Tag: writing

“From 9/11 to Flock Cameras: The Dystopian Novel I Started 15 Years Ago”

“From 9/11 to Flock Cameras: The Dystopian Novel I Started 15 Years Ago”

September 9, 2011, started like any other day. While stuck at a traffic light, I was on the phone with our New York office. Something happened; they put me on hold, and as I drove to the Dallas office, I listened to the world change. We can argue about the rumors that still surround Building 7, but suffice it to say, the world changed.

My normal way of dealing with grief is not to drone on about it with friends or family. My way is to write about it. If you follow me at all, you have no doubt read my blog post about writing letters or emails to people who are, let’s say, less than congenial. I use expletives and what have you to get the anger out of me and into the digital ethos, and of course, as much as I want to, I never send it. Burning bridges and being known as a hothead will get you nowhere.

Fast-forward six weeks after 9/11 and at least 3,000 deaths by “some people who did some things.” Bush and his administration enacted the Patriot Act, which is still alive and well today. The things those people did allowed our government to strip away some of our rights, trading them for safety. “Do you feel safe?”

Fast-forward to the Flock cameras, data centers, Alexa devices, smartphones, and, of course, drones. Do you feel safe?

Those Flock cameras, I learned, have microphones.

So, while spending these summer months of 100-plus-degree days clearing out old computer hardware, I found that file from 2011. I had started a book about a fictional city where a horrible event occurred, and much like the Patriot Act, what we see today closely resembles what I put into my book. Being a fan of Orwell, I wrote a dystopian near-future novel that is all but ready for one last edit.

Stay tuned for more updates and for when the book drops.

I am thinking about putting it on KDP Unlimited for those of you who can read it for free. Follow, hit that like button, and comment below if you have ideas you would like to share.Best,

Here is a link to my current books on Amazon.

What Are the Odds?

What Are the Odds?

A Writer’s Honest Take on Contests, Scams, and Chasing the Dream

What are the odds?As a writer and author, I occasionally post a story from a prompt and feed the machine $5 for a “chance” to win a contest. I also play the lottery from time to time. Not that I have an ice cube’s chance in hell of winning, but I do it when I travel. Long car trips on flat, nothing roads are a great way to ask the proverbial “what if?”

What would I do with X millions if I won? It could happen, right? Fortunately, I know what statistics are, so I don’t get too carried away with the fantasy. The same is true for casting my story onto the Reedsy website. Often, I look at the winning story and ask, how the hell did that one win?! I think I know.

The Predators in My Inbox

Putting my own vanity aside, the same skepticism applies to the predators who comment on my books through email, asking me if I would consider allowing them to be my agent. Truthfully, I could use their pitch about my book as a cover blurb. Of course, AI wrote it, and of course, it’s a scam designed to prey on my ego.

So I ask once again: what are the odds?

I have at least five people with the first name “Lauren” as new followers on my Reedsy story site.

All of the Laurens have different last names, and each of them is tempting my ego to override my God-given good sense. They want me to hand over money so they can “take my writing to the next level.”

The Engagement Game

IMHO, if I really wanted my story to win, I’d get everyone on this blog to go over there and “like” my story. That would tweak the algorithm, and maybe then a judge might actually read it and think, “Wow, that’s pretty good.”

Again IMHO, I seriously doubt someone sits down and reads 300-plus stories, each week and carefully weigh the pros and cons of each before crowning a winner. Much like monetized social media with its clicks, likes, and comments, contest platforms probably use engagement as a tool. (If I’m wrong, feel free to comment.)

So Why Do I Keep Paying the $5?

Ever since I ran across a young woman on YouTube (I think her name was Laura) who was going through school at the time parroting what she learned in vlogs, I wanted her company to succeed. They’re a bona fide business now and offer many services. I write, and I pay the money for feedback from other writers that range from “Wow, that’s a great story!” to “You need to make your character feel more like a living person instead of a zombie.”

A Modest Proposal for Reedsy

I propose the following adjustments to the current contest model:

  1. Introduce Written Feedback for All Entries Provide each contestant, regardless of outcome, with a brief written critique from a qualified reader or editor. Even two to three sentences of constructive commentary would deliver meaningful value.
  2. Adjust the Entry Fee to $10 Increasing the fee from $5 to $10 offsets the cost of providing individualized feedback and positions the contest as a premium, value-added service rather than a low-stakes lottery.
  3. Expand the Prize Pool A larger prize, funded in part by the adjusted fee structure, would attract a greater number of participants and elevate the prestige of the competition.

Anticipated Benefits

  • Increased Participant Retention: Writers will feel they are receiving tangible value for their investment, win or lose.
  • Enhanced Platform Credibility: Offering expert feedback reinforces the platform’s role as a professional development resource, not merely a contest host.
  • Higher Entry Volume: A larger prize purse combined with guaranteed feedback is likely to draw new entrants and reengage lapsed ones.
  • Stronger Competitive Positioning: Few writing contests currently offer feedback as part of the standard entry package. Adopting this model would differentiate the platform in a crowded market.

Feasibility Considerations

Assuming contest judging is conducted by human evaluators rather than automated tools, the additional effort required to generate short-form feedback should be minimal relative to the review process already underway. In practical terms, if judges are already reading entries to determine winners, capturing a few lines of impressions per submission is a modest incremental task with significant participant-facing value.

The proposed changes represent a low-risk, high-reward adjustment to the existing contest structure. By transforming the entry fee into an investment in personal development rather than a speculative gamble, the platform can strengthen participant loyalty, grow contest participation, and reinforce its standing as a trusted partner to the writing community.

A Note to My Fellow Writers

To every writer out there navigating this strange landscape with me, this one’s for you.

If you’re like me, your inbox is probably overflowing with “We love your book!” messages from “xyz Publishers” @gmail.com.

Go ahead, borrow that AI-generated blurb if it flatters you, have a laugh, and move on.

We’ve all seen them. We all know the game.

And if you, like me, still enter contests with your eyes wide open, take heart. The genuine followers you gain along the way, the ones who take the time to read your story and leave a thoughtful comment, are the real prize.

They aren’t trying to scam you. They’re walking the same road you are.There are too many of us to name, but we share something powerful in common: the desire to be the best writers we can be.

We keep showing up. We keep submitting. We keep writing, even when the odds feel long and the noise feels loud.

That shared drive is what makes this community worth being part of.

I’ve shared several tips on this blog to help fellow writers sharpen their craft, and I’ll keep adding more.

If any of this resonates with you, follow along for future posts, drop a comment below and tell me about your own experiences, and let’s keep lifting each other up.We’re in this together.

Have a blessed day!

MY Current Books

Why The Hook?

Why The Hook?

One of the things I notice most often in young or new writers is that they’ll come up with an idea that has real promise, but they never bait the hook. What exactly do I mean by that? They introduce a concept, a character, or a world that could genuinely captivate a reader, yet they fail to give the audience a compelling reason to turn to page two. The idea sits on the page like an empty fishing line dropped into the water, waiting for a bite that will never come.That’s where the literary hook enters the picture.

What Is a Literary Hook?

A literary hook is the opening element of a piece of writing, typically the first sentence, paragraph, or scene, designed to immediately capture the reader’s attention and compel them to keep reading. Think of it as bait on a fishing line: its sole job is to catch the reader before they can drift away to something else.Hooks work by creating one or more of the following effects:

  • Curiosity: a question the reader needs answered
  • Tension: a sense that something is wrong or about to go wrong
  • Emotional resonance: an immediate feeling the reader relates to
  • Disorientation: a strange or surprising image that demands explanation
  • Voice: a narrator so distinctive you have to hear more

Why Hooks Matter (Especially Across Genres)

For a psychological thriller, the hook does double duty. It must unsettle while intriguing. Readers of the genre expect to feel a shiver by the end of page one. For science fiction, the hook often carries the added burden of world building. You need to introduce something strange without confusing your reader out of the story.And for satire? The hook needs to make readers laugh or nod knowingly before they’ve finished their coffee.

Types of Literary Hooks with Examples

1. The Startling StatementA bold claim that stops the reader cold.

“It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.” (George Orwell, 1984)

That extra hour on the clock signals immediately that this world is not ours. It’s a perfect example for science fiction writers.2. The Provocative QuestionPoses a puzzle the reader must resolve.

“Where’s Papa going with that ax?” (E. B. White, Charlotte’s Web)

Nine words, and you cannot stop reading. This technique translates beautifully to thrillers.3. The Character in CrisisDrops readers into the middle of trouble.

“The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed.” (Stephen King, The Dark Tower)

Instant conflict, instant momentum.4. The Confession or Intimate VoiceCreates immediate intimacy with the narrator.

“I am an invisible man.” (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)

A first-person hook that promises psychological depth. It’s ideal inspiration for thriller writers.5. The Setting as MoodEstablishes atmosphere so strongly it becomes a character.

“124 was spiteful. Full of a baby’s venom.” (Toni Morrison, Beloved)

A house is spiteful? A baby has venom? You need answers.6. The Philosophical OpenerA universal truth, or a subversion of one, that makes readers think.

“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.” (Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice)

A well-crafted philosophical hook can carry irony and edge. George Carlin himself opened many bits with a mock-serious “truism” before dismantling it entirely.7. The In Medias ResBeginning in the middle of the action.

“They shoot the white girl first.” (Toni Morrison, Paradise)

Six words. Full stop. You’re already committed.

Crafting Your Own Hook: A Quick Checklist

When writing your opening line, ask yourself these questions:

  • Does it raise a question the reader must answer?
  • Does it establish voice, tone, or genre expectations?
  • Is every word doing work? (Cut anything that isn’t.)
  • Would you keep reading?

Every promising idea deserves a properly baited hook. Don’t let your best concept sit unread because the opening failed to invite anyone in. Give your reader a reason, right there in that first line, to commit to the journey you’ve built for them.As Carlin might put it: don’t just start your story. Ambush your reader.

In my book “Are You a Witch?” the hook is in the title. And also the first line on the first page… The last person brave enough to sit beside Sarah Beaumont on the bus was in third grade, right before Maisie Fontenot’s friendship bracelet turned black and crumbled to ash in her hand.

What Doesn’t Trend 

What Doesn’t Trend 

4:51 a.m.

The Butterfly effect in real life…


Maya scrolled through her feed at 4:51 a.m., unable to sleep. The blue light painted her face as video after video played automatically, each one louder than the last.A woman screaming at a barista over a mislabeled cup. 2.3 million views.A man filming himself berating an elderly cashier for moving too slowly. Trending.Two teenagers laughing as they knocked groceries out of a stranger’s hands. Shared 400,000 times.The comments section was a colosseum. People cheering. People imitating. People filming their own versions, hungrier and crueler, each one trying to outdo the last. A girl in Ohio recreated the grocery prank. A boy in Manchester filmed himself yelling at a waiter. In Seoul, a man livestreamed himself humiliating a delivery driver.One wingbeat. Then a thousand. Then a hurricane.Maya set her phone down. Her chest felt hollow, like she’d been breathing in smoke all night without realizing it.


The next morning, she walked into the corner café near her apartment. The barista, a young woman with tired eyes and a name tag that read Priya, braced herself when Maya approached the counter, shoulders drawn up like she was expecting a blow.Maya noticed.”Your earrings are beautiful,” Maya said quietly. “And thank you. For being here this early. I don’t know how you do it.”Priya blinked. Her shoulders lowered by a fraction of an inch, but it was a fraction that mattered.”That’s . . . that’s really kind of you to say.”Maya paid for her coffee. Then she paused. “And whoever’s next in line, I’ve got theirs too.”


Behind Maya stood a man named David, who hadn’t slept in three days. His mother was in the hospital. He’d been running on fumes and bitter thoughts, and he’d been rehearsing, all morning, the sharp things he wanted to say to the world.When Priya told him his coffee was already paid for, something in his chest cracked open. Not broken, but opened. Like a window in a stuffy room.He tipped twenty dollars he couldn’t really afford. Priya cried a little in the back room during her break.David drove to the hospital. In the elevator, he held the door for a nurse carrying too many files. She smiled at him, a real smile, and later that day, she was gentler with a patient who had been difficult all week. That patient, feeling seen for the first time in days, called his estranged daughter that evening.They talked for two hours.


None of this trended. None of this was filmed. There was no hashtag for the daughter who heard her father say I’m sorry for the first time in her life. No viral clip of Priya humming while she wiped down the counter. No algorithm boosted the moment David sat beside his mother’s bed and whispered, “Someone was kind to me today, Mom. A stranger. Can you believe that?”The butterfly’s wings beat silently.But they beat.


Somewhere, a storm of cruelty was building: loud, fast, addictive, easy. It would rage across screens and inboxes and comment sections. It would feel, to anyone watching, like the whole world.And somewhere else, quieter, slower, harder to see, another current was moving. A woman complimenting a stranger’s earrings at dawn. A tip left in a jar. A door held open. A father saying I’m sorry. A daughter saying I forgive you.Both were spreading. Both were real.The only question, the only question that has ever mattered, is which set of wings you will be.


The world you scroll through tomorrow is being built by what you do in the next five minutes.Choose your wings carefully. They’re bigger than you think. 🦋

Have a Wonderful Monday!

And here is the shameless plug for a book with a twist, a vampire and magic...

“The painting hung like a secret in the museum’s quiet corridors. It wasn’t supposed to matter. Until it did.”

Peter Thomas didn’t sign up for this. A young art student working nights as a museum guard, he only wanted to get closer to the masterpieces he loved. But when he stumbles upon a haunting portrait of a woman trapped in a gilded frame, his life begins to unravel. The painting isn’t just art—it’s alive. And it’s hungry. As Peter is drawn deeper into the museum’s shadowy mysteries, he uncovers the story of Vanessa, the king’s daughter cursed to an eternity behind the canvas, and the vampire who’s spent centuries trying to save her. But breaking the spell comes with a cost: someone has to take her place. And under the glow of a blood moon on Halloween night, Peter realizes that someone might be him. Trapped between a love story centuries in the making and the monstrous truth of Vanessa’s curse, Peter must choose: his life, or hers. Perfect for fans of Crimson Peak, The Picture of Dorian Gray, and gothic tales of love, sacrifice, and haunting beauty, The Girl in the Gilded Frame will pull you into a story you’ll never forget. How far would you go to save someone who’s already stolen your heart?

Fireflies and Front Porches

Fireflies and Front Porches

Old Tom eased himself down onto the weathered porch swing, the same one his grandmother used to sit on back when the world was smaller and Sundays lasted forever. The chains creaked out that familiar song, the one that had rocked him to sleep more times than he could count. He set his coffee down on the arm of the swing, just the way Granny used to, and let his eyes drift out over the yard.

Lord, how that yard used to sing.

He could still see himself, no bigger than a bushel basket, running barefoot through Granny’s sprinkler on a July afternoon so hot the crickets forgot to sing. His cousins would be hollerin’, and Granny would be shellin’ peas on this very porch, laughing that laugh of hers that sounded like wind chimes in a summer storm. There was a tire swing hangin’ from the old oak back then, the one Papaw hung the summer before he passed, and Tom reckoned he’d spent half his childhood spinnin’ round on that thing till the whole world went dizzy.

And then there was Ginger.

Ginger Mae Halloway, with her freckles like somebody’d taken a pepper shaker to her cheeks, and hair the color of a copper penny left out in the sun. She lived three houses down, and from the time they were both knee-high to a grasshopper, wherever you found one, the other wasn’t far behind. He remembered the first time he ever thought maybe girls weren’t so bad after all. It was a June evening, the kind where the sky turns purple like a bruise, and the fireflies came out by the thousands down in the woods behind Granny’s place.

“Catch me one, Tommy!” she’d hollered, and off they went, tearin’ through the honeysuckle and the tall grass, cupping those little glowin’ bugs in their hands like they were catchin’ stars. He caught her hand instead of a firefly that night, and she didn’t pull away. He was nine years old, and he knew, knew the way a boy knows things before he has words for ’em, that Ginger was his girl.

They grew up tangled together like the wild roses on Granny’s fence. Homework at her kitchen table. Church on Sundays, sittin’ three pews apart tryin’ not to giggle. High school dances where he stepped on her toes and she pretended not to notice. By the time they were eighteen, everybody in town just figured, well, that’s Tom and Ginger. Been Tom and Ginger since they were shorter than the corn.

He gave her his grandmother’s ring on the porch, right where he sat now, the fireflies just startin’ to blink awake in the woods. She cried. He cried. Granny cried loudest of all.

Then life happened, the way life does.

There was a job in the city, a good one, they said. Just for a few years, he told Ginger. Just till we get on our feet. She smiled that copper-penny smile and packed his lunches and kissed him goodbye at 5:30 every mornin’. The apartment was small, and the city was loud, and there were no fireflies, just streetlights that hummed and never blinked.

The job turned into a career. The career turned into a title. The title turned into a corner office with a view of somebody else’s corner office. And every year, Tom would say, Just till the next promotion, honey. Then things’ll slow down.But things never slow down.

Not for a man chasin’ something he can’t quite name.Ginger became what folks call a work widow, sittin’ at supper tables set for two with only one plate touched. She’d call him at the office and get his secretary. She’d wait up till 10, then 11, then she’d stop waitin’ up. She never complained. That was Ginger. She’d just say, I’ll be here, Tommy. You do what you gotta do.

The promotion came. And with it, more hours. More trips. More dinners with clients whose names he couldn’t remember the next morning. His boss clapped him on the back and called him a rising star. His secretary sent flowers to Ginger on their anniversary because Tom forgot. Again.

He didn’t make it home when Granny passed. Big meeting in Chicago. He sent lilies.

And now here he was, all these years later, back on that porch. The swing still creaked. The oak still stood, though the tire was long gone. The woods still whispered at the edge of the yard.

And Ginger, Lord bless her, Ginger was inside, humming to herself while she washed the supper dishes, her copper hair gone silver now, but that smile still the same when he’d walked through the door last week and said, Honey, I retired. I’m home. I’m really home this time.

The first firefly of the evening blinked on down by the tree line. Then another. Then a hundred more, till the whole woods lit up like Christmas.

The screen door creaked open behind him. “Tommy?” she said. “You comin’ in?”

He reached back and caught her hand, just like he did when he was nine.”In a minute, Ginger Mae,” he said, his voice soft as porch light. “Come sit with me a spell. The fireflies are out.”


The Moral

A man can spend his whole life chasin’ after somethin’: a bigger paycheck, a fancier title, a pat on the back from a boss who’ll forget his name the day he retires. He can trade his mornings and his evenings and his Sundays for a corner office and call it success.

But at the end of it all, when the swing stops creakin’ and the porch light goes dim, ain’t nobody ever laid on their deathbed wishin’ they’d spent one more hour at the office.

The job will replace you before your desk is cold. The money spends and it’s gone. The accolades fade quicker than perfume on a Sunday dress.

But the girl with the copper hair? The porch swing? The fireflies in the woods?

Those are the things worth keepin’ your eyes on. Because those are the things that keep their eyes on you.

***

I hope you all have a wonderful weekend. If you have fireflies where you are…Well…you know what to do. =Scott

The Weaponization of Everything: Why I Never Let My Characters Trust the Government with Alien Tech

The Weaponization of Everything: Why I Never Let My Characters Trust the Government with Alien Tech

The Weaponization of Everything: Why I Never Let My Characters Trust the Government with Alien Tech

As a science fiction writer, I’ve built entire worlds around a single, unshakable rule: my characters never (and I mean never) turn over alien technology to the government. Not once. Not ever. And people ask me why. The answer is simple, and it’s rooted in something I’ve observed about the animal called man.Here’s what I know. The moment some newfangled thing shows up in human hands, one of the very first questions that pops into our lizard brains is, “How could I use this as a weapon?”Don’t believe me? Let me offer you a small, seemingly innocent example.

From Toy to Threat: The Drone Story

Remember that cute little toy the kids fly around the house or the back yard? The quadcopter drone. Charming, right? Now look at modern warfare. Look at the skies over conflict zones. That “toy” has become one of the most transformative weapons of the twenty-first century. And that’s just one example out of a thousand that illustrates how “we,” humanity, think.Give us a hammer, we build a house. Give us the same hammer five minutes later, we’re figuring out how it fits in a fist.

Every Technology Becomes a Weapon Eventually

Look around your living room. This computer I’m writing on? Weaponizable. Your television? A vehicle for propaganda, misinformation, and behavioral conditioning. And let’s roll the clock back to the 1940s, to the radio, that warm wooden box that brought families together in the evenings.Does the name Goebbels ring any bells?Joseph Goebbels understood something chilling: whoever controls the medium controls the message, and whoever controls the message controls the minds.

The Nazi propaganda machine turned the humble radio into one of the most devastating psychological weapons in human history.And let’s not forget the newspaper. Ink and paper. Why do you suppose that when a country is invaded, one of the very first things a conquering entity does is seize the media? Radio stations. Newspapers. Television networks. Because they know exactly what I know: information is the ultimate weapon.

The Modern Surveillance State: Sold Out to the Highest Bidder

Now fast-forward to today. We have “smart” devices in our homes that most probably spy on us, listening, watching, cataloging. We have media outlets lying to us with straight faces. We have corporations installing cameras on every corner “for our safety.”

Since 9/11, we’ve been sold out to the highest bidder. Fear became a currency, and freedom became the transaction fee.

The Porn Scanners and “Safe Radiation”

Remember those full-body scanners the TSA rolled out at airports? The ones lovingly nicknamed “porn scanners” because they essentially produced nude images of every traveler? We were told the radiation was “safe.”

I went after a reporter who parroted that line on national television. Because here’s the truth: there is no such thing as “safe radiation.” There are only levels. It’s like a tiger in a cage. If the cage is solid steel, sure, you can get pretty close and admire the stripes. If the cage is a little dodgy? Well … good luck, friend.

How much money did the manufacturers of those scanners make off our tax dollars while claiming to “keep us safe”? And did you know many TSA workers who operated those machines developed strange and rare cancers? That’s not conspiracy; that’s public record for anyone willing to look.

The Next Frontier: Your Thoughts

We need to tap the brakes. Hard. Because if history is any teacher, and it is, some company, somewhere, is already working on a way to monitor your thoughts. Neural interfaces. Brain-computer links. “For your convenience,” of course. “For your health.” “For your safety.”And once that door opens, it doesn’t close. There’s no putting that toothpaste back in the tube.

Elections Have Consequences

Here’s the kicker: elections have consequences. And when the electorate is a product of an education system that hasn’t taught them a damn thing about history, critical thinking, or how power actually operates, you end up with radical numbskulls getting elected to positions where they hold the keys to every one of these weaponized technologies.An uninformed voter isn’t just a bad citizen; they’re a national security risk. They’ll hand over their privacy, their liberty, and eventually their thoughts, all in exchange for the illusion of safety and the comfort of a curated feed.

Film at 11

So yeah, in my novels, when the alien tech falls from the sky, my characters bury it, burn it, or blast it into the sun before they let a single government agency get its fingerprints on it. Because I know exactly what would happen next.We would weaponize it.We always do.Stay skeptical. Stay curious. And for God’s sake, stay awake.Film at 11.

And now a shameless plug for one of my novels:

Back in My Young Man’s Days: Have We Really Learned Anything?

Back in My Young Man’s Days: Have We Really Learned Anything?

There’s an old Max Bygraves song called “Back in My Young Man’s Days” that most of you have probably never heard of. Unless, of course, you happen to be an aficionado of Turner Classic Movies or music from that era. I am both, proudly, and perhaps a little wistfully. As I go about doing the things that men my age tend to do, my mind wanders. It wanders to the news of the day, to memories of the past, and sometimes, more often than I’d like, to the sting of death. And then I put on a song like “Back in My Young Man’s Days,” and I can’t help but ask myself a hard question:Have we learned nothing?

The Same Old Story, Just Louder Now

If the leaders, the megalomaniacs, the dullards, the people who don’t seem to mind putting your life on the line, had to face the same risks as the soldiers who die by the tens of thousands every time someone rattles a saber, one has to wonder how differently the world might look. Then I open up X or scroll through some other social media platform, and what do I see? You’ve seen it too. People behaving badly. Or as one influencer bluntly puts it, “chimping out.”

It makes me wonder: is there something in the water? Something in the food? Some invisible force driving us back to the basic animal instincts of lions and tigers and bears …Go ahead. Say it. Oh my.

Seriously though, if you’ve ever watched one of those nature documentaries where the narrator calmly describes the lions stalking their prey on the savannah, you know exactly what I’m talking about.

The Camera in Every Pocket

Then it dawns on me. Back in my young man’s days, nobody had a video camera in their pocket. Back in my young man’s days, we barely had a Kodak, and heaven forbid, a Polaroid was a luxury. So I have to ask: What if we had? Would we have seen the same carnage back then that we see today? Would Andy Griffith and “Leave It to Beaver” have been the anomaly, or would they have been the standard?

I suspect the truth is uncomfortable.

The Mob Was Always There

Back in my young man’s days, I saw the mob mentality firsthand. I saw boys trying to prove they were men by picking on the timid, the frail, and the girls. Nobody was immune to the red-headed bully who was feeling his oats, or, as I now suspect, feeling his hormones running amok as curly hairs sprouted in places they had never been before.The cruelty was there. The mob was there. We just didn’t have the receipts.

25,000 Mothers a Week

But some things do feel bigger now. Heavier. More absurd. Do you ever think about simpler times? Do you ever wonder how leaders like Putin and Zelensky can be okay with 25,000 young men being killed each week?

Twenty-five thousand.That means 25,000 young mothers each week who have to live with the reality that their baby is never coming home. That’s not a statistic. That’s an ocean of grief we can’t seem to stop refilling.

Food for Thought

Were your parents like the Beav’s?

Mine weren’t. But they were both there, and looking back, that mattered more than I understood at the time. Maybe we didn’t live in a simpler time. Maybe we just lived in a time with fewer cameras, fewer platforms, and fewer megaphones for our worst instincts. But the questions remain the same ones humanity has always wrestled with: Why do we hurt each other? Why do we send our sons to die? And why, with all our progress, do we keep circling back to the same sorrow?Food for thought.


What do you think? Do you find yourself longing for simpler times, or just quieter ones? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Echoes of Tomorrow

Get your copy here…

Nothing But Time: A Story About What We Lose When We’re Too Busy to Notice

Nothing But Time: A Story About What We Lose When We’re Too Busy to Notice

There’s a particular kind of silence that fills a downtown apartment at 3 PM on a Tuesday. It’s not the peaceful quiet of a weekend morning or the contemplative hush of a late evening. It’s the silence of a man who suddenly has nowhere to be, and worse, no one waiting for him to arrive.This is where we meet Jack.

The Weight of an Empty Calendar

For forty-three years, Jack’s identity was stitched into the fabric of a company logo. He knew the precise angle of morning light through his corner office window. He could recite quarterly projections in his sleep. His fingers knew the keyboard shortcuts of Excel the way a pianist knows Chopin.Then came the merger.They called it “restructuring.” They handed him a plaque, a modest severance, and a handshake from someone half his age who couldn’t quite meet his eyes. Just like that, the man who built departments, mentored executives, and sacrificed weekends for deadlines became… what, exactly?In “Nothing But Time,“ I wanted to explore what happens to a man when the thing he traded his life for suddenly decides it doesn’t need him anymore.

The Ghosts That Live in Silence

Jack sits in his sleek, expensive apartment—the one he bought because it was close to the office, not because it felt like home—and the memories arrive uninvited.His wife, Diane. The way she used to leave dinner in the oven, then eventually stopped. The way she’d ask him to come to bed, then eventually stopped asking. The night she said, “You’re already gone, Jack. I’m just making it official.”His son’s baseball games he missed for board meetings. His daughter’s wedding, where he gave a toast about “investments and returns” because he didn’t know her well enough to say anything personal. The grandchildren whose names he sometimes has to pause to remember.He built a monument to his career.He built it out of the people who loved him.

The Letter That Changes Everything

And then, one gray morning, an envelope arrives. Heavy paper. A law firm’s embossed seal. An roomate from college left him a farm, acres of rolling green somewhere far from spreadsheets and quarterly reports.What does a man who has spent his life optimizing efficiency do with soil, sky, and silence?That’s the question at the heart of “Nothing But Time.”

Why I Wrote This Book

I didn’t write this novel to entertain you, though I hope it does. I wrote it because I’ve watched too many good men and women trade the irreplaceable for the replaceable.Here’s the truth nobody puts in a corporate handbook:

The company will replace you before your desk is cold. But your daughter will remember the recital you missed for the rest of her life. Your son will remember whether you showed up. Your spouse will remember whether you were present or just physically in the room.We chase the watch. The title. The bonus. The corner office. We tell ourselves we’re doing it for the people we love, while the very act of chasing it takes us further from them.And then one day, the chase ends. The company merges. The title evaporates. The watch stops mattering.And what’s left?For Jack, what’s left is a farm and forty years of regret. What’s left is the possibility—maybe, just maybe—of learning a different way to measure a life.

From a large city to a small town Jack Harper gave everything to his career.

Now he’s retired, redundant, and utterly lost.

Then he inherits a farmhouse from the friend who tried to warn him, the friend who escaped to Vermont and died alone, the friend who left behind one final message: Tend the roses. Stop and smell them. Live.

But something strange is happening at the farmhouse. The old radio plays broadcasts from 1943. The rose garden blooms when Jack kneels in the dirt. And Ed, his dead friend, keeps appearing at the edge of the orchard, smiling, beckoning, waiting for Jack to understand what he spent a lifetime refusing to see. Some second chances come with instructions. Some come with ghosts.

An Invitation

If you’ve ever wondered whether you’re building the right kind of legacy… if you’ve ever looked up from your desk and realized the seasons changed without you… if you’ve ever felt the quiet fear that the people you love are becoming strangers… then Jack’s story is your story too.“Nothing But Time” is available now. It’s a novel about loss, yes, but more importantly, it’s a novel about what we can still choose while we still have breath.Because here’s the thing about time: we all think we have more of it than we do. Until one day, we’re sitting in a quiet apartment, holding a letter, realizing that time is the only thing we ever really had.And the only question that matters is:Who did we spend it with?


Don’t chase the watch. Chase the people. They’re the only thing that ticks back.Get your copy of “Nothing But Time” today—and maybe, tonight, call the person you’ve been meaning to call.

What the Flock?

What the Flock?


The Big Idea: Flock Safety cameras have become the villain of countless town hall meetings and Reddit threads. But while we argue about license plate readers on lampposts, we voluntarily carry the most sophisticated surveillance apparatus in human history, and feed it our lives, minute by minute. Flock is the magician’s waving hand. The real trick is happening elsewhere.


The Flock Panic

If you’ve driven through an American suburb recently, you’ve probably passed one: a small black camera on a slim pole, quietly logging your license plate, the make and color of your car, and the exact time you passed. These are Flock Safety cameras. Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) that have spread across thousands of U.S. communities, often installed by police departments or even neighborhood associations.And people are furious, understandably so. The concerns are real:

  • Persistent tracking of vehicle movements across networked jurisdictions
  • Data retention for weeks or months, searchable by law enforcement and private industy without warrant.
  • Minimal oversight and murky data-sharing agreements
  • Function creep, where a tool sold for “finding stolen cars” becomes a general dragnet

These are legitimate grievances. But here’s the uncomfortable question:

Why are we so fixated on the camera we can see, when the ones we can’t are infinitely more powerful?


The Sleight of Hand

Flock cameras are visible. They’re physical. You can point at one, photograph it, demand a city council remove it. That tangibility makes them a perfect target for outrage, and a perfect distraction.Consider what a Flock camera actually knows about you:

  • Your car passed a fixed point at a specific time.

Now consider what the smartphone in your pocket knows:

Data SourceWhat It Reveals
GPS / location servicesEvery place you go, how long you stay, patterns over years
AccelerometerHow you walk, drive, sleep—even your gait signature
Microphone permissionsAmbient audio, keywords, environment
App telemetryWho you talk to, what you buy, what you desire at 2 AM
Purchase historyHealth conditions, financial stress, life events
Social graphYour relationships, affiliations, and influences
A Flock camera sees a car. Your phone sees a soul. And unlike the camera on the pole, you paid $1,000 for the privilege of carrying it.


A Brief History of Watching

Surveillance isn’t new. What’s new is its invisibility and predictive power.

  • The Panopticon (1791): Jeremy Bentham designed a prison where a single guard could watch any inmate at any time, but inmates could never tell when. The genius wasn’t constant observation; it was the possibility of it.
  • The Stasi (East Germany): At its peak, one informant for roughly every 6.5 citizens. Labor-intensive, human-driven, and yet still incomplete.
  • CCTV Britain (1990s–2000s): Cameras everywhere, but requiring humans to review footage…analog eyes on analog tape.
  • Today: No guards needed. No informants. No tape to review. Algorithms watch everything, and more importantly, they predict.

The evolution isn’t just more surveillance. It’s a shift from observation to anticipation.


Foucault Saw This Coming

The French philosopher Michel Foucault, in Discipline and Punish (1975), used Bentham’s Panopticon as a metaphor for modern power. His key insight:

When you believe you might be watched at any moment, you begin to watch yourself. You self-censor. You conform. Surveillance becomes internalized until the watcher is no longer needed.

This is the profound difference between Flock and your phone. A Flock camera exerts external control…it catches you after the fact. But algorithmic surveillance achieves the Panopticon’s true goal: it shapes behavior before it happens.You hesitate before searching a controversial term. You think twice before texting a joke. You curate your digital self, knowing it’s all logged. 


The Double-Edged Sword

Here’s the maddening part: the same technology that surveils us is genuinely useful.

  • Your maps app predicts traffic because it’s tracking millions of people, including you.
  • Your health app catches an irregular heartbeat because it monitors your body 24/7.
  • Your assistant answers instantly because it’s learned your habits.

Convenience is the currency we use to purchase our own surveillance.This is what Shoshana Zuboff calls surveillance capitalism: a system where human experience is the raw material, and the product is prediction. Not just predicting what you’ll buy…but nudging what you’ll do, think, and feel. Elections, moods, movements, and markets can be shaped by whoever holds the data.Social engineering at scale no longer requires a Stasi officer. It requires an A/B test.


Winston and Julia, 2026

Recall 1984. Winston Smith and Julia flee to a quiet field in the countryside to escape the telescreens, to find one unwatched moment of intimacy and freedom.Now transplant them to today.They leave their phones behind (good…that defeats the location tracking, the microphones, the app telemetry). They drive to the countryside. But:

  • Their license plates are logged by Flock cameras on the way out of town.
  • Satellites image the open field from orbit.
  • Their absence from the network is itself a data point, an anomaly worth flagging.
  • The purchase of gas, the toll on the highway, the cell tower ping from a phone one of them forgot to fully power down.

The countryside offered Winston a blind spot because Oceania’s surveillance was physical and fixed…telescreens on walls. Today’s surveillance is ambient and predictive. There is no field far enough.But here’s the twist Orwell didn’t fully anticipate: Winston wouldn’t need to be forced. He’d carry the telescreen willingly, in his pocket, and check it 96 times a day. Julia would tag their location in a photo. The Party wouldn’t have to install anything. We volunteer.


So, What the Flock?

Flock cameras deserve scrutiny. Fight them, regulate them, demand transparency. But recognize the disproportion:

Fighting Flock cameras while ignoring your data footprint is like installing a deadbolt on a house with no walls.

The cameras on the poles are the surveillance we’re allowed to see, the acceptable target, the visible outrage, the distraction that lets the real machinery hum along quietly. The genuine architecture of prediction and control isn’t bolted to a lamppost. It’s in the cloud, in the algorithm, in the terms of service you scrolled past.The most effective surveillance state isn’t one that watches you against your will.It’s one you happily fund, feed, and carry everywhere, while pointing angrily at the camera on the corner.


If there is enough interest, I will divulge other ways and places you are “observed.” Or you can just ask Alexa.

On a completely different note, I have released a new book that asks the question, “Are You a Witch?” The link will take you to my author page, where you can browse a multitude of books on a variety of subjects. There is something for almost everyone.Thanks for stopping by, and feel free to comment below.

So the next time you see a Flock camera and feel that flash of indignation, ask yourself: what’s in my pocket, and what does it already know?That’s what the flock we should really be talking about.

BTW does FLOCK mean (For the Love Of Cats?) Probabaly not… More like flock of birds, or cars…or people..

Best