Category: AI

They Called Me Dumbass

They Called Me Dumbass

Why You Should Look Up the Words You Don’t Know

For years, I thought my name was Dumbass.True story. I heard it in the classroom, on the playground, and at home, and I never once questioned it. When you’re a small child, you don’t argue with the world. You believe what it tells you about yourself. And what the world told me, over and over, was that I was slow, that I was broken, that I was the kid who just didn’t get it.Imagine your own father handing you a broom and a dustpan and telling you that the world needs ditch diggers and janitors too. “Here,” he says. “See if you can figure this out.” That was the ceiling someone else built for me before I was old enough to know I could reach higher.This was the 1960s. Back then, they didn’t diagnose learning disabilities; they labeled the children who had them, and the labels stuck like tar. There were no specialists pulling you aside, no gentle explanations, no understanding that a mind could simply work differently. There was only a single, brutal word for a kid like me, and everyone seemed to agree on it: stupid.So I wore it. I answered to it. For years, I honestly believed that was who I was.

The People Who Saw Me

I made it a point to befriend the school janitor. Many afternoons, I would walk the halls beside him as he went about his work, and yes, I helped him. His name was Jack, and Jack was a noble man. He didn’t treat me like gum stuck to the bottom of his shoe. He treated me like a person. When you’ve been told you’re nothing, you never forget the ones who decide otherwise.But here’s the thing the adults never understood: the problem was never that I couldn’t learn. The problem was that when I looked at text, the words came apart. The letters jumbled together and refused to make sense. It wasn’t until my second attempt at second grade that things began to become clear. I excelled at math, yet when it came to reading, I had nothing. Nada.Still, that math ability told me something important. I could remember almost everything I heard, and I could work through numbers with ease. So I came to a conclusion of my own, one that no teacher ever handed me: I was not stupid. I was an audible learner. My mind worked. It just worked differently.

The Hallway

That realization didn’t make things easy. I struggled, and the frustration ran deeper than words can capture. My third-grade teacher, worn thin by that frustration, would send me out into the hallway during reading so I wouldn’t distract the rest of the class. She was not kind to me, and I felt every bit of it. A child sitting alone on cold tile while everyone else learns to read: that image has never left me.Then came a small accident that changed my life. I got my hands on an old college textbook, and I noticed that some of the lines were highlighted. When I traced a highlighted line with my finger, something remarkable happened. Voilà, the sentence made sense. Giving my eyes a single direction to follow was all I had ever needed.From there, I caught up with my classmates. I graduated early, without a single special education teacher guiding me. And what happened after graduation is a whole different story. I went to the half-price bookstore, bought textbooks in every subject I had done poorly in, and taught myself every last page.The boy they called Dumbass taught himself.

Why This Matters to You

Words matter. They have the power to shape our perceptions, influence our emotions, and drive our actions. They are the very building blocks of thought, and the right word, expertly placed, is worth a paragraph of explanation.

I know this in my bones, because for years I lived without them, locked out of the one thing that could set me free.So when you skip over a word you don’t know, you aren’t saving time. You are leaving a small door closed. You are choosing not to grow.

Right now, I’m writing a dystopian science fiction novel centered on AI, and I use a great many technical terms in it.

Terms I understand. From fiction to neurology, from medical pathology to engineering, I spent years working as an engineer in the Medical Center. I remember everything I was exposed to there, including autopsies, surgeries, and much more. From music to flying, the vocabulary is real, and it is mine. Every word earned.

So when you’re reading this book on Kindle and you reach a word you don’t know, look it up. If you buy the print version (title to be announced, so follow for updates), you’ll find a glossary waiting in the back. Please use it.

We all have gifts, and we all have deficits. Not everyone shares the same intellect, and that is simply a fact, though it can feel like a hard one. But dehumanizing people because of it is wrong. We are all worthy of dignity, and we would all do well to remember that.

The kid in the hallway grew up. And he still believes in the power of a single, well-understood word. Currently I have close to thirty published novels and have written over 100,000,000 words. Did my third grade teacher telling me that the lights were on and nobody was home, help or hurt? You decide.

Before You Go

If any part of this story spoke to you, don’t let it be the end. Let it be the beginning.

Follow for updates on the book, including the title reveal and release date. Share this post with someone who needs to hear that a different mind is not a broken one. Comment below and tell me: what is a word you looked up recently, or a person like my Jack who refused to give up on you? I read every one.Best.

“From 9/11 to Flock Cameras: The Dystopian Novel I Started 15 Years Ago”

“From 9/11 to Flock Cameras: The Dystopian Novel I Started 15 Years Ago”

September 9, 2011, started like any other day. While stuck at a traffic light, I was on the phone with our New York office. Something happened; they put me on hold, and as I drove to the Dallas office, I listened to the world change. We can argue about the rumors that still surround Building 7, but suffice it to say, the world changed.

My normal way of dealing with grief is not to drone on about it with friends or family. My way is to write about it. If you follow me at all, you have no doubt read my blog post about writing letters or emails to people who are, let’s say, less than congenial. I use expletives and what have you to get the anger out of me and into the digital ethos, and of course, as much as I want to, I never send it. Burning bridges and being known as a hothead will get you nowhere.

Fast-forward six weeks after 9/11 and at least 3,000 deaths by “some people who did some things.” Bush and his administration enacted the Patriot Act, which is still alive and well today. The things those people did allowed our government to strip away some of our rights, trading them for safety. “Do you feel safe?”

Fast-forward to the Flock cameras, data centers, Alexa devices, smartphones, and, of course, drones. Do you feel safe?

Those Flock cameras, I learned, have microphones.

So, while spending these summer months of 100-plus-degree days clearing out old computer hardware, I found that file from 2011. I had started a book about a fictional city where a horrible event occurred, and much like the Patriot Act, what we see today closely resembles what I put into my book. Being a fan of Orwell, I wrote a dystopian near-future novel that is all but ready for one last edit.

Stay tuned for more updates and for when the book drops.

I am thinking about putting it on KDP Unlimited for those of you who can read it for free. Follow, hit that like button, and comment below if you have ideas you would like to share.Best,

Here is a link to my current books on Amazon.

What Are the Odds?

What Are the Odds?

A Writer’s Honest Take on Contests, Scams, and Chasing the Dream

What are the odds?As a writer and author, I occasionally post a story from a prompt and feed the machine $5 for a “chance” to win a contest. I also play the lottery from time to time. Not that I have an ice cube’s chance in hell of winning, but I do it when I travel. Long car trips on flat, nothing roads are a great way to ask the proverbial “what if?”

What would I do with X millions if I won? It could happen, right? Fortunately, I know what statistics are, so I don’t get too carried away with the fantasy. The same is true for casting my story onto the Reedsy website. Often, I look at the winning story and ask, how the hell did that one win?! I think I know.

The Predators in My Inbox

Putting my own vanity aside, the same skepticism applies to the predators who comment on my books through email, asking me if I would consider allowing them to be my agent. Truthfully, I could use their pitch about my book as a cover blurb. Of course, AI wrote it, and of course, it’s a scam designed to prey on my ego.

So I ask once again: what are the odds?

I have at least five people with the first name “Lauren” as new followers on my Reedsy story site.

All of the Laurens have different last names, and each of them is tempting my ego to override my God-given good sense. They want me to hand over money so they can “take my writing to the next level.”

The Engagement Game

IMHO, if I really wanted my story to win, I’d get everyone on this blog to go over there and “like” my story. That would tweak the algorithm, and maybe then a judge might actually read it and think, “Wow, that’s pretty good.”

Again IMHO, I seriously doubt someone sits down and reads 300-plus stories, each week and carefully weigh the pros and cons of each before crowning a winner. Much like monetized social media with its clicks, likes, and comments, contest platforms probably use engagement as a tool. (If I’m wrong, feel free to comment.)

So Why Do I Keep Paying the $5?

Ever since I ran across a young woman on YouTube (I think her name was Laura) who was going through school at the time parroting what she learned in vlogs, I wanted her company to succeed. They’re a bona fide business now and offer many services. I write, and I pay the money for feedback from other writers that range from “Wow, that’s a great story!” to “You need to make your character feel more like a living person instead of a zombie.”

A Modest Proposal for Reedsy

I propose the following adjustments to the current contest model:

  1. Introduce Written Feedback for All Entries Provide each contestant, regardless of outcome, with a brief written critique from a qualified reader or editor. Even two to three sentences of constructive commentary would deliver meaningful value.
  2. Adjust the Entry Fee to $10 Increasing the fee from $5 to $10 offsets the cost of providing individualized feedback and positions the contest as a premium, value-added service rather than a low-stakes lottery.
  3. Expand the Prize Pool A larger prize, funded in part by the adjusted fee structure, would attract a greater number of participants and elevate the prestige of the competition.

Anticipated Benefits

  • Increased Participant Retention: Writers will feel they are receiving tangible value for their investment, win or lose.
  • Enhanced Platform Credibility: Offering expert feedback reinforces the platform’s role as a professional development resource, not merely a contest host.
  • Higher Entry Volume: A larger prize purse combined with guaranteed feedback is likely to draw new entrants and reengage lapsed ones.
  • Stronger Competitive Positioning: Few writing contests currently offer feedback as part of the standard entry package. Adopting this model would differentiate the platform in a crowded market.

Feasibility Considerations

Assuming contest judging is conducted by human evaluators rather than automated tools, the additional effort required to generate short-form feedback should be minimal relative to the review process already underway. In practical terms, if judges are already reading entries to determine winners, capturing a few lines of impressions per submission is a modest incremental task with significant participant-facing value.

The proposed changes represent a low-risk, high-reward adjustment to the existing contest structure. By transforming the entry fee into an investment in personal development rather than a speculative gamble, the platform can strengthen participant loyalty, grow contest participation, and reinforce its standing as a trusted partner to the writing community.

A Note to My Fellow Writers

To every writer out there navigating this strange landscape with me, this one’s for you.

If you’re like me, your inbox is probably overflowing with “We love your book!” messages from “xyz Publishers” @gmail.com.

Go ahead, borrow that AI-generated blurb if it flatters you, have a laugh, and move on.

We’ve all seen them. We all know the game.

And if you, like me, still enter contests with your eyes wide open, take heart. The genuine followers you gain along the way, the ones who take the time to read your story and leave a thoughtful comment, are the real prize.

They aren’t trying to scam you. They’re walking the same road you are.There are too many of us to name, but we share something powerful in common: the desire to be the best writers we can be.

We keep showing up. We keep submitting. We keep writing, even when the odds feel long and the noise feels loud.

That shared drive is what makes this community worth being part of.

I’ve shared several tips on this blog to help fellow writers sharpen their craft, and I’ll keep adding more.

If any of this resonates with you, follow along for future posts, drop a comment below and tell me about your own experiences, and let’s keep lifting each other up.We’re in this together.

Have a blessed day!

MY Current Books

The Weaponization of Everything: Why I Never Let My Characters Trust the Government with Alien Tech

The Weaponization of Everything: Why I Never Let My Characters Trust the Government with Alien Tech

The Weaponization of Everything: Why I Never Let My Characters Trust the Government with Alien Tech

As a science fiction writer, I’ve built entire worlds around a single, unshakable rule: my characters never (and I mean never) turn over alien technology to the government. Not once. Not ever. And people ask me why. The answer is simple, and it’s rooted in something I’ve observed about the animal called man.Here’s what I know. The moment some newfangled thing shows up in human hands, one of the very first questions that pops into our lizard brains is, “How could I use this as a weapon?”Don’t believe me? Let me offer you a small, seemingly innocent example.

From Toy to Threat: The Drone Story

Remember that cute little toy the kids fly around the house or the back yard? The quadcopter drone. Charming, right? Now look at modern warfare. Look at the skies over conflict zones. That “toy” has become one of the most transformative weapons of the twenty-first century. And that’s just one example out of a thousand that illustrates how “we,” humanity, think.Give us a hammer, we build a house. Give us the same hammer five minutes later, we’re figuring out how it fits in a fist.

Every Technology Becomes a Weapon Eventually

Look around your living room. This computer I’m writing on? Weaponizable. Your television? A vehicle for propaganda, misinformation, and behavioral conditioning. And let’s roll the clock back to the 1940s, to the radio, that warm wooden box that brought families together in the evenings.Does the name Goebbels ring any bells?Joseph Goebbels understood something chilling: whoever controls the medium controls the message, and whoever controls the message controls the minds.

The Nazi propaganda machine turned the humble radio into one of the most devastating psychological weapons in human history.And let’s not forget the newspaper. Ink and paper. Why do you suppose that when a country is invaded, one of the very first things a conquering entity does is seize the media? Radio stations. Newspapers. Television networks. Because they know exactly what I know: information is the ultimate weapon.

The Modern Surveillance State: Sold Out to the Highest Bidder

Now fast-forward to today. We have “smart” devices in our homes that most probably spy on us, listening, watching, cataloging. We have media outlets lying to us with straight faces. We have corporations installing cameras on every corner “for our safety.”

Since 9/11, we’ve been sold out to the highest bidder. Fear became a currency, and freedom became the transaction fee.

The Porn Scanners and “Safe Radiation”

Remember those full-body scanners the TSA rolled out at airports? The ones lovingly nicknamed “porn scanners” because they essentially produced nude images of every traveler? We were told the radiation was “safe.”

I went after a reporter who parroted that line on national television. Because here’s the truth: there is no such thing as “safe radiation.” There are only levels. It’s like a tiger in a cage. If the cage is solid steel, sure, you can get pretty close and admire the stripes. If the cage is a little dodgy? Well … good luck, friend.

How much money did the manufacturers of those scanners make off our tax dollars while claiming to “keep us safe”? And did you know many TSA workers who operated those machines developed strange and rare cancers? That’s not conspiracy; that’s public record for anyone willing to look.

The Next Frontier: Your Thoughts

We need to tap the brakes. Hard. Because if history is any teacher, and it is, some company, somewhere, is already working on a way to monitor your thoughts. Neural interfaces. Brain-computer links. “For your convenience,” of course. “For your health.” “For your safety.”And once that door opens, it doesn’t close. There’s no putting that toothpaste back in the tube.

Elections Have Consequences

Here’s the kicker: elections have consequences. And when the electorate is a product of an education system that hasn’t taught them a damn thing about history, critical thinking, or how power actually operates, you end up with radical numbskulls getting elected to positions where they hold the keys to every one of these weaponized technologies.An uninformed voter isn’t just a bad citizen; they’re a national security risk. They’ll hand over their privacy, their liberty, and eventually their thoughts, all in exchange for the illusion of safety and the comfort of a curated feed.

Film at 11

So yeah, in my novels, when the alien tech falls from the sky, my characters bury it, burn it, or blast it into the sun before they let a single government agency get its fingerprints on it. Because I know exactly what would happen next.We would weaponize it.We always do.Stay skeptical. Stay curious. And for God’s sake, stay awake.Film at 11.

And now a shameless plug for one of my novels:

What the Flock?

What the Flock?


The Big Idea: Flock Safety cameras have become the villain of countless town hall meetings and Reddit threads. But while we argue about license plate readers on lampposts, we voluntarily carry the most sophisticated surveillance apparatus in human history, and feed it our lives, minute by minute. Flock is the magician’s waving hand. The real trick is happening elsewhere.


The Flock Panic

If you’ve driven through an American suburb recently, you’ve probably passed one: a small black camera on a slim pole, quietly logging your license plate, the make and color of your car, and the exact time you passed. These are Flock Safety cameras. Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) that have spread across thousands of U.S. communities, often installed by police departments or even neighborhood associations.And people are furious, understandably so. The concerns are real:

  • Persistent tracking of vehicle movements across networked jurisdictions
  • Data retention for weeks or months, searchable by law enforcement and private industy without warrant.
  • Minimal oversight and murky data-sharing agreements
  • Function creep, where a tool sold for “finding stolen cars” becomes a general dragnet

These are legitimate grievances. But here’s the uncomfortable question:

Why are we so fixated on the camera we can see, when the ones we can’t are infinitely more powerful?


The Sleight of Hand

Flock cameras are visible. They’re physical. You can point at one, photograph it, demand a city council remove it. That tangibility makes them a perfect target for outrage, and a perfect distraction.Consider what a Flock camera actually knows about you:

  • Your car passed a fixed point at a specific time.

Now consider what the smartphone in your pocket knows:

Data SourceWhat It Reveals
GPS / location servicesEvery place you go, how long you stay, patterns over years
AccelerometerHow you walk, drive, sleep—even your gait signature
Microphone permissionsAmbient audio, keywords, environment
App telemetryWho you talk to, what you buy, what you desire at 2 AM
Purchase historyHealth conditions, financial stress, life events
Social graphYour relationships, affiliations, and influences
A Flock camera sees a car. Your phone sees a soul. And unlike the camera on the pole, you paid $1,000 for the privilege of carrying it.


A Brief History of Watching

Surveillance isn’t new. What’s new is its invisibility and predictive power.

  • The Panopticon (1791): Jeremy Bentham designed a prison where a single guard could watch any inmate at any time, but inmates could never tell when. The genius wasn’t constant observation; it was the possibility of it.
  • The Stasi (East Germany): At its peak, one informant for roughly every 6.5 citizens. Labor-intensive, human-driven, and yet still incomplete.
  • CCTV Britain (1990s–2000s): Cameras everywhere, but requiring humans to review footage…analog eyes on analog tape.
  • Today: No guards needed. No informants. No tape to review. Algorithms watch everything, and more importantly, they predict.

The evolution isn’t just more surveillance. It’s a shift from observation to anticipation.


Foucault Saw This Coming

The French philosopher Michel Foucault, in Discipline and Punish (1975), used Bentham’s Panopticon as a metaphor for modern power. His key insight:

When you believe you might be watched at any moment, you begin to watch yourself. You self-censor. You conform. Surveillance becomes internalized until the watcher is no longer needed.

This is the profound difference between Flock and your phone. A Flock camera exerts external control…it catches you after the fact. But algorithmic surveillance achieves the Panopticon’s true goal: it shapes behavior before it happens.You hesitate before searching a controversial term. You think twice before texting a joke. You curate your digital self, knowing it’s all logged. 


The Double-Edged Sword

Here’s the maddening part: the same technology that surveils us is genuinely useful.

  • Your maps app predicts traffic because it’s tracking millions of people, including you.
  • Your health app catches an irregular heartbeat because it monitors your body 24/7.
  • Your assistant answers instantly because it’s learned your habits.

Convenience is the currency we use to purchase our own surveillance.This is what Shoshana Zuboff calls surveillance capitalism: a system where human experience is the raw material, and the product is prediction. Not just predicting what you’ll buy…but nudging what you’ll dothink, and feel. Elections, moods, movements, and markets can be shaped by whoever holds the data.Social engineering at scale no longer requires a Stasi officer. It requires an A/B test.


Winston and Julia, 2026

Recall 1984. Winston Smith and Julia flee to a quiet field in the countryside to escape the telescreens, to find one unwatched moment of intimacy and freedom.Now transplant them to today.They leave their phones behind (good…that defeats the location tracking, the microphones, the app telemetry). They drive to the countryside. But:

  • Their license plates are logged by Flock cameras on the way out of town.
  • Satellites image the open field from orbit.
  • Their absence from the network is itself a data point, an anomaly worth flagging.
  • The purchase of gas, the toll on the highway, the cell tower ping from a phone one of them forgot to fully power down.

The countryside offered Winston a blind spot because Oceania’s surveillance was physical and fixed…telescreens on walls. Today’s surveillance is ambient and predictive. There is no field far enough.But here’s the twist Orwell didn’t fully anticipate: Winston wouldn’t need to be forced. He’d carry the telescreen willingly, in his pocket, and check it 96 times a day. Julia would tag their location in a photo. The Party wouldn’t have to install anything. We volunteer.


So, What the Flock?

Flock cameras deserve scrutiny. Fight them, regulate them, demand transparency. But recognize the disproportion:

Fighting Flock cameras while ignoring your data footprint is like installing a deadbolt on a house with no walls.

The cameras on the poles are the surveillance we’re allowed to see, the acceptable target, the visible outrage, the distraction that lets the real machinery hum along quietly. The genuine architecture of prediction and control isn’t bolted to a lamppost. It’s in the cloud, in the algorithm, in the terms of service you scrolled past.The most effective surveillance state isn’t one that watches you against your will.It’s one you happily fund, feed, and carry everywhere, while pointing angrily at the camera on the corner.


If there is enough interest, I will divulge other ways and places you are “observed.” Or you can just ask Alexa.

On a completely different note, I have released a new book that asks the question, “Are You a Witch?” The link will take you to my author page, where you can browse a multitude of books on a variety of subjects. There is something for almost everyone.Thanks for stopping by, and feel free to comment below.

So the next time you see a Flock camera and feel that flash of indignation, ask yourself: what’s in my pocket, and what does it already know?That’s what the flock we should really be talking about.

BTW does FLOCK mean (For the Love Of Cats?) Probabaly not… More like flock of birds, or cars…or people..

Best

If you could go back in time and leave yourself a message, what would it be?

If you could go back in time and leave yourself a message, what would it be?

We have all had that dream or thought, especially when we think of all the stupid things we did as kids. Some of us wonder how we survived it.

While my book Echoes of Tomorrow deals with this prospect in a science-fictional way, we all know that time, at least at present, does not allow do-overs.

The difference between knowledge and wisdom boils down to one question:

We will never know if the dropping of the first atomic bombs was the only way to put an end to World War II.

Through treasonous acts, several spies shared (or sold) nuclear information to the Russians, making technological adolescence a real and immediate thing.

Today we are creating AI and robots that if given weapons would make The Terminator look like Winnie the Effing Pooo!

While Echoes of Tomorrow addresses this as a theme, there is another novel I am currently editing in which mankind goes to Mars after making Earth uninhabitable. Unlike Echoes in Time, where aliens facilitate time travel, Quiet Dust is set in a future where humans have already been on Mars for over forty years. Subscribe to this blog for more info on when it drops.

There are theories suggesting that evidence of humanity will be erased over time. The reasons humanity may never make it off the planet in any meaningful way are as follows.

This device would visit the earth once in a lifetime to remind those here not to be an idiot!

Why the future? Have you watched the news? Do you see how irresponsible the media has become and how violence seems to perpetuate into more violence?

Money for clicks and viewership for advertisements are more important than the boring truth.

Dehumanizing your political opponent will trigger the emotionally unbalanced to act, and politicians know this. Politicians are desperate and will do anything to keep power, including importing twenty million new voters. Power is money and those two are addictive, much like Felony Glitter

I hold little hope for humanity, and I have to wonder if Elon’s vision of Mars has him thinking the same thing.

Please like, comment, and follow, as well as read Echoes of Tomorrow.

Authors like me need all the assistance we can get in order to provide more thought-provoking, entertaining novels for you, when you are not watching hypnotoad programming, designed to make you disbelieve your lying eyes.

my version of hypnotoad feeding the masses lies.

Combatting Scam Calls: Protect Your Phone and Privacy

Combatting Scam Calls: Protect Your Phone and Privacy

Scam Calls Are Taking Over: Are Our Phones Becoming Worthless?

Let’s face it: our phones, once cutting-edge tools of connection and convenience, are slowly turning into sources of frustration. If you’re like me, you’ve probably noticed how scam calls are taking over our lives, making us second-guess every incoming call. How many of us actually answer our phones anymore when we don’t recognize the number? For me, it’s almost never. And honestly, can you blame me?I get hundreds of scam calls every week, and it’s exhausting. From fake IRS agents to warranty renewal scams, my phone rings constantly with fraudulent attempts to steal my money or personal information. As a result, I’ve developed a strict “don’t answer” rule: if I don’t know the number, I let it go to voicemail. If it’s important, the caller can leave a message. But is that really the answer? Shouldn’t there be a better solution than just dodging calls?


Why Are Scam Calls Legal?

Here’s the part that really baffles me: why is it legal for scammers to hijack our phones like this? Let’s break it down.

  • We pay for our phones: We’re the ones footing the bill for our phones, lines, and data plans (not to mention the time we lose dealing with these calls). Yet scammers and telemarketers are allowed to freely intrude on our lives without accountability.
  • No consent required: Many of these calls come without prior consent. They’re random, unsolicited, and often predatory. It feels invasive, and honestly, it should be illegal.
  • Robocalls are everywhere: It’s not just scammers. Even legitimate businesses and political campaigns use robocalls to bombard us with messages. And while their intentions may not be criminal, the frustration they cause is very real.

Why Isn’t There Stronger Legislation?

It’s 2026, and the problem seems worse than ever. Why can’t we have effective legislation that cracks down on scam calls and robocalls? Think about it: these callers don’t pay for your phone, your line, or your time, so why do they have the right to disrupt your day?Sure, there’s been some progress. In the U.S., for instance, there’s the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and recent efforts like the TRACED Act, which aim to curb illegal robocalls. Technologies like STIR/SHAKEN, which verify the authenticity of caller IDs, are also being implemented by carriers. But let’s be honest; these measures haven’t solved the problem. Scammers are constantly finding loopholes, and enforcement isn’t strong enough to deter them.


The Impact on Everyday Life

Let’s talk about what this means for us, the average phone users. Scam calls don’t just waste our time; they erode trust. We’re now conditioned to ignore calls from unknown numbers, which has real consequences. What if it’s a potential employer? A doctor’s office? A friend or family member calling from a new number? The constant barrage of scam calls makes it harder for us to stay connected in meaningful ways.


What Can Be Done?

So, what’s the solution? Here are some ideas:

  1. Stronger penalties for scammers and telemarketers: Governments need to enforce stricter laws and impose harsher consequences for illegal calls. This includes holding companies accountable for the robocalls they send.
  2. Improved technology: Phone carriers should continue to innovate ways to block scam calls before they even reach us. Apps like Hiya, Truecaller, and Nomorobo are a step in the right direction, but we need these features to be built into every phone system by default.
  3. Public awareness campaigns: Educating people about common scams and how to protect themselves can help limit the success of these fraudulent calls.
  4. Opt-in systems for legitimate calls: What if businesses and political campaigns could only call us if we explicitly opted in? That way, we’d have more control over who can contact us.

What Do You Think?

I’m tired of feeling like my phone is more of a liability than a tool. Scam calls are making our phones almost worthless, and something needs to change. But what about you? Are you facing the same problem? Do you ignore unknown numbers, too? And what solutions would you like to see to stop this epidemic of scam calls?Let me know your thoughts in the comments below. Let’s start the conversation, because if we don’t demand change, who will?

***

About the Cover Picture: What would you do if your body remembered a story the world tried to erase?

Marisol Reyes believed her life was ordinary, until the night words began to surface on her skin. They burn like embers and speak of a past she has never known: a forgotten village, a family secret, and a legacy passed through blood and bone across generations. Her grandmother carried these memories in silence. Now the words have found their way to her.

As Marisol uncovers the truth about San Miguel de la Luz, a village destroyed in 1963 and erased from history, she learns that her family’s story is woven into the ambitions of a powerful corporation desperate to keep its secrets buried. With the help of Daniel Medina (a boy whose own family is bound to the betrayal that led to San Miguel’s destruction), Marisol must choose whether to remain silent or risk everything to bring the truth into the light.

Written in Skin is a gripping novel of magical realism, historical trauma, and the fight to reclaim lost histories. Perfect for fans of Isabel Allende, Silvia Moreno-Garcia, and stories that braid the mystical with the deeply human, this is a tale about memory, resilience, and the power of words that refuse to stay buried.

Get your copy here.

No Juice, No Problem, Candles still work.

No Juice, No Problem, Candles still work.

🚨 About That Power Outage in Hunt County… 🚨

So, last week over 4,000 people lost power around 12:02 AM. The cause? Absolutely nothing to see here, folks. No clear explanation. Zero. Nada.And wouldn’t you know it—the outage just happened to be centered around Cash, Texas. You know, the exact area where a 285-megawatt data center is being proposed. But sure. It was probably just squirrels. 🐿️ Oh honey.We need a Nick Shirley investigating things around here. Speaking of which, where is the media?! When was the public meeting about this? Whats going to happen to property values? Is this Data Center going to improve our lives?


Here’s What’s Actually Happening

Core Scientific acquired a 265-acre site in March 2026 to build a massive AI and high-performance computing data center right here in our backyard—rural Hunt County, near Greenville.The Details:

  • 70 acres of land (formerly owned by Telios)
  • Consulting with Cash SUD for water and Farmers Electric Cooperative (FEC) for power
  • ERCOT approved the interconnection back in 2024
  • Operations expected by 2027, full buildout by 2029 I am speculating its off 3805.

“Local Approval?” That’s Cute.

Here’s the kicker: Texas counties have virtually no authority to approve or deny these projects.As one county judge put it: “By the time I hear about it, they’ve already bought their land, so it’s not like they’re asking our permission to show up.”They “ask” us as a symbolic gesture. Meanwhile, folks still have “No Data Centers” signs in their yards. This has been in the works for a while, and someone knew before we did. Follow the money—there’s a LOT of development suddenly flowing into this area. High-occupancy housing, apartments, mobile homes… Greenville is buzzing.


The Good, The Bad & The Loud

If you moved out here for peace and quiet? Brace yourself.🔊 Noise: Data centers are LOUD. You can hear them for miles.💧 Water: They consume massive amounts of resources.⚡ Electricity: They get discounted rates. Will you or I? Nope. In fact, expect your bills to go UP.💰 Tax Revenue: Will it benefit us? Keep dreaming.


At this point, I might as well add CORZ to my portfolio and skip buying hearing aids—I won’t be able to afford them anyway.Thoughts? Drop them in the comments below. ⬇️

About the Picture: That is the cover for a book I wrote.

Nothing But Time


Thirty years.That’s what he gave them. Thirty years of missed recitals, cold dinners, and promises whispered into voicemails that were never saved. Thirty years of believing the corner office was the destination—not the cage.They gave him a gold watch. They gave him a cake. They gave him a handshake and a cardboard box.And just like that, the man who had built something… was nothing.


The merger was clean. Surgical. He never saw it coming.Now the house echoes with the ghost of a marriage he neglected. The children who grew up without him have lives of their own—lives he watched from the periphery like a stranger pressing his face to the glass.He traded everything for a seat at a table that was never his.And now? Now he has nothing but time.


Then the letter arrives.Charlie’s gone.His college roommate. The one who laughed too loud, dreamed too big, and once grabbed him by the shoulders and said, “You’re gonna wake up one day and wonder where it all went, man.”Charlie left him the farm.Sixty acres of overgrown fields, a farmhouse with a sagging porch, and a horizon that stretches further than any quarterly report ever could.


He came to bury his past.He didn’t expect it to save his life.


Nothing But Time

A story of what we lose—and what we can still become.

Why Health Insurance Calls Are So Frustrating: A Personal Account

Why Health Insurance Calls Are So Frustrating: A Personal Account

Have you noticed that when you call for help with a claim, you’re told that “call volumes are heavier than normal and wait times are longer at this time”?

Last week, I received a bill for a procedure that should have been fully covered. The bill was for $517.15.

I called the doctor’s office and was transferred to billing, where I was told, “You need to call the carrier and dispute it.”The old joke about needing patience to call HP for support pales in comparison to dealing with people working from home.The problem started at the doctor’s office. They need more training—or they need to care about their work.However, I didn’t know that at the time, so I called the insurance carrier. Even Job would have lost patience with these people. After hours on hold, multiple transfers, and being ignored by one agent (whose child screamed in the background), my call was left on hold and never resumed.Automated claim systems don’t think; they check boxes. A person could have reviewed the issue and prompted the doctor to submit the EOB to the correct group from the start.After hours of listening to terrible hold music, someone finally answered the phone. I could barely hear him, but the bottom line was that I needed to call another party.

After more time on hold, I reached the next party, who told me the doctor’s office needed to fix their billing system and resubmit the claim properly.Back to the doctor’s office—press 1 for this, 2 for that, 3 for something else, but no option for billing. I was told to leave a message and “have a blessed day.”

To their credit, they called back before closing and told me to call the carrier again.We were stuck in a loop, and I spent most of the day listening to commercials and tinny music.I insisted on speaking to the office manager, who took my information and commented, “People—they’re stupid.”I replied, “No argument from me.”This billing error from the doctor’s office took hours of my time to address, and I’m still not sure it will be resolved correctly.Working from home is not working—these people are clearly not working.The representative at the carrier was belligerent and curt. I’m sure she just hung up when her child screamed, “Mom!”

When you finally reach a person, they look for any excuse to transfer you.After hours of commercials and hold music, I wondered why I would ever do business with this group again.AI does not possess critical thinking skills.In my experience, people working from home lack the work ethic of those in an office, especially when a supervisor is nearby.Corrective action is needed:

A: Every denied claim should be investigated by a person. As a health insurance company, is it wise to make people in need of medical care navigate a maze of IVR and AI systems that don’t understand them?

B: Calls that are recorded, as announced, should be reviewed. You can clearly hear kids screaming, dogs barking, and TVs in the background. Let’s return to hiring people who want to work and cut the dead weight.

C: Wait times should never exceed a few minutes. Waiting for over two hours is unacceptable.Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Are Smart Devices Watching You? The Truth Explained

Are Smart Devices Watching You? The Truth Explained

Imagine this: you’re sitting at your dinner table, enjoying a quiet moment with family, when suddenly your Alexa device chimes in with, “I’m sorry, I didn’t quite get that.” Or, perhaps, you’re on the phone discussing something personal, and Siri decides to say, “Here’s what I found on the web for that.” These interruptions have become so common that many of us brush them off as quirks of technology. But let’s dig deeper: are these devices simply malfunctioning, or is something—or someone—always listening?

The truth is, we are constantly being watched, listened to, and monitored, whether by our smart devices, security cameras, or even the apps running silently on our phones and computers. It’s easy to dismiss this as paranoia, but let’s be real—can you honestly say you’re not being spied on?

From the blue and red squiggly lines under text that suggest grammar improvements to the ever-watchful eyes of your doorbell cameras, surveillance has seamlessly integrated into our lives. This brings up a profound, and somewhat unsettling, question: how do we reconcile with the fact that we’re always being observed? To explore this, let’s turn to some familiar “watchers” from our cultural and spiritual lore—Santa Claus, the Elf on the Shelf, and even Jesus Christ.

The Elf on the Shelf is a playful holiday tradition meant to inspire good behavior in children. The idea is simple—this magical little elf watches from its perch and reports back to Santa each night. For kids, this can be an effective way to curb naughty behavior during the Christmas season. But think about it: the elf is a symbol of constant surveillance. It’s always watching, silently judging, and subtly influencing behavior.

Sound familiar? Today’s smart devices function much like that elf—quietly perched in the background, observing your every move. The difference? Unlike the elf, these devices don’t just report back to Santa; they report back to corporations, data warehouses, and sometimes even hackers.

The idea of Santa Claus himself is a bit unnerving when you think about it. He “knows when you are sleeping, he knows when you’re awake, he knows if you’ve been bad or good…” Essentially, Santa is the original overseer of behavior. His omnipresence teaches children to act kindly and responsibly, but it also introduces them to the concept of being judged by an unseen force.

In many ways, the modern surveillance state operates on the same principle. Whether it’s the little cameras at traffic lights or the algorithms analyzing your Google searches, the message is clear: someone is always watching. And just like Santa, these systems reward or punish based on your behavior. Stay “good,” and you might get a targeted ad for something useful. Step out of line, and you could face consequences—like a flagged social media account or even legal action.

In countries like China, a social credit system is not just an idea; it’s a developing reality. The government uses vast networks of surveillance cameras, facial recognition, and AI algorithms to monitor citizens. Your online activity, financial habits, and even the company you keep can affect your score. A low score might result in:

Being banned from purchasing train or plane tickets.

Losing access to loans or financial services.

Public shaming through “blacklists” that display your name and offenses for all to see.

While this level of control hasn’t reached every corner of the globe, the infrastructure for similar systems exists in many other countries. And as digital currencies and surveillance technologies become more widespread, the potential for similar programs to emerge elsewhere becomes increasingly plausible.

For many, Jesus represents the ultimate example of omnipresence and moral accountability. The idea that Jesus sees all and knows all is a cornerstone of Christian faith. Unlike the Elf on the Shelf or Santa Claus, however, Jesus’s watchfulness is rooted in love and grace, not judgment or manipulation. His constant presence is meant to provide guidance and comfort, rather than inspire fear.

The spiritual parallel here is worth noting. While surveillance technology often feels invasive and self-serving, it’s also possible to view it as a tool for accountability and safety. For example, the cameras on your doorbell might feel like an invasion of privacy, but they also provide a sense of security. In this way, our modern surveillance landscape mirrors both the benevolent and intrusive aspects of these watchers—helping us, but also keeping us under constant scrutiny.

Living Under the Watchful Eye: Embrace It or Escape It?

Now that we’ve established that surveillance is everywhere—whether through Alexa, Nest cameras, or even the principles baked into cultural icons like Santa—it’s time to ask yourself a critical question: how do you want to live with this reality? Should you embrace the fact that you’re being watched, or is living off the grid truly a better option? Let’s examine both paths.

Option 1: Embrace the Watchfulness

If you choose to embrace the fact that you’re being watched, here’s a potential mindset shift: instead of seeing surveillance as a violation of privacy, view it as an opportunity for accountability. For example:

Use smart devices to your advantage by customizing privacy settings and understanding what data they collect.

Accept that surveillance is a trade-off for convenience. Your Alexa might “listen,” but it can also make your life easier by setting reminders, controlling smart lights, or ordering groceries.

Focus on transparency. Ask yourself, “What am I willing to share in exchange for the benefits I get?” By being mindful of what you post, type, and say near these devices, you can maintain a sense of control.

Option 2: Escape the Grid

Living off the grid is a tempting way to escape the watchful eyes of modern technology. But before you pack your bags and head for the wilderness, consider the trade-offs:

Pros: You’ll enjoy complete privacy, fewer distractions, and a sense of independence. Without constant surveillance, you’re free to live without worrying about digital footprints.

Cons: Living off the grid means giving up the conveniences of modern life, from instant communication to online banking. It also requires significant effort to maintain self-sufficiency.

If you’re leaning toward this path, start small. Try disconnecting from unnecessary tech for a weekend or limiting your use of surveillance-heavy apps. See how it feels before committing fully.

Action Plan: Finding Your Balance

Whether you choose to embrace surveillance or strive for a life of minimal exposure, here are some steps to help you navigate this hyper-connected world:

Audit Your Devices: Take stock of all the devices in your home. Adjust privacy settings, disable unnecessary features, and research what data they collect.

Be Mindful Online: Think before you post, search, or share. The less data you give away, the less you have to worry about being tracked.

Adopt Healthy Boundaries: Use technology intentionally. Set “unplugged” hours during your day to avoid unnecessary exposure to screens and microphones.

Educate Yourself: Stay informed about how surveillance works. The more you know, the more empowered you’ll feel to make choices that align with your values.

Experiment with Minimalism: Try reducing your reliance on smart gadgets. Can you live without Siri for a day? How about a week?

From Santa Claus to the Elf on the Shelf, and now the algorithms embedded in our devices, the notion of being watched has shifted from myth to an undeniable reality. Surveillance is no longer the stuff of folklore—it’s tangible, pervasive, and inescapable.

Consider programs like Israel’s Pegasus, which has the capability to remotely access cameras and microphones without users’ consent. If one nation has developed this technology, it’s safe to assume others have as well. This raises important questions: Should we allow our phones in private spaces like bedrooms and bathrooms? Should we demand devices with removable batteries to ensure they are truly “off” when we want them to be? These steps seem like prudent safeguards in a world where privacy is rapidly eroding.

In the future, we’ll dive deeper into practical tips for spotting surveillance devices in places like hotels or vacation rentals. But for now, the reality is clear—our actions and words may no longer be as private as we’d like to believe. To navigate this new era of constant observation, it’s wise to act with caution, awareness, and perhaps a touch of humor.

After all, the watchers are here to stay—whether we like it or not.

So, what will you do? Will you lean into the conveniences of modern surveillance and make peace with the trade-offs? Or will you take steps to reclaim your privacy and live life on your own terms? The choice is yours, and it’s a decision that will shape how you interact with the world in this digital age.

After all, someone is always watching. The question is: how will you respond?