of what’s being captured is broader than the official talking point suggests.And that’s before we even get to what these cameras are capable of, versus what they’re currently doing.


AI Is Already There. The Microphones Just Aren’t Turned On. Yet, well maybe not turned on. They are called Raven.

This is the part that should give everyone pause, regardless of where you stand politically: these are AI-driven systems, and not all of the features have been activated—yet.The microphone capability, for example, exists in the hardware. It’s just not turned on right now.That “right now” is doing a lot of work in that sentence. Because here’s the thing about surveillance infrastructure: once it’s built, once it’s installed, once it’s normalized in your community, the switch from “capability that exists but isn’t used” to “capability that is now active” is a policy decision—not a technical one. And policy decisions are made by people. People we elect.Which brings me to the real heart of my disagreement.


Elections Have Consequences. Look at New York.

Sheriff, I know you’re a good actor operating this technology responsibly right now. I believe that. But here’s the uncomfortable truth: the safeguards on this technology aren’t really safeguards—they’re the personal restraint of whoever currently holds power.Today, we have semi-reliable guardrails around traffic light cameras and police body cameras. Not perfect, but functional enough that most people trust the system isn’t being weaponized against them personally. Those guardrails didn’t happen by accident—they were built over years of legal battles, public pressure, and hard-won policy fights.Flock cameras don’t have that history. They don’t have that infrastructure of accountability. What they have is enormous, largely untested capability—deployed before the legal and regulatory framework caught up to it.And that’s where elections come in. Look at New York. Look at how quickly the tenor of law enforcement priorities can shift when a different administration takes office, when a different DA is elected, when a different set of political incentives suddenly control the levers of power.Now ask yourself: what happens when a technology that was previously “neutered” by a responsible operator—someone like you, Sheriff—gets handed to someone who isn’t? What happens when a candidate wins office specifically because they promised to use every tool available, with no restraint, against people they’ve decided are enemies?This isn’t hypothetical paranoia. It’s the entire history of surveillance technology in America. Every tool built with good intentions has, at some point, been used by someone with bad ones. The question was never whether Flock cameras could be misused—it’s when, and by whom.That’s the slippery slope. And once you’re on it, there’s no walking it back. You can’t un-invent the microphone in the camera. You can’t un-train the AI model. You can only hope the person controlling it stays reasonable forever. That’s not a safeguard. That’s a gamble.


I’ll Give You This Much: The Tech Is Outpacing the Law

I want to be fair here, Sheriff, because I think you raise a real point even if I disagree with your conclusion: the technology absolutely is outpacing the laws meant to govern it.That’s not a defense of Flock cameras—it’s actually the core of my argument against rushing to deploy them without guardrails first. The right sequence isn’t “deploy now, regulate later.” It’s “regulate first, then deploy.” Once these systems are active, embedded, and normalized across thousands of communities, the political will to roll back capabilities—or to legislate meaningful restrictions—evaporates. It’s far easier to prevent a surveillance state from being built than to dismantle one after the fact.Before these systems go fully active—before every bell and whistle gets switched on—the guardrails need to be in place. Not after. Not “we’ll figure it out once problems arise.” Before.


And Let’s Not Forget: This Is a Private Company Making Bank

Here’s another wrinkle worth sitting with: Flock Safety is a private company, and it’s profiting handsomely from this expansion.We’ve seen this movie before. Remember Ring? A private company selling home security cameras that quietly built partnerships with police departments, shared footage without clear consent, and created a sprawling, decentralized surveillance network—all while marketing itself as a neighborhood safety tool.Flock is following a similar playbook, just with far more centralized power and far more data. When a private company’s business model depends on expanding surveillance infrastructure and selling access to that data to as many law enforcement agencies as possible, their incentives are not the same as the public’s incentives. Profit motive and civil liberties don’t naturally align, and we shouldn’t pretend they do just because the marketing materials use words like “safety” and “community.”


Why This Isn’t Just About Cars

I’ve written before about how Flock cameras fundamentally differ from something like a traffic light camera, and the differences aren’t small. Let me remind you of a few key facts, Sheriff, that I think undercut the “it’s just cars” framing:

Danger/FeatureFlock Cameras (ALPRs)Traffic Light Cameras
Surveillance ScopeAll vehicles, all times, all locationsOnly violations, specific locations
Data Retention7–30 days default, indefinite for investigationsShort, violation-focused
Data SharingNationwide, multi-agency, private & federal accessLocal, limited, not networked
OversightOften lacking, weak audits, no warrantsRegulated, limited access
Documented MisuseStalking, personal disputes, unauthorized searchesRare
Civil Liberties RisksMass surveillance, chilling effects, hacking riskMinimal, targeted enforcement

Traffic light cameras are triggered by a specific violation, capture a specific moment, and typically purge non-violation data within days. Flock cameras run continuously, retain data indefinitely once flagged, and feed into networks that span thousands of agencies, law enforcement and private entities alike, often without a warrant.There have already been documented cases of officers misusing license-plate-reader systems to track people they personally knew. That’s not a “just cars” problem. That’s a power problem. And power, unchecked, tends to find new and creative ways to be misused.


Documented Cases Where Flock Cameras Were Used to Track People (Not Just Cars)

#Date / LocationWhat HappenedHow the Camera Was UsedSource
1June 2026 – Public Trail (Condor camera demonstration)A reporter filmed a Condor‑mounted Flock camera pivoting, following, and zooming on her as she walked the trail, proving the system can lock onto a person in real time.The camera’s pan‑tilt‑zoom (PTZ) capability was illustrated, showing it can “track” an individual rather than merely read a license plate.
22025 – Milwaukee, WI (Officer Josue Ayala)The officer searched the license‑plate number of his ex‑girlfriend > 200 times over two months, using the Flock interface to locate her movements.The system was employed as a personal “people‑search” tool, not for any traffic violation.
32025 – Covington, GAA detective was fired after an internal‑affairs investigation showed he had used the Flock portal to track a female coworker 41 times between January and July.The officer accessed the real‑time routing feature to monitor the coworker’s vehicle and, by extension, her location.
42024 – Multiple U.S. jurisdictions (404 Media investigation)Police departments entered descriptive searches such as “heavy‑set male with a black‑and‑white hat,” “person on skateboard,” and “person wearing orange vest and construction hat” to find individuals, bypassing the license‑plate‑only design.The ALPR interface was used to locate specific people based on physical characteristics, effectively turning the system into a people‑tracker.
52025 – General findings reported by EngadgetDozens of documented instances were compiled showing officers using Flock to stalk ex‑girlfriends, current partners, and other personal targets.The system’s “real‑time routing” and historical search logs allowed officers to see where a suspect’s car (and thus the person) had been.
62025 – Omaha, NE (court documents)A police officer accessed Flock data to locate an undercover officer’s vehicle after a tip, effectively using the system to pinpoint a person of interest.The camera network supplied the officer’s location by matching the undercover cop’s license plate, but the intent was to identify the person behind the car.
72025 – Oklahoma City (reported by Mother Jones)A police officer used the Flock portal to locate a former romantic partner by repeatedly searching her license‑plate number and reviewing the car’s movement history.The officer’s motive was personal, not law‑enforcement‑related, showing the system’s capacity for non‑criminal people tracking.


What These Cases Reveal

  • People‑centric searches: Officers are entering descriptive, non‑vehicle queries (e.g., “person wearing orange vest”), proving that the system can be used to locate individuals based on appearance, not just a license plate.
  • Real‑time routing feature: The “START REAL‑TIME ROUTING” button (seen in multiple investigations) lets users watch a vehicle’s live path, effectively turning the camera into a live‑tracking tool for the person inside.
  • Personal stalker cases: Several documented incidents involve officers using the system to monitor ex‑girlfriends, coworkers, or acquaintances—clear evidence of misuse beyond legitimate public‑safety purposes.
  • Broad deployment: These examples span multiple states (Wisconsin, Georgia, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and national investigations), indicating that the issue isn’t isolated to a single department.

While Flock cameras are marketed as “license‑plate‑only” tools, the documented cases above demonstrate that law‑enforcement agencies have repeatedly leveraged the technology to track people—often for personal, non‑criminal reasons. This reveals a gap between the company’s public statements and the reality of how the system is being employed on the ground.

Here is where the “white noise”comes from… Why the Confusion Exists

Misinformation online – Reddit threads and social‑media posts sometimes claim “Flock cameras are already tracking Bluetooth/Wi‑Fi,” but experts and the company’s own documentation refute those claims, pointing out that the only Bluetooth present is for maintenance, not data capture.

Third‑party add‑ons – Vendors like Leonardo DRS are actively marketing SignalTrace to police departments that already have ALPRs (including some that use Flock). When a department buys both, it can look like a single “Flock‑plus‑SignalTrace” system, even though the underlying camera itself remains unchanged.

And here are more facts: Multiple independent reports confirm that the Raven audio‑detection module has already been installed and is actively paired with Flock Safety’s Falcon ALPR cameras in several jurisdictions.


SourceWhat it says
Reddit – r/FlockSurveillanceUsers report that “some cities are adding the Raven microphone to their flock cams” and describe it as an upgrade from a pure shot‑detection system to a broader “distress‑sound” detector 
OFFICER MagazineDescribes the Raven as an “audio detection device that detects gunshots, locates the source, and works in tandem with the Flock Safety Falcon™ ALPR camera”
WANE‑15 (Fort Wayne, IN)Announces a pilot where the Raven “integrates directly with Flock Safety’s broader investigative platform … allowing officers to compare audio alerts with license‑plate‑reader information” .
GovTechExplains that “Raven can trigger cameras to begin recording, but it relies on cameras to do the actual processing … Flock Safety plans to rely solely on its AI algorithms to identify a sound” .
City of El Mirany blogNotes that “when gunfire is detected, any existing FLOCK Safety Falcon license‑plate‑recognition camera nearby is automatically activated to capture additional visual evidence”.
Wikipedia (June 2026 entry)Cites a WSLS‑TV report that a “Flock device, identified as a Flock Raven …” was deployed in the field .

These pieces come from different media types (industry magazines, local news, a city‑government blog, a community‑run forum, and a reputable encyclopedia entry) and all converge on the same fact: the Raven audio sensor is being mounted on, and actively used with, existing Flock cameras.


What “active” looks like in practice

  1. Audio‑triggered recording – When the Raven’s AI recognises a qualifying sound (e.g., a gunshot or a scream), it sends an approximate location to the Falcon camera, which then starts recording video of the scene .
  2. Data fusion in FlockOS – The audio alert is logged alongside the license‑plate reads, letting investigators correlate sound events with vehicle movements .
  3. Pilot deployments – Fort Wayne’s police department is testing this integration, and other agencies such as Morgan Hill PD and Albany PD have publicly announced full‑scale use.

Why the evidence matters

Transparency & oversight – Knowing that the audio component is already live underscores the urgency of establishing clear policies (data retention, civilian oversight, audible‑recording consent) before further roll‑outs.

Surveillance scope widens – The original ALPR only captured static vehicle data; Raven adds a real‑time acoustic layer that can pick up events even when no car is present (e.g., a shooting in a park).

Potential for mission creep – Because the audio feeds are automatically linked to video, the system can be used for situational awareness far beyond the original “license‑plate only” premise.

And lets not forget about Flock Alpha…Drones.

Sheriff, I don’t doubt your intentions. I don’t doubt that, under your watch, this technology is being used responsibly. But my objection has never really been about you. It’s about the next person. And the person after that. And whether the guardrails we build now will hold when someone with very different intentions eventually takes the reins.”They only track cars” isn’t a safeguard, it’s a description of current, voluntary restraint. And voluntary restraint is not a substitute for enforceable law. Before we flip on every feature this AI is capable of before the microphones go live, before the data-sharing networks expand further, before we hand this much power to a private company with a profit motive, we need real guardrails in place. Not because I think you’ll misuse this technology, Sheriff. But because I guarantee you, someone eventually will. And by then, it’ll be too late to put the genie back in the bottle.

Have a Good day!

Below is a link to his side of the debate… https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1HHNQu4fVT/

Suggested reading on the subject is Orwell’s 1984, perhaps you heard of it?

If that is not enough, try my latest novel…The Corrected City its a page turner.

Nobody remembers the first camera.
Twenty years after the Year of Fires, the city is safe. Assault is down eighty percent. Nobody has been murdered in eleven years. The screens say good morning by name, the clinics answer in minutes, and the past is kept tidy by people like Mara Venn, who has spent eleven years at the Ministry of Public Memory correcting the record so that no citizen ever has to live inside a contradiction.


Then a corrupted file comes across her desk, and she is very good at her job, and she restores it.
What surfaces is four minutes of footage the official history cannot survive, a wind reading nobody bothered to falsify, twenty-seven names missing from a memorial roll, and a photographer in a government coat who tipped his head to the right exactly the way her sister does.


She can prove it. She cannot prove it to anybody who would still be alive afterward, starting with her sister, who reads the names of the dead on air to four hundred thousand people and believes every word.
A near-future thriller about surveillance that arrives as kindness, history that is corrected rather than censored, and the quiet, decades-long work of putting the truth somewhere it can be found.

They Called Me Dumbass

They Called Me Dumbass

Why You Should Look Up the Words You Don’t Know

For years, I thought my name was Dumbass.True story. I heard it in the classroom, on the playground, and at home, and I never once questioned it. When you’re a small child, you don’t argue with the world. You believe what it tells you about yourself. And what the world told me, over and over, was that I was slow, that I was broken, that I was the kid who just didn’t get it.Imagine your own father handing you a broom and a dustpan and telling you that the world needs ditch diggers and janitors too. “Here,” he says. “See if you can figure this out.” That was the ceiling someone else built for me before I was old enough to know I could reach higher.This was the 1960s. Back then, they didn’t diagnose learning disabilities; they labeled the children who had them, and the labels stuck like tar. There were no specialists pulling you aside, no gentle explanations, no understanding that a mind could simply work differently. There was only a single, brutal word for a kid like me, and everyone seemed to agree on it: stupid.So I wore it. I answered to it. For years, I honestly believed that was who I was.

The People Who Saw Me

I made it a point to befriend the school janitor. Many afternoons, I would walk the halls beside him as he went about his work, and yes, I helped him. His name was Jack, and Jack was a noble man. He didn’t treat me like gum stuck to the bottom of his shoe. He treated me like a person. When you’ve been told you’re nothing, you never forget the ones who decide otherwise.But here’s the thing the adults never understood: the problem was never that I couldn’t learn. The problem was that when I looked at text, the words came apart. The letters jumbled together and refused to make sense. It wasn’t until my second attempt at second grade that things began to become clear. I excelled at math, yet when it came to reading, I had nothing. Nada.Still, that math ability told me something important. I could remember almost everything I heard, and I could work through numbers with ease. So I came to a conclusion of my own, one that no teacher ever handed me: I was not stupid. I was an audible learner. My mind worked. It just worked differently.

The Hallway

That realization didn’t make things easy. I struggled, and the frustration ran deeper than words can capture. My third-grade teacher, worn thin by that frustration, would send me out into the hallway during reading so I wouldn’t distract the rest of the class. She was not kind to me, and I felt every bit of it. A child sitting alone on cold tile while everyone else learns to read: that image has never left me.Then came a small accident that changed my life. I got my hands on an old college textbook, and I noticed that some of the lines were highlighted. When I traced a highlighted line with my finger, something remarkable happened. Voilà, the sentence made sense. Giving my eyes a single direction to follow was all I had ever needed.From there, I caught up with my classmates. I graduated early, without a single special education teacher guiding me. And what happened after graduation is a whole different story. I went to the half-price bookstore, bought textbooks in every subject I had done poorly in, and taught myself every last page.The boy they called Dumbass taught himself.

Why This Matters to You

Words matter. They have the power to shape our perceptions, influence our emotions, and drive our actions. They are the very building blocks of thought, and the right word, expertly placed, is worth a paragraph of explanation.

I know this in my bones, because for years I lived without them, locked out of the one thing that could set me free.So when you skip over a word you don’t know, you aren’t saving time. You are leaving a small door closed. You are choosing not to grow.

Right now, I’m writing a dystopian science fiction novel centered on AI, and I use a great many technical terms in it.

Terms I understand. From fiction to neurology, from medical pathology to engineering, I spent years working as an engineer in the Medical Center. I remember everything I was exposed to there, including autopsies, surgeries, and much more. From music to flying, the vocabulary is real, and it is mine. Every word earned.

So when you’re reading this book on Kindle and you reach a word you don’t know, look it up. If you buy the print version (title to be announced, so follow for updates), you’ll find a glossary waiting in the back. Please use it.

We all have gifts, and we all have deficits. Not everyone shares the same intellect, and that is simply a fact, though it can feel like a hard one. But dehumanizing people because of it is wrong. We are all worthy of dignity, and we would all do well to remember that.

The kid in the hallway grew up. And he still believes in the power of a single, well-understood word. Currently I have close to thirty published novels and have written over 100,000,000 words. Did my third grade teacher telling me that the lights were on and nobody was home, help or hurt? You decide.

Before You Go

If any part of this story spoke to you, don’t let it be the end. Let it be the beginning.

Follow for updates on the book, including the title reveal and release date. Share this post with someone who needs to hear that a different mind is not a broken one. Comment below and tell me: what is a word you looked up recently, or a person like my Jack who refused to give up on you? I read every one.Best.

The Person Across the Aisle Isn’t Your Enemy

The Person Across the Aisle Isn’t Your Enemy

We’ve all felt it. That flash of contempt when someone mentions who they voted for. The eye-roll. The quiet recalculation of a person we thought we knew. In a single moment, a friend, a neighbor, a family member gets sorted into a box marked them. I want to make a case for putting down that reflex, not because it’s polite, but because it’s the truth. The person who votes differently than you is not stupid, not evil, and not beyond understanding. More often than not, they’re something far more relatable: a human being doing their best with the information they’ve been handed.

Garbage In, Garbage Out

Programmers have an old saying: garbage in, garbage out. Feed a system bad data and it will produce bad results, no matter how sophisticated it is. Your mind works the same way. Here’s the uncomfortable part: almost none of us choose our information diet as freely as we think. We inherit it. We drift into it. We follow the sources that feel comfortable, that confirm what we already suspect, that give us the satisfying jolt of being right. If you consume only left-leaning media and dismiss everything else as propaganda, you will build a mental model of the right that is a caricature. If you consume only right-leaning media and wave away the rest as lies, you’ll do the same in reverse. Both people walk away certain, and both are working from incomplete pictures painted by someone else. The tragedy isn’t that we disagree. Healthy societies have always disagreed. The tragedy is that we’ve stopped believing the other side is even reasoning. We’ve concluded they must be broken.

Who Benefits From Your Contempt?

Ask yourself a simple question: who profits when you hate your neighbor? Not you. Not your community. Division is a business model and a political strategy. Outrage drives clicks. Fear drives donations. A frightened, angry, divided public is easy to sell to and easy to steer. There are people (call them puppet masters, call them algorithms, call them incentive structures) for whom your contempt is a resource to be mined. When you dehumanize the other side, you’re not winning. You’re doing the exact job the manipulators need done. You’ve become an unpaid employee of the outrage machine. The moment you realize this, something shifts. That person you were about to write off? They may be a victim of the same manipulation you are. You’re not fighting each other. You’re both being played.

Don’t Feed the Comment Section

Watch the comments under any breaking news clip or live stream and you will see the same pattern: within seconds, before anyone could possibly know what happened, the thread is already a brawl. That is not an accident, and it is not a fair sample of your countrymen. Some of those accounts are bots. Some are paid. Some belong to real people who have learned that cruelty is the fastest way to be seen. All of them are rewarded for it, because the platform measures success in replies, and nothing generates replies like an insult aimed at somebody’s family, faith, or politics. The vitriol is not a flaw in the comment section; it is the product.

So remember what a comment section is not. It is not the public. It is not your neighborhood. It is not a debate. It is a slot machine that pays out in adrenaline, and the house always wins. Do not engage. Do not correct the obvious troll, do not answer the bait, and do not draft the devastating reply you will reread six times before you post it. You will not change that account’s mind, because there may not be a mind behind it, and the algorithm counts your outrage as engagement either way. Close the tab instead. Then go say something generous to an actual person, in a place where your words land on someone who can be reached.

Forgiveness Is Not Agreement

Let me be clear about what I’m not saying. Forgiveness doesn’t mean you abandon your convictions. It doesn’t mean every idea is equally valid or that we should stop debating what’s true and good. Some ideas are better than others, and that matters. What forgiveness does mean is separating the idea from the person. You can think someone is deeply wrong and still treat them as fully human. You can argue passionately and still assume they arrived at their view honestly. You can hold your ground without grinding someone into the dirt. Contempt closes minds, including your own. Curiosity opens them.

A Plan to Reduce the Friction

Good intentions fade fast. So here’s a concrete, doable plan for lowering the temperature in your own corner of the world.

  1. Audit your information diet. For one week, notice where your news comes from. Is it one perspective? Add at least one credible source from the “other side,” not to convert you, but to understand how reasonable people reach different conclusions.
  2. Steel-man before you strike. Before criticizing an opposing view, state it so accurately that someone who holds it would say, “Yes, that’s exactly what I mean.” If you can’t, you don’t understand it well enough to reject it yet.
  3. Ask one more question. When you disagree, resist the counterpunch. Instead ask: “What experience led you to see it that way?” People rarely hold views for no reason. Find the reason and you’ll find the human.
  4. Draw a hard line at dehumanization. Disagree with ideas all day long. But the instant you catch yourself thinking a whole group is stupid, subhuman, or beyond hope: stop. That’s the manipulation working. Name it and reject it.
  5. Never argue in the comment section. Scroll past it. That thread is not a conversation, and half of it may not even be human. If something you read there makes your chest tighten, that is the design working, so close the tab and take the point up with a real person instead.
  6. Protect relationships over arguments. Before a heated conversation, ask yourself: Do I want to be right, or do I want to keep this person in my life? You can often do both, but only if the relationship comes first.
  7. Practice one act of grace a week. Compliment someone you disagree with. Thank a neighbor whose sign you’d never put in your yard. Small acts of goodwill rehumanize faster than any argument.
  8. Model it publicly. Be the person who refuses to pile on. When everyone else is dunking, be the one who says, “I disagree, but I get where you’re coming from.” Grace is contagious. So is cruelty. Choose which one you spread.

The World They Don’t Want You to Build

Imagine a dinner table where people vote differently and still pass the potatoes with a smile. Imagine a comment section where someone changes their mind because they were treated with dignity instead of ridicule. Imagine looking at the person across the aisle and seeing not an enemy, but a fellow traveler who got fed a different set of stories. That world is quieter, kinder, and far harder to manipulate. Which is exactly why it’s worth building. It starts with a single decision, available to you right now: the next person who votes differently, I will treat with respect. Not because they’ve earned it. Because it’s who you’ve decided to be, and because refusing to hate is the most quietly rebellious thing you can do in an age that profits from your rage.

Frozen at Forty-Five

Frozen at Forty-Five

A drunk stranger, a thermos of coffee, and 115 miles an hour: what one second cost me.

My speedometer stopped at forty-five. Frozen there, like a clock that gave up mid-tick. The rest of the world had slowed too: glass tumbling past my face one shard at a time, the dashboard rising to meet me, the steering wheel folding into my chest. People say your life flashes before your eyes. Mine didn’t. Time simply stretched, and in that stretched second I understood I was about to die. I was wrong, but only barely, and only because I like coffee.

You’ve been in that lane. Maybe not drunk, maybe three drinks in and certain you were fine, or looking down at a text for what felt like half a second. Half a second is the whole story. That’s all the time it took to take the rest of my life apart.

That was thirty sevenyears ago. It made the front page of a small East Texas newspaper, and it earned me my fifteen minutes in the most austere way a man can get them.

Driving home tonight, I passed more than one driver weaving across lanes. Usually it’s texting or checking a missed call, and of course they’re convinced they can do it more safely than anyone else. Sometimes the weaving is simpler: they’re drunk or high. I know exactly where that road leads, because in 1992 it led straight into me.

A head-on collision at freeway speeds with an intoxicated eighty-year-old forced me to reinvent myself. I survived treatment at a small country hospital that doubled as an emergency vet clinic (joking . . . I think), and I was clearly destined for other things.

The broken bones and lacerations healed, but the scars remain just beneath the surface. Pain is a constant reminder of that day.

I still have my legs because I like coffee. Minutes before impact, I’d stopped for gas and filled a stainless steel thermos, setting it upright on the passenger seat. Cresting a hill, I found a Cadillac barreling toward me in my lane. My options were to swerve or brake. A red truck blocked the next lane, so in the split second it took to say “Oh, shit,” it was over. That fast. I’d locked the anti-lock brakes and bent the brake pedal. He never touched his.

The combined collision speed was 115 miles an hour. How they calculated that, I have no idea; my speedometer was frozen at forty-five.

That split second is etched into my brain, a permanent reminder of what happens when idiots drink and drive. Time fascinates me now, because I believe it isn’t linear but relative. During impact, the world became a high-speed film: glass tumbling frame by frame, left to right; the dash rising to meet me; the steering wheel crushing my face and chest. What I remember isn’t a bang. It was a long tearing, metal giving up all at once, and then the smell: gasoline, hot coolant, and my own blood. The thermos launched to the floor and wedged between the firewall and my seat frame. Full of liquid, its hydraulic resistance stopped the dash from severing my legs and likely kept the steering column from piercing my heart.

The other driver was pinned under his dash. He left in the first ambulance with a single cut on his forehead and was released that day. He wasn’t even wearing a seatbelt. I never learned what became of him. Since we shared the same insurer, I was “lucky” to be compensated. The claims adjuster was nasty on the phone. They wouldn’t replace my six-month-old truck, and they didn’t care that I was upside down on the loan. I understand adjusters work for the company, but I was surely not in “good hands.” If you’re lucky, insurance is money pissed away on something you’ll never need. Either way, they do whatever they can to avoid paying. Worth knowing: you get two years to file every claim. What surfaced in me after those two years was a diagnosis football players collect from the punishment of the game. I’m certain the insurers know that timeline as well as the doctors do. Two years, then it’s “piss off.” Some injuries take years to declare themselves, growing new bone that either steals your range of motion or hands you pain you never escape, until death.

As I said, my trip to the hospital began only after they’d removed the man responsible.

My vision faded as the pain in my chest intensified. Certain I was going to die, I made my peace with God, and strangely, I didn’t mind. There was a peace in it, as if the answer were finally at hand. God had other plans. Waiting for the end, I managed to unbuckle my seatbelt, but the pain remained.

With what vision I had left, I watched them pull the other driver onto a stretcher. A man came to my window. Talking hurt, and breath was scarce, so my answers were short. My face had met the steering wheel (or the wheel had met my face), so speaking clearly wasn’t an option anyway. Blood was leaving my body through every orifice, visible and not.

The engine and tires of my truck had come to rest beneath my seat. I heard the Jaws of Life popping the metal as they cut the door away, then sliced through what remained of my seatbelt. My vision was nearly gone, but I could still hear the equipment and the voices. People talk about the white light; mine faded from white sparkles to a blank white screen. “It’s a miracle he’s alive,” one responder said. They fitted a collar and pulled me out.

I wanted to say something, anything, to prove I was still a person and not a body they were working on. Nothing came out. My hands wouldn’t close. Somewhere behind the ringing a woman was crying, and I couldn’t tell whether it was for me or for him.

Once they laid me down, my sight returned. I saw the emergency vehicles and the wrecker driver gathering my belongings, scattered across the freeway. Steam rose from under my seat, where the engine now sat. The truck bed was warped and twisted by the force of the crash.

In the ambulance, the medic warned me the 18-gauge needle for the sugar water would hurt. Compared to everything else, it was a mosquito bite.

At the hospital, they were already working on the man who’d hit me, separated from me only by a curtain. He was old, drunk, and on medication. His wife had recently bought him this big old Cadillac after he’d totaled his last car, so he’d be protected if he crashed again. He bragged that she’d been right, since here he was.

Listening to him praise his classic Cadillac, what was left of my blood boiled. Bad enough they’d taken him first; now I had to share a room with him.

Then it was my turn to be treated like meat.

As they cut my clothes off, there was no shortage of spectators: doctors, nurses, a physician assistant (young, attractive, long curly brown hair), and a burly old cop who’d clearly never missed a meal.

The accident report was read aloud to everyone, including the note that my seatbelt was unbuckled. I tried to explain that I’d taken it off, but the cop was more interested in fault and writing a ticket than in me. He looked down as if to say, Sure, we’ve heard that one before. Arrogant son of a bitch. If he couldn’t read the evidence, he was a moron.

Then they cut off my shirt and revealed a wide purple stripe across my chest and belly, the mark of the belt. The cop put his ticket book away. I don’t mean to sound churlish; I count many police as friends. But thinking about him still makes me angry.

The doctor arrived in a black silk sports jacket with a yellow logo, on call from some sporting event and clearly unhappy about it. His bedside manner left much to be desired. There were two hospitals in town, one for the poor and one for people with means. I had insurance and means, and they’d brought me to the one in need of everything.

After examining my naked body in front of the crowd, the “doctor” flipped me over and stuffed a finger up my rear as the last insult. Broken bones, crushed chest, shattered face and legs, and without so much as an X-ray, he finished his exam like I was a slab of meat, scribbled orders, and left. A sonogram showed my heart was bruised. Then came X-ray, near the morgue. I could smell the dead, or maybe that was me.

Water-stained ceiling tiles told the story of the building’s finances. The X-ray machine wouldn’t stay put; its old, loose joints let the head slide every time she stepped back to trigger it. We shot several images before she finished. God knows how much extra radiation that museum piece gave me.

Back in the ER, the man’s wife arrived. “They said I was in the wrong lane,” he told her.

He got three stitches and was soon released. Before leaving, his wife came to me. I was covered head to toe in my own blood, my beard caked with it. She rubbed my forehead and apologized: “I knew better than to get him another car.” Then she added, “I’m not supposed to tell you this, but we have good insurance.”

Even in my state, I was too polite to tell her what she could do with her good insurance. First I had to survive the day, the night, and another day before I could think about any of that.

After hours in the ER, I was moved to the ICU. If you’ve never been hospitalized (and I hadn’t), it’s not an experience I’d recommend.

Because of the bruised heart and they didn’t know what drugs I was on, they decided I couldn’t have pain medication. A dentist checked the teeth that had gone through my face and stitched me up from the inside out, no anesthetic. Next came the doctor who set my broken nose, a man who reminded me of the professor from Back to the Future. He pressed with his thumb, couldn’t get it straight, then jammed enormous forceps up my nose and forced it into place. The pain was unbelievable, ending only with the final crunch of bone.

The monitor echoed the throbbing in my body. As long as it beeped, I knew I was alive.

The PA kept pressing me to admit what I was taking. “C’mon, we know you’re on something. We need to know.” “Really, I don’t do that. Never have.” She tried again and again; my answer never changed. I may be the only person on this planet who’s never touched the stuff, but I haven’t. “If we know what your on we can give you pain meds.” True story, they were bribing me with pain relief.

“We don’t know what you’re on, so we can’t give you pain medicine,” she said. What was I supposed to do, lie so they’d treat my pain? I am not making this shit up, it happened. Whoever this Andy person was, they were protecting him.

After the worst week of my life, the toxicology report came back: low potassium. “What are you doing to make your potassium low?” asked the doctor with the bad bedside manner. “Um . . . I don’t salt my food. I had the flue a few weeks ago…???” I never got so much as an aspirin.

The days and nights blurred. I couldn’t sleep. My nose, packed with cotton, throbbed for days. With broken ribs, even breathing hurt.

Every few hours someone jabbed me repeatedly for blood; whoever they were, they were bad at it. Still on saline, urinating was the only activity I could manage, and lifting the sheet was nearly impossible. More than once I needed help. Humbling doesn’t cover it.

By the third day, glass from the crash was still embedded in my hands, arm, and face. My beard remained a solid chunk of dried blood, and not one person offered to clean me up.They had extracted some of the glass but much like a splinter in your foot, the glass in my body was a constant reminder that I was still alive.

For entertainment, I discovered I could control my heartbeat through biofeedback, slowing it to an eerie crawl or speeding it up. I was wired to telemetry so someone, somewhere, could watch my rhythm; a camera on the ceiling watched too. One night I wanted a nurse and couldn’t get one, so I pulled off the leads. The monitor went silent, and nobody came for nearly fifteen minutes. If this was the ICU, I shuddered to imagine a regular room.

The next day I asked to be transferred to Houston. I knew Dr. DeBakey and many other quality doctors personally; he’d once told me to call, if I ever needed him. If something was wrong with my heart, I wanted him and his team, not these people.

Instead, they moved me to a private room in the hospital’s “best” wing, built with someone’s donation. There, with my family’s help, I got myself into the shower and stayed until every trace of dried blood was gone from my hair and skin. Then I dug my own tweezers out of my luggage and pulled the glass from my body myself.

Before releasing me, the doctor with the crappy attitude was noticeably kinder. Maybe he’d finally accepted I wasn’t on anything, or realized the wreck wasn’t my fault, or maybe he’d just gotten lucky the night before. Either way, I was glad to leave. Holding a pillow to my chest, an old friend drove me home, where I lost months of work, and eventually had to leave the job I loved, no longer able to do it.

I never did get Dr. DeBakey and his team. I’d spent years caring for the physicians of the Texas Medical Center, only to end up in a small East Texas hospital that was a joke by any standard.

Months of lost pay later, I got a call from MADD, Mothers Against Drunk Driving. I could barely afford it, but I sent them money anyway.

Thirty-seven years to date, I’m still teased about my driving. I’m defensive; I leave plenty of room, and I preach to anyone who’ll listen, watch the traffic at least fifteen cars ahead, and leave enough space to see it. People say I drive like a slow grandpa. “Slow” means the speed limit, give or take a mile or two for terrain.

Driving a big truck full of airbags is only part of my strategy. When I see people fiddling with phones behind the wheel, part of me wants to scream. And the cops? They’ve got radios, phones, laptops, and a dozen other distractions, right through school zones. Folks, they’re no different from you. Watch them drift as they mess with their gadgets. I’ve seen it, and I cringe.

Keep your distance: from big trucks, from cheerleader types who think a selfie in a school zone is smart. They do it, and it’s all over Facebook. Just the other day, a young woman picked up her child and tore out of the school at 40-plus in a 20 zone, texting as she passed me. “Where’s a cop when you need one?” I said, and right on cue, a motorcycle officer pulled onto her bumper. She drove a long way, still texting, before she noticed him. That ticket had to be pricey.

I wish I could say this was fiction. It isn’t. It happened. Some memories have surely faded, but most remain, including the pain. For thirty-seven years I’ve lived in unrelenting pain. I take nothing for it. I manage with exercise as best I can, because no medication would leave me mentally sharp. With opioids and such they work, then you need more, and more, and more, and soon enough you have all kinds of other problems like you can’t poop! No thank you. You would be shocked to learn how many people die on the toilet because they have a heart attack trying to poop.

I don’t know what became of the man who hit me. I finally read the police report in 2016 and learned the only charge against him was driving left of center. He and the cop who worked the scene went to the same church.

The cop came in, prayed with Andy, then crossed to my side of the curtain and watched them cut my clothes off. He had his ticket book open when someone told him my seatbelt hadn’t been on. I’d taken it off to see whether that would ease the pain. It didn’t; my sternum was cracked in two.  When he saw the long purple bruise the belt had left, his face turned to disgust. He’d wanted to ticket me, to make me the villain instead of his church buddy Andy. On his way out, he told the attending to test my blood for anything and everything known to man. Some East Texas cops and sheriffs really do suck.

I do know that when you share an insurer, you lose. He’s surely gone by now, but there are plenty to take his place. There were no smartphones then; now everyone has one. Weed is legal in some states, and I fear those drivers will be impaired too. Even where it’s illegal, I’d bet one in three drivers is under some influence.

He got three stitches. I got thirty-seven years of pain, PTSD, and counting.

That’s the part I need you to sit with. The man who hit me felt almost nothing. He went home that afternoon, praised his Cadillac, and let his wife apologize on his behalf. The cost didn’t land on him. It landed on a stranger cresting a hill with a thermos on the seat beside him, and it has stayed with that stranger every day since.

So if you’ve ever done the arithmetic in a parking lot, counting drinks against miles and telling yourself you’re fine, understand what you’re actually wagering. Not your license. Not your record. Someone else’s life, spent on your behalf, without anyone asking them.

My speedometer stopped at forty-five. I’ve spent every year since trying to keep yours from doing the same. Hand someone else your keys. Take the defensive driving course. It’s the cheapest insurance you’ll ever buy

I’ve written a memoir. You can get your copy here. This story is in it in full, along with many others. the cover art is different with more stories than this version but the link will get you there.

Best,

© All Rights Reserved 2026

Back in My Young Man’s Days: Have We Really Learned Anything?

Back in My Young Man’s Days: Have We Really Learned Anything?

There’s an old Max Bygraves song called “Back in My Young Man’s Days” that most of you have probably never heard of. Unless, of course, you happen to be an aficionado of Turner Classic Movies or music from that era. I am both, proudly, and perhaps a little wistfully. As I go about doing the things that men my age tend to do, my mind wanders. It wanders to the news of the day, to memories of the past, and sometimes, more often than I’d like, to the sting of death. And then I put on a song like “Back in My Young Man’s Days,” and I can’t help but ask myself a hard question:Have we learned nothing?

The Same Old Story, Just Louder Now

If the leaders, the megalomaniacs, the dullards, the people who don’t seem to mind putting your life on the line, had to face the same risks as the soldiers who die by the tens of thousands every time someone rattles a saber, one has to wonder how differently the world might look. Then I open up X or scroll through some other social media platform, and what do I see? You’ve seen it too. People behaving badly. Or as one influencer bluntly puts it, “chimping out.”

It makes me wonder: is there something in the water? Something in the food? Some invisible force driving us back to the basic animal instincts of lions and tigers and bears …Go ahead. Say it. Oh my.

Seriously though, if you’ve ever watched one of those nature documentaries where the narrator calmly describes the lions stalking their prey on the savannah, you know exactly what I’m talking about.

The Camera in Every Pocket

Then it dawns on me. Back in my young man’s days, nobody had a video camera in their pocket. Back in my young man’s days, we barely had a Kodak, and heaven forbid, a Polaroid was a luxury. So I have to ask: What if we had? Would we have seen the same carnage back then that we see today? Would Andy Griffith and “Leave It to Beaver” have been the anomaly, or would they have been the standard?

I suspect the truth is uncomfortable.

The Mob Was Always There

Back in my young man’s days, I saw the mob mentality firsthand. I saw boys trying to prove they were men by picking on the timid, the frail, and the girls. Nobody was immune to the red-headed bully who was feeling his oats, or, as I now suspect, feeling his hormones running amok as curly hairs sprouted in places they had never been before.The cruelty was there. The mob was there. We just didn’t have the receipts.

25,000 Mothers a Week

But some things do feel bigger now. Heavier. More absurd. Do you ever think about simpler times? Do you ever wonder how leaders like Putin and Zelensky can be okay with 25,000 young men being killed each week?

Twenty-five thousand.That means 25,000 young mothers each week who have to live with the reality that their baby is never coming home. That’s not a statistic. That’s an ocean of grief we can’t seem to stop refilling.

Food for Thought

Were your parents like the Beav’s?

Mine weren’t. But they were both there, and looking back, that mattered more than I understood at the time. Maybe we didn’t live in a simpler time. Maybe we just lived in a time with fewer cameras, fewer platforms, and fewer megaphones for our worst instincts. But the questions remain the same ones humanity has always wrestled with: Why do we hurt each other? Why do we send our sons to die? And why, with all our progress, do we keep circling back to the same sorrow?Food for thought.


What do you think? Do you find yourself longing for simpler times, or just quieter ones? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Echoes of Tomorrow

Get your copy here…

What the Flock?

What the Flock?


The Big Idea: Flock Safety cameras have become the villain of countless town hall meetings and Reddit threads. But while we argue about license plate readers on lampposts, we voluntarily carry the most sophisticated surveillance apparatus in human history, and feed it our lives, minute by minute. Flock is the magician’s waving hand. The real trick is happening elsewhere.


The Flock Panic

If you’ve driven through an American suburb recently, you’ve probably passed one: a small black camera on a slim pole, quietly logging your license plate, the make and color of your car, and the exact time you passed. These are Flock Safety cameras. Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) that have spread across thousands of U.S. communities, often installed by police departments or even neighborhood associations.And people are furious, understandably so. The concerns are real:

  • Persistent tracking of vehicle movements across networked jurisdictions
  • Data retention for weeks or months, searchable by law enforcement and private industy without warrant.
  • Minimal oversight and murky data-sharing agreements
  • Function creep, where a tool sold for “finding stolen cars” becomes a general dragnet

These are legitimate grievances. But here’s the uncomfortable question:

Why are we so fixated on the camera we can see, when the ones we can’t are infinitely more powerful?


The Sleight of Hand

Flock cameras are visible. They’re physical. You can point at one, photograph it, demand a city council remove it. That tangibility makes them a perfect target for outrage, and a perfect distraction.Consider what a Flock camera actually knows about you:

  • Your car passed a fixed point at a specific time.

Now consider what the smartphone in your pocket knows:

Data SourceWhat It Reveals
GPS / location servicesEvery place you go, how long you stay, patterns over years
AccelerometerHow you walk, drive, sleep—even your gait signature
Microphone permissionsAmbient audio, keywords, environment
App telemetryWho you talk to, what you buy, what you desire at 2 AM
Purchase historyHealth conditions, financial stress, life events
Social graphYour relationships, affiliations, and influences
A Flock camera sees a car. Your phone sees a soul. And unlike the camera on the pole, you paid $1,000 for the privilege of carrying it.


A Brief History of Watching

Surveillance isn’t new. What’s new is its invisibility and predictive power.

  • The Panopticon (1791): Jeremy Bentham designed a prison where a single guard could watch any inmate at any time, but inmates could never tell when. The genius wasn’t constant observation; it was the possibility of it.
  • The Stasi (East Germany): At its peak, one informant for roughly every 6.5 citizens. Labor-intensive, human-driven, and yet still incomplete.
  • CCTV Britain (1990s–2000s): Cameras everywhere, but requiring humans to review footage…analog eyes on analog tape.
  • Today: No guards needed. No informants. No tape to review. Algorithms watch everything, and more importantly, they predict.

The evolution isn’t just more surveillance. It’s a shift from observation to anticipation.


Foucault Saw This Coming

The French philosopher Michel Foucault, in Discipline and Punish (1975), used Bentham’s Panopticon as a metaphor for modern power. His key insight:

When you believe you might be watched at any moment, you begin to watch yourself. You self-censor. You conform. Surveillance becomes internalized until the watcher is no longer needed.

This is the profound difference between Flock and your phone. A Flock camera exerts external control…it catches you after the fact. But algorithmic surveillance achieves the Panopticon’s true goal: it shapes behavior before it happens.You hesitate before searching a controversial term. You think twice before texting a joke. You curate your digital self, knowing it’s all logged. 


The Double-Edged Sword

Here’s the maddening part: the same technology that surveils us is genuinely useful.

  • Your maps app predicts traffic because it’s tracking millions of people, including you.
  • Your health app catches an irregular heartbeat because it monitors your body 24/7.
  • Your assistant answers instantly because it’s learned your habits.

Convenience is the currency we use to purchase our own surveillance.This is what Shoshana Zuboff calls surveillance capitalism: a system where human experience is the raw material, and the product is prediction. Not just predicting what you’ll buy…but nudging what you’ll dothink, and feel. Elections, moods, movements, and markets can be shaped by whoever holds the data.Social engineering at scale no longer requires a Stasi officer. It requires an A/B test.


Winston and Julia, 2026

Recall 1984. Winston Smith and Julia flee to a quiet field in the countryside to escape the telescreens, to find one unwatched moment of intimacy and freedom.Now transplant them to today.They leave their phones behind (good…that defeats the location tracking, the microphones, the app telemetry). They drive to the countryside. But:

  • Their license plates are logged by Flock cameras on the way out of town.
  • Satellites image the open field from orbit.
  • Their absence from the network is itself a data point, an anomaly worth flagging.
  • The purchase of gas, the toll on the highway, the cell tower ping from a phone one of them forgot to fully power down.

The countryside offered Winston a blind spot because Oceania’s surveillance was physical and fixed…telescreens on walls. Today’s surveillance is ambient and predictive. There is no field far enough.But here’s the twist Orwell didn’t fully anticipate: Winston wouldn’t need to be forced. He’d carry the telescreen willingly, in his pocket, and check it 96 times a day. Julia would tag their location in a photo. The Party wouldn’t have to install anything. We volunteer.


So, What the Flock?

Flock cameras deserve scrutiny. Fight them, regulate them, demand transparency. But recognize the disproportion:

Fighting Flock cameras while ignoring your data footprint is like installing a deadbolt on a house with no walls.

The cameras on the poles are the surveillance we’re allowed to see, the acceptable target, the visible outrage, the distraction that lets the real machinery hum along quietly. The genuine architecture of prediction and control isn’t bolted to a lamppost. It’s in the cloud, in the algorithm, in the terms of service you scrolled past.The most effective surveillance state isn’t one that watches you against your will.It’s one you happily fund, feed, and carry everywhere, while pointing angrily at the camera on the corner.


If there is enough interest, I will divulge other ways and places you are “observed.” Or you can just ask Alexa.

On a completely different note, I have released a new book that asks the question, “Are You a Witch?” The link will take you to my author page, where you can browse a multitude of books on a variety of subjects. There is something for almost everyone.Thanks for stopping by, and feel free to comment below.

So the next time you see a Flock camera and feel that flash of indignation, ask yourself: what’s in my pocket, and what does it already know?That’s what the flock we should really be talking about.

BTW does FLOCK mean (For the Love Of Cats?) Probabaly not… More like flock of birds, or cars…or people..

Best

Investing in Our Youth: A Call for Change

Investing in Our Youth: A Call for Change

I have been giving a lot of thought to the recent criminal trials in this country. Consider the Charlie Kirk trial, in which the defendant sits laughing in court with his lawyers, or the case of the child who killed another child at a track meet. Then I see the news, where we are trying to fix the world’s problems, and I note that we have brought in twenty million people from third-world countries who were unvetted. Something needs to be done, but what?


Walk through any high-crime neighborhood and you’ll find the same story repeated. A boy grows up with no father, a stressed or absent mother, a school that’s given up on him, and a street corner that hasn’t. The gang doesn’t recruit him with force. It recruits him with belonging, protection, status, and money — the very things every human being needs and that we failed to give him. Researchers point to the same root causes again and again: poverty, social isolation, discrimination, limited educational opportunity, and low parental monitoring.

These aren’t mysteries. They are the predictable results of communities we chose not to invest in.Here is the hard truth about how we’ve responded: we spend a fortune on the back end — after the damage is done. Locking up a young person can cost well over a hundred thousand dollars a year, often producing worse outcomes than community programs at a fraction of the price. We are paying premium rates for failure. As one blunt observer put it, there is no purely legal solution to gang violence — the only way to end it is to disincentivize the gang money and offer something better.

So let’s offer something better. And let’s pay for it by looking honestly at where our dollars already go.


The argument writes itself. We send billions overseas to prop up other nations’ security and development. Meanwhile, our own veterans sleep in doorways, our own addicts wait six months for a treatment bed, and our own kids are left with idle summers that gangs are happy to fill. As Americans debating this very question.

We keep exporting stability to the world while our own communities burn. It’s time to invest in our people first.


Every year, America sends tens of billions of dollars overseas — to shore up foreign governments, fund distant development projects, and manage crises on other continents. Meanwhile, a fourteen-year-old three miles from my house is being recruited into a gang because it’s the only place offering him belonging, protection, and a paycheck. We have our priorities exactly backward.This isn’t a call to abandon the world. It’s a call to finally do right by our own — the wayward kids drifting toward crime, and the adults our system already lost decades ago. The money exists. It’s just pointed in the wrong direction.

The Failure We’re Paying Premium Prices For

Here’s the uncomfortable math. We spend roughly $80 billion a year incarcerating people, and a single juvenile detention bed can run $100,000 to $200,000 annually — often producing worse outcomes than community programs costing a fraction as much. We are paying luxury prices for failure.And it is failure. Research consistently shows the roots of gang membership are predictable: poverty, social isolation, discrimination, drug use, limited educational opportunities, and low parental monitoring.

And this figure does not include those with LEARING CENTERS scamming those who see a problem and toss tax dollars at it with zero audits or accountability.

We know the warning signs. We watch kids fall through the cracks in slow motion. Then we act shocked and reach for handcuffs.Even ordinary Americans see the connection. As one online commenter bluntly put it, we could fund real solutions “if we didn’t send all of our money to Ukraine and Israel and Palestine” — money that could instead go toward “better funding of education and funding of mental health programs” and “tackling the root cause(s) of why people join gangs in the first place.” 

.

Why Gangs Win — and How We Beat Them

Gangs don’t recruit through force. They recruit by offering what we’ve stopped providing: family, status, protection, and money. The evidence is clear that there is no purely legal solution to gang violence — you can’t arrest your way out of it. As even blunt online debates concede, “the only way to end gang violence is to disincentivize gang money.”

That means offering something better. It works when we try. Structured activities and sports “keep children out of trouble and also give them something to work for,” though they require “extra resources and teachers willing to coach/mentor teams.”

It means encouraging kids to create positive goals — helping them build “realistic and attainable personal, educational, and career goals outside of gang involvement.”

And it starts at home: experts across law enforcement, schools, and community groups agree that educating and equipping parents with real skills “is necessary and critical if the growth of gangs is to be curbed.” 

The framework already exists. Federal research distinguishes between prevention programs that “target youth at risk of gang involvement” and intervention programs that “provide sanctions and services” to pull kids already involved back out. We know what to build. We just refuse to fund it at scale.

The Group Everyone Forgets: The Lost Adults

Here’s what most policy debates skip entirely. The at-risk kid of today is almost always the child of the lost adult of yesterday — the one who never got the mentor, the trade, or the second chance twenty years ago, and who now cycles through prison, addiction, and unemployment. You cannot save the child while ignoring the broken adult raising him. Fix both, or fix neither.So a domestic-first agenda must do two things at once:

  • For the lost adults: fair-chance hiring, trade certification in fields that can’t be outsourced — welding, HVAC, trucking, electrical — and addiction and mental-health treatment available now, not after a six-month waitlist.
  • For the kids: full after-school and summer programming in every high-poverty zip code, family support, and credible-messenger mentors.

And here is the beautiful symmetry: the redeemed adult becomes the mentor for the next kid. The man who did his time, got clean, and rebuilt his life is the single most credible voice a drifting teenager will ever hear. He isn’t a lecture — he’s living proof. Foreign aid builds roads in other countries. This builds people in ours, and each rebuilt person rebuilds the next.

Answering the Critics — and Winning

Defenders of foreign spending will say aid is a small slice of the budget that buys strategic stability. Fine. Then find the money in the other 99 percent — the point stands that prevention at home is starved relative to its proven return. This was never about isolationism. It’s about a simple principle: put our own house in order first, and lead the world by example rather than by check.Public safety and human redemption aren’t opposing goals. Policymakers should prioritize public safety by curbing gang activity and restoring order to communities — for the sake of families “still living in fear” — precisely by investing in the opportunity that makes gangs obsolete.

The Bottom Line

We have the resources. We have the research. We have millions of Americans — kids and adults alike — waiting for someone to bet on them instead of writing them off. Bring the money home. Rebuild the kids. Redeem the lost. And watch the redeemed turn around and save the next generation.That’s not charity. That’s the smartest investment this country could possibly make.

Comment below if you have thoughts on this.

Main Street Didn’t Die of Natural Causes

Main Street Didn’t Die of Natural Causes

When I wanted to use a mom-and-pop shop, I was chastised because they were more expensive than a big box store. The truth is that big box stores, and now companies like Amazon, are putting these folks out of business. When small towns turn into empty buildings and “antique shops,” you have yourself to blame.

The Real Cost of “Saving” Money at Big Box Stores

We’ve all been tempted by the lower price tags at big box retailers. But here’s something worth considering: what are you actually getting for your money?When you walk into a locally owned hardware store, nursery, bike shop, or specialty retailer, you’re not just buying a product. You’re buying decades of accumulated knowledge. That owner has likely used, tested, repaired, and lived with the products on their shelves. They chose each item deliberately because they believe in it.

Expertise You Can’t Put a Price Tag On

Local merchants stake their reputation on every recommendation. They live in your community. They’ll see you at the grocery store. They have every incentive to steer you right.They can troubleshoot problems because they understand how their products actually work in real-world conditions.They’ll talk you out of buying something if it’s not the right fit, something a commission-driven or undertrained big box employee will never do.

The Big Box Reality

Large retailers cycle through employees at staggering turnover rates. Many staff members received a few hours of computer-based training before being placed in departments they know nothing about. They’re reading the same box you’re reading. You’re essentially paying less to help yourself.

The Hidden Costs of Going Cheap

That “savings” evaporates quickly when you

  • buy the wrong product because no one guided you properly,
  • have to make return trips because of bad advice,
  • purchase unnecessary extras you didn’t actually need, or
  • end up replacing a cheap item sooner than expected.

It’s an Investment in Your Community

Every dollar spent locally circulates back through your neighborhood, funding schools, roads, and local services. When a mom-and-pop shop closes, that expertise leaves with it and doesn’t come back.

The few extra dollars you spend at a local shop aren’t a markup. They’re tuition. You’re paying for someone’s lifetime of knowledge, honest guidance, and genuine accountability. That’s a bargain at any price.

put your thoughts and comments below. “Am I right?”

The Social Media Paradox: Election Integrity and the Debate Over the SAVE Act

The Social Media Paradox: Election Integrity and the Debate Over the SAVE Act

The Social Media Paradox: Election Integrity and the Debate Over the SAVE Act

Social media is a double-edged sword. It connects us, informs us, and sometimes frustrates us, especially when we encounter perspectives from people we know that leave us scratching our heads. A recent scroll through my feed sparked a question I find myself revisiting: Is social media ultimately a benefit or a detriment to public discourse?

The Debate Over the SAVE Act

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act has become a flashpoint in ongoing discussions about election security in the United States. The legislation aims to strengthen voter verification requirements, and opinions on it are sharply divided.I recently came across a post from an acquaintance who declared, “If this act disenfranchises one person, I am against it.” While I understand the sentiment of protecting voter access, I couldn’t help but wonder: What about the other side of that equation?

Questions Worth Considering

Those who support stronger election integrity measures often raise concerns such as:

  • Voter roll accuracy: How do we ensure that only eligible (living) citizens participate in elections?
  • Mail-in ballot security: What safeguards exist to prevent potential fraud?
  • Vote counting efficiency: Why do some nations with large populations report results within hours, while some Blue States take weeks?

The Heart of the Matter

Free and fair elections are the foundation of a functioning democratic republic. Balancing voter access with election security remains one of our most important civic challenges.What are your thoughts?

About the Cover: The Ocean Within is a gripping, science-driven thriller that explores the fragile balance between humanity and the forces of nature. Perfect for fans of Michael Crichton, Andy Weir, and Kim Stanley Robinson, this novel will leave you breathless—and questioning how much we really understand about the world beneath our feet.