Category: opinion

Rethinking Blame: Kirk and Carlson’s Conversation Unpacked

Rethinking Blame: Kirk and Carlson’s Conversation Unpacked

The recent interview between Charlie Kirk and Tucker Carlson warrants closer scrutiny, particularly in light of the significant influence both figures wield in shaping public discourse. While the conversation touched on a variety of topics, including generational blame, political strategy, and cultural values, it also revealed certain rhetorical tendencies and ideological positions that merit critical reflection and, perhaps, a reevaluation of their approach.

Generational Blame and Oversimplification

One of the central themes of the interview was the critique of Baby Boomers, with both Kirk and Carlson suggesting that this generation bears significant responsibility for the economic and cultural challenges faced by younger generations, particularly Gen Z. This argument, while provocative, risks oversimplifying complex systemic issues. As noted in the transcript of the interview titled “How Debt Has Radicalized Young America and Why Boomers Deserve the Blame”, Kirk and Carlson discuss how debt and economic inequality have disproportionately impacted younger generations, framing Boomers as a primary cause 

.While it is true that certain policies and decisions made during the Baby Boomer era have contributed to current economic challenges, attributing blame to an entire generation ignores the diversity within that cohort. Many Boomers were not in positions of power and faced their own economic struggles. Furthermore, systemic issues such as rising debt, economic inequality, and environmental degradation are the result of decisions made by individuals across multiple generations, not solely by Boomers. This kind of generational scapegoating risks alienating potential allies and oversimplifying the root causes of these problems.

Inflammatory Rhetoric and Its Consequences

Another point of concern is the tone and language used during the interview. Tucker Carlson, known for his provocative style, reportedly used inflammatory language, including a call to “lock those [expletive] up,” which was met with visible discomfort from Kirk, as noted in the interview. While Carlson’s rhetoric may resonate with certain segments of his audience, it raises questions about the broader implications of such language in public discourse.Inflammatory rhetoric, while effective in capturing attention, can undermine constructive dialogue and alienate individuals who might otherwise engage with the issues being discussed. It also risks reinforcing the very dynamics of power and division that Carlson and Kirk often critique. As public figures with significant platforms, both men have a responsibility to foster thoughtful and inclusive conversations rather than resorting to language that exacerbates polarization.

The Role of Self-Reflection in Public Discourse

Given the influence of both Carlson and Kirk, it is crucial for them to engage in self-reflection and consider the broader impact of their messaging. While their critiques of cultural and political elites often resonate with audiences who feel disillusioned or marginalized, they must also ensure that their arguments are grounded in nuance and avoid perpetuating division. For instance, Carlson’s reflections on religion and values, as highlighted in the interview, offer an opportunity to emphasize unity and shared purpose rather than focusing on blame or conflict.Moreover, Kirk’s role as a voice for younger generations could benefit from a more balanced approach that acknowledges the contributions and struggles of older generations while advocating for systemic change. By fostering intergenerational collaboration and emphasizing shared goals, Kirk and Carlson could help bridge divides rather than deepen them.

The recent interview between Charlie Kirk and Tucker Carlson provides a valuable opportunity to reflect on the role of public figures in shaping societal narratives. While their critiques of generational and systemic issues raise important questions, their reliance on oversimplification and inflammatory rhetoric risks undermining the constructive potential of their platform. A more nuanced and inclusive approach, grounded in self-reflection and a commitment to fostering unity, would better serve their audience and contribute to meaningful progress on the issues they seek to address.

Trump’s Late Night Iran Strategy: A Game of Diplomatic Whack-a-Mole

Trump’s Late Night Iran Strategy: A Game of Diplomatic Whack-a-Mole

As many of you might have heard, the US, under Trump—yes, that Trump—decided to play a little game of geopolitical whack-a-mole and removed three Uranium enrichment sites in Iran on a Saturday night. Because, you know, nothing says “I’m serious about diplomacy” like a late-night raid.
Now, some folks might argue that Iran was just trying to save the planet with their proposed nuclear energy programs. You know, the same way a toddler thinks they’re helping by “cleaning” the house with a garden hose. Most of you reading this would probably just nod and say, “Bless your heart,” while secretly rolling your eyes.


I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: we should pay attention to what people do, not just what they say. Talk is cheap, folks. Take the people crying foul over Trump not consulting Congress or the American people. Seriously? If they were in charge, they’d be the first ones waving a white flag and begging for mercy from anyone who hates this country.


Now, let’s talk about how this mission went off without a hitch—thanks to a little thing called secrecy. It was like a magic trick: “Now you see the B2 bombers heading to Guam, now you don’t!” Not getting permission from those who want to impeach Trump for merely existing? That’s the real sleight of hand.
Today’s media circus will be full of voices, both for and against. The naysayers will crank up the emotional tension, warning us that Iran, the world’s favorite sponsor of terror, is going to do something terrible. Spoiler alert: they always talk a big game, but their actions? Always violent and deadly.


Remember that phrase “speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far”? Good ol’ Teddy Roosevelt popularized it to remind us that diplomacy is great, but a strong military presence is even better. Last night, we saw that principle in action. Appeasers? They’re always going to get screwed by the oppressors. It’s a fact of life, like taxes and bad hair days.


Had Trump notified Congress, those who’ve been bought off by our enemies would have been tipped off. You know, the ones who want him impeached? Yeah, they’re probably on the payroll of foreign governments. Treason is a real thing, and maybe we should consider bringing back public hangings for those convicted of it. Talk about a big stick!


So, these are my thoughts on the stupid shit that is political posturing and theater. Those who talk shit are just pandering to the mindless masses who gobble up whatever the media, bought and paid for by America’s enemies, dishes out. It’s all emotional leverage to manipulate the masses who want to believe in crazy shit—like the tooth fairy, flat Earth theories, and other absurdities that make for entertaining blogs about stupid shit.


Have a nice day!

More Stupid Shit

More Stupid Shit

and media manipulation

Vance Boelter, a man clearly not invited to the “Let’s Make Good Life Choices” seminar, decided one day to spice things up by dressing as a cop, strolling up to a Minnesota lawmaker’s house, and committing straight-up cold-blooded murder. Bold move, Vance. Bold, stupid-as-hell move.

Now, as gruesome and shocking as that is, what really takes the cake here is the way Alexa—yes, Amazon’s Alexa—decided to break the news. Imagine walking into your kitchen, coffee in hand, ready to fight the soul-sucking Monday ahead, when your helpful little robot assistant pops up with:

“A murder occurred at the home of a Democratic Lawmaker. The perpetrator shot the husband and wife in cold blood.”

To be honest, the newsflash should have left out the word Democrat… Whoever writes this shit knows what they are doing and trust me, its deliberate.

Well, damn, Alexa. Way to brighten my day. That’s one hell of a headline to pair with my toast and jam. But you know what they didn’t mention? What they just conveniently left out? That Vance was… wait for it… a Democrat appointee, courtesy of Governor Tim Walz himself. Yeah, let that marinate. Tens of thousands of people see that vague little nugget of information and immediately start imagining some MAGA-hat-wearing lunatic foaming at the mouth. Because that’s what we do now: jump to conclusions faster than a squirrel on espresso.

Public Opinion: A Circus of Stupidity

This, ladies and gentlemen, is how public opinion is formed. Not with facts or nuance or even a shred of common sense. Nope. Just a headline and a whole lot of assumptions. And let’s be real here—critical thinking is about as popular these days as a Nickelback reunion tour. Nobody questions anything, nobody digs deeper. The media throws you a bone, and we all run with it like we’re championship greyhounds.

But wait! There’s more! Because, of course, there’s always more stupid shit to pile on top of the already steaming heap. Enter Alex Padilla, the guy who apparently thought it was a good idea to crash Kristi Noem’s press conference (because why not, right?). This same dude is now trying to tie these murders to Trump’s campaign. Yes, you read that right. The murders. Trump. Connected. Somehow. It’s like a bad game of Mad Libs where every blank gets filled with “Trump” because nobody knows what else to say anymore.

Why Are We Like This?

And here’s the million-dollar question: Why are tensions rising? Why is everybody so angry all the damn time? Well, buckle up, because here’s the answer—it’s stupid shit like this. The media stirs the pot with half-truths, people gobble it up without question, and before you know it, everyone’s picking sides and throwing punches. It’s human nature, sure, but it’s also human stupidity in its purest form.

So, there you have it. Murder, media, and a masterclass in how to divide a population. If this isn’t the poster child for my upcoming book, Stupid Shit, I don’t know what is. Oh, and if you’re still here, sign up for emails so you can snag the book on KDP when it drops because nothing cures the existential dread of living in a divided society like laughing at the sheer absurdity of it all.

Learn to ask questions and stop assuming shit.

-Scott

More Stupid Shit: Dia dos

More Stupid Shit: Dia dos

Ah, lawyers and politicians—the true thespians of our time. If there’s one thing they excel at, it’s political theater. And yesterday, Senator Alex Padilla took center stage for his 15 minutes of fame, delivering a performance that would make even the most melodramatic soap opera actor blush.

Padilla’s stunt at Christy Noem’s press conference wasn’t just about making a scene—it was about standing up for the real victims of society: the criminals burning cars in the streets. You know, the ones who are apparently just misunderstood artists expressing themselves through the medium of arson.

The Burning Car Chronicles

Speaking of burning cars, let’s talk about the absolute masterpiece of media spin happening in Los Angeles right now. During the recent anti-ICE riots, where vehicles were literally on fire and chaos reigned supreme, an ABC7 news anchor decided to channel their inner optimist.

“It’s just a bunch of people having fun watching cars burn,” they said, as if this was some kind of impromptu Burning Man festival instead of, you know, a riot.

Let’s break this down. Cars are on fire. Objects are being thrown. The city looks like the set of a post-apocalyptic movie. And yet, somehow, this is described as “relatively peaceful”. Because nothing says “peaceful” like the smell of burning rubber and the distant sound of someone smashing a window.

Padilla’s Role in the Circus

Enter Alex Padilla, stage left. Fresh off his press conference stunt, he decided to use his newfound spotlight to condemn ICE and, by extension, law enforcement in general. In his statement to the press, he dropped this gem:

“If this is how they treat a senator, how do you think they are treating Hispanics?”

Now, let’s be clear: ICE isn’t exactly winning any popularity contests. But Padilla’s attempt to tie his self-inflicted humiliation to the broader issue of immigration enforcement is nothing short of political theater at its most shameless.

Here’s the thing: Padilla isn’t wrong to criticize ICE. But let’s not pretend his little outburst was some brave act of defiance. This wasn’t about standing up for the oppressed. This was about getting airtime and scoring political points. And in the process, he managed to toss everyday Americans under the bus—again.

The Bigger Picture

This whole debacle is a perfect example of how we the people are manipulated. Politicians like Padilla pull stunts like this, knowing it’ll dominate the news cycle. Meanwhile, the media downplays actual violence and destruction, framing it as “fun” or “relatively peaceful”.

It’s all part of the same game: distract, deflect, and divide. While we’re busy arguing about whether burning cars is a valid form of self-expression, the real issues—like immigration reform, public safety, and economic inequality—get swept under the rug.

Final Thoughts

So, what did we learn from all this? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Because this is politics, and politics is stupid. It’s a never-ending parade of bad actors, bad decisions, and bad takes.

In conclusion: yesterday was yet another day of stupid shit. And if the news out of LA is any indication, tomorrow will be more of the same. Stay tuned.

Oh, and don’t forget to follow me and sign up for emails—because, let’s face it, who doesn’t want more random shit clogging up their inbox? But seriously, I’m on the verge of unleashing my literary masterpiece, Stupid Shit, onto the unsuspecting world, and you’re not going to want to miss it. I’ll probably slap it on KDP (because I’m fancy like that), so all you Kindle-having, book-hoarding legends can read it, laugh your ass off, and then wonder why you willingly spent your time on this nonsense. Spoiler: it’s worth it.

-Scott

Trump Derangement Syndrome

Trump Derangement Syndrome

The news of another attempted assassination attempt on Trump made me nauseous.

The Keyword NEWS is the problem.

The excessive use of hyperbole, propaganda, NLP, and rhetoric to generate clicks and advertising revenue has become overwhelming. This nut job in Florida is just one more brainwashed lunatic that doesn’t understand the media has to sell airtime to advertisers and ratings are part of the formula that allows them to charge so much a second for you to learn about self-storage or the latest drug to combat your poor choices of foods.

Even today, after the attempt, Dana Bash is out there calling JD Vance a racist.

Do they not see, or do they not care?

Money is driving the agenda. What kinds of stories garner the public’s attention and make people click or tune in?

Way back when 30 seconds of airtime during the Super Bowl was a million dollars, that was probably a bargain by today’s standards. Imagine that: 30 seconds of airtime for a product during the Super Bowl was a million dollars and change.

If you remember the talking frogs advertising Bud Wis Er, well that was one of our commercials that my employer at the time created. Those commercials cost big money and were aired several times during the game.

To sell airtime, you needed something that drew lots of attention.

The Super Bowl is only once a year. How do we get higher ratings for the rest of the year? Well, we create a product that drives emotions. Trump Derangement Syndrome is a product. The stronger the emotional impact, the more people will tune in.

Hyperbole incites an emotional reaction.

  • If Trump gets in, the world is going to hell, our democracy is gone, and you will be living on the streets with the migrants.
  • If Harris gets in, the world is going to hell, our democracy is gone, and you will be living on the streets with the migrants.
  • The Sky is falling, how to survive a nuclear war, Climate Change will kill us all.

Emotional response not only invites people to tune in, but it incites the unstable into action.

Not a single word of what was mentioned holds any truth.

The simple fact is we have no idea who is controlling the country right now. It isn’t Biden and certainly not the cackling VP. Who is it? Who is setting policy? Who is keeping the country safe? Are your cats being eaten?

The media is not your friend. They are not telling the truth about anything.

If you could talk to Putin, you would learn a whole different set of facts about why he is doing what he is doing. RFK shined some light on it during his speech. Why is our CIA sponsering regime change when these folks have enough nukes to destroy the world 100 times over? What is the ultimate goal?

Are they really trying to reduce the world’s population by 33%?

Do they really think they can create a one-world government when you have so many diverse opinions, religions, ideologies, government structures, and so on?

What about the oligarchs that are pulling the strings? Sooner or later, one of them will claim God’s status, and then what happens?

If you could speak with the Ukrainians who are not pulling the strings, you would learn a new set of facts.

Someone is getting a hell of a lot of our tax dollars, and lots of human lives are being extinguished to feed the greed of a few.

We are puppets being taken to the cleaners by those who control the narrative. Do we really think the woman who slept her way into politics is the answer?

As far as the debate the other night, that was not a debate; it was an ambush.

Harris had been working with Hollywood’s best method acting coach to learn to put on a show. Knowing Trump and his temper, they ambushed him. All three wanted to get under his skin by attacking what he was proud of. Using opinion to fact-check him live, I noticed they didn’t fact-check Harris once.

  • Everything he says is a lie.
  • People leave your rallies because they are bored.
  • World leaders think you are a joke.
  • The economy was your fault, not ours.
  • We fixed immigration. It was you who destroyed it.

There is so much more I could say. The moderators agreed with these falsehoods. I am not sure I could have stood there and dealt with that abuse. If it were me, I would have flipped them all off and left. When he said it was a waste of time, it was, his.

While I don’t wish this lunatic who waited for a chance to kill Trump any peace whatsoever, I am glad he is alive so they can dissect what set him off. I am sure the MSM will play a massive role in the lies told that he accepted as the gospel. I am sure in his mind, he felt like he was doing the work of God Almighty saving Democracy.

One quick thought: name another president who left office poorer than when they went in. Name one other president who didn’t accept a salary.

We are not casting our votes for an individual; instead, we are casting our votes for a set of principles and policies. Trump’s were and are solid and much better than those of the current administration and the last 3.5 years.

We need to toss the assholes out and start fresh only voting for those who will enact term limits in Congress.

Thoughts?

Retiring is Stupid!

Retiring is Stupid!

Those were the words of one Elon Musk. Were they out of context? I hope so.

Should you retire?
The choice to retire is a personal one that depends on several factors, including financial stability, health, interests, and personal preferences. Here are a few significant points that should be considered.


To attain financial stability, one must possess ample savings, investments, or pension income to sufficiently cover one’s living expenses during retirement.


Now here is the rub: I don’t see Gen Z or even the Millennials preparing for retirement. What I see is them living for today and not planning for tomorrow. It’s almost as if they never heard of Dave Ramsey.



The simple fact is that many could not pull together $500 in case of an emergency. It’s true, and the credit card folks love it. If you save money, you know that .50% is about all you can get unless you adopt some high-yield account of 5.5%


Conversely, if you use a credit card, which many Americans do, the interest rate has reached an all-time high of 28.4% APR. We should ask why the current administration is allowing the fat cat bankers to do this, but we can deduce the reasoning.

This administration creates inflation, forces people to use their savings and borrow money, and allows bankers to raise interest rates to encourage predatory lending. I’m sure it’s all on the up and up.


I was curious about what it would cost to borrow $10,000 and repay the loan by making minimum payments. Are you ready for this?
The total cost of borrowing $10,000 at an APR of 28.4% with minimum payments is infinite.

The minimum payment is assumed to be 2% of the outstanding balance each month, a common minimum payment percentage for credit cards. Suppose the minimum payment is less than the interest accrued in a month. In that case, the balance increases, leading to a situation where the balance never decreases, and the total cost of borrowing becomes infinite.


Since they don’t seem to teach introductory economics or critical thinking skills, what are the chances of retirement? Is that why Elon says Retirement is stupid?


Health and wellness: Reflect on your existing state of health and the potential healthcare needs. The presence of a well-developed plan addressing potential health issues can enhance the comfort of one’s retirement. Until you are 65, health insurance is a budget killer. The sad fact is that many companies will not hire older Americans. By older I mean over 50. Yeah, I know the HR bit about not discriminating, but trust me, they do. Getting a job over 50 is doable, but not for the average Joe.

Your track record must be exceptional and free from the embellishments often found in contemporary resumes.

Playing video games is not a career move, nor would it impress a boss who needs someone with critical thinking skills. Unless you are a developer of such games, turn off the game and get your hands dirty.

It’s not enough to have funds or adequate health to retire. What will you do when the day of the week no longer matters?


All too often the day and time of the week only matter to retired folks when a medical appointment is looming. That’s a sad fact, stay healthy.


Consider your interests and hobbies when contemplating how you would prefer to allocate your time during retirement. Certain individuals may enjoy pursuing hobbies, traveling, or engaging in volunteer work, while others may prioritize spending additional time with family or friends.

The ability to lead a satisfying life post-retirement may be contingent upon preserving social connections and actively participating in social activities.


If one derives pleasure and contentment from their occupation, they may pursue part-time employment or a more flexible role. Consulting is a frequent option until the consultee gets what they need from your head and no longer requires your expertise.


The company typically lacks loyalty towards its employees. A paycheck is owed to you for the job or duration of service completed. That sums it up. It can be pretty difficult to accept when you put forth your utmost effort for the company only to have them opt for a more cost-effective alternative. When setting goals, consider yourself and the needs of your family first.


Ultimately, the decision to retire should be based on a thorough evaluation of your financial, health, and personal circumstances. It’s essential to weigh the pros and cons and make a decision that aligns with your goals and priorities.

With inflation, remember that the million you thought you had in the bank now has substantially less purchasing power than what you think you have. If trends continue, you might be in real trouble.


We should discuss the G-word here: Goals. If you have been successful, you are most certainly familiar with goal setting by now.


It would be best if you were goal-setting now, even forty years away from retirement. We do this for several reasons. One of them is setting an example to our progeny. They are watching. They absorb everything you say and do like sponges.


You don’t want to be the grandparent or parent who writes checks to cover your kids’ or grandkids’ bad decisions, sacrificing everything you worked for to bail them out of their bad choices.


I watch them and talk to them, and I must tell you that very few of them have a grasp on reality. It’s almost as if the video games that steal so much of their waking hours are their reality.


If you want to give them a dose of reality, kill the power so that even the smartphones will not work. That topic deserves a book but unless it was in the form of a video game they would most probably never know of its existence.


Your final goal is to run out of money and life simultaneously. When you slide into the home plate (the grave), have it paid for in advance. Whatever your residual is, is what it is. If you teach your children right, they won’t be counting on your investments for their retirement.

Should you retire?
Stress comes out of your hide. Those gray hairs and wrinkles are badges of honor and a price paid for being the best you could be.


In a future blog, I want to explore the subject of jobs. What should you or your child focus on for a career choice? Is college the only way to go?

Stay tuned, follow and comment.

In case you’re new to this blog…I am a writer.
With several works in process.

My books are here, and your support is always appreciated.

-Best

Are We Just Livestock in a Tax Farm?

Are We Just Livestock in a Tax Farm?

I saw a meme on social media. If I posted this, it might get taken down or have its ranking changed, resulting in fewer views. Why?

They don’t want you to think critically. Just nod and agree with the propaganda and vote as instructed.

I don’t believe in that.

In a world where we pour substantial financial resources into the education of our children, it’s hard not to question the ultimate goal of this investment. Are we truly cultivating a generation of thinkers, innovators, and productive taxpayers, or are we merely raising livestock on a tax farm operated by the government?

The current educational landscape is riddled with contradictions. We’ve adopted a system that teaches to the standardized test, a method designed to fit every child into a neat little box. Yet, the reality is that there is no such thing as a standard child. Each student comes with unique strengths, weaknesses, and perspectives that standardized testing fails to acknowledge. This one-size-fits-all approach not only stifles creativity and individuality but also fosters a culture of conformity that is detrimental to genuine learning.

Among the many skills that our educational system neglects, critical thinking stands out as a glaring omission. In an age where it’s all too easy to share a meme that highlights an issue we’re passionate about, we often fall short when it comes to proposing real solutions. Critical thinking encourages us to analyze, evaluate, and create—skills that are essential for navigating the complexities of modern society. Instead, we find ourselves trapped in a cycle of reactionary thought, where the loudest voices drown out the nuanced discussions we desperately need.

As we look to the future, it’s crucial to recognize that the path we’re on may lead us toward socialism, cloaked in the guise of progressivism. We’re being sold a bill of goods labeled as “the answer,” but what we often receive is a repackaging of failed doctrines that primarily benefit the elites. This system perpetuates the belief that a paycheck is a reward when, in reality, it’s merely a tool for survival in a landscape designed to keep the majority compliant.

We must ask ourselves: Are we content to remain mere livestock grazing in the fields of mediocrity, or will we demand an educational system that nurtures critical thinkers, problem solvers, and independent minds? It’s time to reevaluate our priorities and challenge the status quo. Let’s invest not just in education but in cultivating a society that values creativity, innovation, and the power of independent thought. Only then can we hope to create a future that doesn’t merely churn out taxpayers but empowered individuals ready to take on the world.

The media is owned by the elite, who are also the ranchers that keep the herd inside the fences or put them out for slaughter.

Before you vote, look at the candidates’ policies versus their rhetoric. The rhetoric, videos, and pictures can and usually are deep fakes created by AI. The policies are hard to fake.

I genuinely want my novels to remain fiction, and I don’t want them to become historical documents.

-Best

“If I know you’re guilty, it’s easier for me to get you off!”

“If I know you’re guilty, it’s easier for me to get you off!”

What would you think if your lawyer told you that?

Imagine the sound of those words resonating from the mouth of a renowned attorney.

Many years ago, my father asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I scratched at the few chin hairs from my pre-pubescent face and replied, ‘Lawyer.’

My limited vocabulary at the time didn’t include the word ‘apoplectic.’ Still, it expanded shortly after I thought my dear old dad was having a stroke.

My decision was most probably formed around the show Perry Mason. Growing up with only a few TV channels on a small black-and-white television, I can’t help but think that those shows played a pivotal role in shaping who I am today. That was back when Hollywood cared about what they produced.

According to my father, lawyers were regarded as the worst kinds of humans, seen as parasites in and on society who made their fortune by exploiting subtle nuances in the law.

Driving through Indiana recently, the roads were littered with billboards for slip and fall attorneys, or what I call Ambulance chasers.

Anyway, I dismissed that dream and became an engineer instead.

Once my formal education was over, I left home for the realities of life. My career put me on the path of meeting some of the best and some of the worst characters in positions of power.

Among the recognizable names were Racehorse Hanes, Ross Perot, T Cullen Davis, and other notable figures like Dr. Red Duke and Dr. DeBakey. Although there were hundreds of others, discussing them is beyond the scope of this paper. Many pillars of society have played a significant role in shaping my opinions and providing fodder for my novels.

Being a sycophant was never my style; I preferred forming my opinions. I saw them as equals, just like me, going through the daily ritual of putting on their trousers, one leg at a time.

My mantra was to treat others as I wished to be treated.

Just as I reached the pinnacle of my career and believed I had a deep understanding of people, fate intervened and presented me with an opportunity for further education.

Dad’s wise words might have held some truth after all.

I had a lengthy conversation with a high-power attorney whose office on the 34th floor of downtown Houston offered a panoramic view of the city.

One of the cases he was working on was a murder case, and he admitted that his strategy was to exploit a legal loophole to ensure the defendant’s acquittal. That’s when he uttered the infamous phrase, his voice dripping with sinister confidence.’

“Knowing your guilt makes it more manageable for me to secure your acquittal!”

I know my jaw dropped as this statement didn’t align with my belief that all lawyers were like Perry Mason, the charismatic and formidable courtroom genius. How could I be so oblivious to the fact that it was all about money, fame, and power for those narcissistic, overeducated individuals who resided in their ivory towers?

I should mention that there is a possibility of a few lawyers who do not fit into this category. I came across someone who had a prior negative encounter with the company I worked for and introduced herself with a rather bold and provocative label. Throughout my entire career, we formed a close friendship, and I was the sole individual from that company whom she welcomed into her presence.

I watched the case with interest as OJ did his infamous low-speed chase, and I was fully convinced of his guilt.

“If the glove doesn’t fit, you must acquit.” That phrase is used as NLP. On a daily basis, the media and the elite employ Neuro Linguistic Programming to control and influence the American people. Lawyers skillfully employ it to influence the jury, while marketing professionals expertly utilize it to promote a product. Nowadays, it is predominantly used as clickbait on social media platforms.

A blurry image might appear with the text, but this one thing can save your life if… Your curiosity will cause you to click on the picture, and someone will get money from your click whether you purchase the snake oil, or not.

NLP focuses on comprehending human behavior and effectively influencing individuals to benefit themselves, their company, or their brand.

When leather gets wet, it shrinks – a simple truth that even the most foolish person would grasp. Despite the overwhelming evidence, the dream team skillfully employed NLP to persuade the jury that the blood-soaked glove did not belong to OJ because it appeared too small.

As a side note, those who selected the jury were aware of their predisposition to favor OJ Simpson due to the racial dynamics of the case. After OJ passed away, one of the jurists openly acknowledged the truth.

Today, we are subjected to propaganda from the mainstream media, who are generously compensated to promote a narrative that challenges the authenticity of everything we perceive. Don’t trust your deceiving senses; everything is perfectly alright. To ensure things stay fine, it’s crucial to support Joe Biden by voting for him, widely regarded as the greatest president of all time!

Now, following the debate, numerous Democrats are begrudgingly acknowledging that perhaps Trump’s presidency isn’t a complete threat to democracy. Like rats fleeing a sinking ship, they are beginning to fear for their own reelection as everything about the DC swamp hinges on getting re-elected. Pfft.

The DC swamp is comprised of self-serving lawyers who possess the same lack of ethics as the Dream Team. This understanding leads to the argument that only individuals committed to term limits should be elected to those revered halls.

Laws should be enacted to prohibit former officials from becoming lobbyists after their term ends. Only then can we hope to restore trust in all three branches of our government.

When mercenaries disguise themselves as elected officials, their motives can be traced back to their financial interests, dictating their words and actions.

They will say or do anything to stay in power, including making deals with the devil.

On social media, a meme captures the frustrations experienced by individuals over 65.

Not only is my income taxed, but my spending is also subject to taxation, and even the possessions I buy are further taxed for ownership. How can this be considered fair, given the blatant disparities in power?

The answer is that it is not fair, and you didn’t pay attention to who you were putting in office. It all starts with your local school board and goes up from there.

Most politicians running for office prioritize personal gain over improving people’s lives.

Those who make the statement, “I don’t follow politics,” are the useful idiots who will be exploited by emotional triggers through the use of NLP.

They will agonize over how to stretch their limited budget to provide enough food for their family, reluctantly removing items from their grocery carts. Then, they will listen to fake news, their minds clouded with misinformation, and unjustly point fingers at the wrong person, influenced by the biased narratives of those residing in gated communities.

Dad was on to something. He just didn’t know how right he was.

You win elections by pointing out what is wrong with the world and then making a convincing argument that the other guy is the reason that things are so bad. They call it the misery index, which must be high for their lies to be effective. What do eggs cost today? Did the chickens demand more money per egg?

#termlimits #accountability